On May 15, Thorsten Glaser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Package: module-init-tools
Version: 6.2-3
Why do I keep receiving bugs for a kfreebsd-i386 package which I do not
maintain?
--
ciao,
Marco
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Package: module-init-tools
Version: 6.2-3
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
S20module-init-tools calls '... | sort | uniq' but is run at a time
during bootup where /usr is not yet mounted, and sort and uniq are,
obviously, not available yet:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~ # whence -p
Marco d'Itri dixit:
On May 15, Thorsten Glaser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Package: module-init-tools
Version: 6.2-3
Why do I keep receiving bugs for a kfreebsd-i386 package which I do not
maintain?
No idea, in this case I suspect there are two different packages with
the same name. (I thought
Marco d'Itri wrote:
On May 15, Thorsten Glaser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Package: module-init-tools
Version: 6.2-3
Why do I keep receiving bugs for a kfreebsd-i386 package which I do not
maintain?
Because of this:
X-Original-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from rietz.debian.org
On Tue, 15 May 2007, Marco d'Itri wrote:
On May 15, Thorsten Glaser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Package: module-init-tools
Version: 6.2-3
Why do I keep receiving bugs for a kfreebsd-i386 package which I do not
maintain?
Because people are assigning it to the module-init-tools binary
5 matches
Mail list logo