On Mon, Jan 21, 2008 at 12:35:55PM +, Enrico Zini [EMAIL PROTECTED] was
heard to say:
On Mon, Jan 14, 2008 at 08:11:08PM -0800, Daniel Burrows wrote:
There's also the issue of adding more dependencies to aptitude, which
puts more load on the release team. I also noticed that ept
On Tue, Jan 22, 2008 at 07:05:37AM -0800, Daniel Burrows wrote:
However, with regards to dependencies, you may consider skipping libept
and the debtags index altogether, and just look at Xapian and the index
built by apt-xapian-index into /var/lib/apt-xapian-index/.
While Xapian is on
On Sat, Jan 19, 2008 at 07:36:29AM -0800, Daniel Burrows wrote:
I finally manage to contribute to this thread, of which I care a lot.
So, I suppose I could get into the business of trying to parse the
output of wget ... but that seems fundamentally dicey to me. On the
other hand, I see a
On Mon, Jan 14, 2008 at 08:11:08PM -0800, Daniel Burrows wrote:
There's also the issue of adding more dependencies to aptitude, which
puts more load on the release team. I also noticed that ept
build-depends on Boost, which I have no problem with, but again I don't
know how -release feels
Daniel Burrows wrote:
On Mon, Jan 14, 2008 at 08:11:08PM -0800, Daniel Burrows [EMAIL PROTECTED]
was heard to say:
On Mon, Jan 14, 2008 at 06:16:58PM +0200, Eddy Petrișor [EMAIL PROTECTED]
was heard to say:
[..]
as a different application, which I don't in debtags' case, apt-get
On Mon, Jan 14, 2008 at 08:11:08PM -0800, Daniel Burrows [EMAIL PROTECTED]
was heard to say:
On Mon, Jan 14, 2008 at 06:16:58PM +0200, Eddy Petrișor [EMAIL PROTECTED]
was heard to say:
On 14/01/2008, Daniel Burrows [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
To me (as a user) is really clear what should
On Fri, Feb 02, 2007 at 05:38:07PM -0800, Daniel Burrows wrote:
On Tue, Jan 09, 2007 at 04:35:36PM +0200, Eddy Petrişor [EMAIL PROTECTED]
was heard to say:
Some of the debtags categories shown in aptitude are duplicated (and
suffixed with a curly brace). This was not the case in older
On Mon, Jan 14, 2008 at 10:09:18AM +0100, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
This is not a regression in the aptitude code; instead, it's due to
the fact that the debtags people decided to change the format of their
tags (I'm not sure when, but this is the first time I've noticed it).
Hi. I thought
On Mon, Jan 14, 2008 at 10:09:18AM +0100, Gerfried Fuchs [EMAIL PROTECTED]
was heard to say:
On Fri, Feb 02, 2007 at 05:38:07PM -0800, Daniel Burrows wrote:
On Tue, Jan 09, 2007 at 04:35:36PM +0200, Eddy Petrişor [EMAIL PROTECTED]
was heard to say:
Some of the debtags categories shown in
On 14/01/2008, Daniel Burrows [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Jan 14, 2008 at 10:09:18AM +0100, Gerfried Fuchs [EMAIL PROTECTED]
was heard to say:
On Fri, Feb 02, 2007 at 05:38:07PM -0800, Daniel Burrows wrote:
On Tue, Jan 09, 2007 at 04:35:36PM +0200, Eddy Petrişor [EMAIL
PROTECTED]
On Mon, Jan 14, 2008 at 06:16:58PM +0200, Eddy Petrișor [EMAIL PROTECTED] was
heard to say:
On 14/01/2008, Daniel Burrows [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
All my discussions with Enrico in the past have indicated that the
right thing to do is to use libdebtag/libapt-front/libept, which will
keep
On Tue, Jan 09, 2007 at 04:35:36PM +0200, Eddy Petrişor [EMAIL PROTECTED] was
heard to say:
Package: aptitude
Version: 0.4.4-1
Severity: normal
Hello,
Some of the debtags categories shown in aptitude are duplicated (and
suffixed with a curly brace). This was not the case in older
I noticed the same bug using the commandline interface, tags are not
displayed correctly.
$ aptitude show autoconf
Package: autoconf
[...]
Tag: code-generator, devel::{buildtools, interface::commandline, lang:c},
role::program, scope::utility
$
The problem seems to be caused by
Package: aptitude
Version: 0.4.4-1
Severity: normal
Hello,
Some of the debtags categories shown in aptitude are duplicated (and
suffixed with a curly brace). This was not the case in older releases
(not sure when this changed and I am not sure if is releated/caused by
debtags upgrades and
14 matches
Mail list logo
