Quoting Steve Langasek ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Note that the correct group name was "admin", not "adm" which is a separate
> group; there doesn't seem to be an analogous group on Debian systems, so I
> haven't attempted to do any templating here. Debian maintainers, please
> comment if you think w
Quoting Steve Langasek ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> time is simply not acceptable at all to upstream and should not be
> forwarded at this time. (This based on discussion with Jerry @ UDS, in
> which he stated it was upstream's policy to not enable additional features
> by default but that it was fine
On Mon, Nov 12, 2007 at 05:09:21PM +, Christian Perrier wrote:
> Could this patch be splitted between stuff that could go upstream:
> - code changes to make the value of "usershare max shares" defined at
> compile time
> - fixes to the man pages
> and those that are Debian-specific:
> - most
Hi,
Christian Perrier a écrit :
Quoting Jérémie:
Hi,
Mathias Gug a écrit :
On Wed, Sep 19, 2007 at 10:50:01PM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
A first concern comes with the dedicated group name. Should we use
"smbshare" and then still advertise that obsolete acronym (SMB) which
is however kn
Quoting Jérémie Tarot ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Hi,
>
> Mathias Gug a écrit :
> > On Wed, Sep 19, 2007 at 10:50:01PM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
> >> A first concern comes with the dedicated group name. Should we use
> >> "smbshare" and then still advertise that obsolete acronym (SMB) which
> >>
5 matches
Mail list logo
