Bug#448279: [new] wipnity: Why is package X not in testing yet? query script

2007-12-21 Thread Mohammed Adnène Trojette
On Sat, Oct 27, 2007, Julian Mehnle wrote:
 I'd like to suggest the inclusion of a command-line script that queries
 http://bjorn.haxx.se/debian/.  I am attaching one that I wrote and
 use.  It depends on w3m and libterm-size-perl.

Hi, and thanks for your contribution!

What's significantly different from grep-excuses in wipnity?

As I see the script is really short, couldn't it be merged into
grep-excuses as an option?

-- 
Mohammed Adnène Trojette




Bug#448279: [new] wipnity: Why is package X not in testing yet? query script

2007-12-21 Thread Julian Mehnle
Mohammed Adnène Trojette wrote:
 What's significantly different from grep-excuses in wipnity?

I have little idea since I have never used grep-excuses before.  However, 
from looking at it now, it seems that grep-excuses doesn't work for 
source package names, and doesn't give all the information that wipnity 
does, such as build dependency info (and it gives some information that 
wipnity doesn't, such as the maintainer name and bugs fixed).

 As I see the script is really short, couldn't it be merged into
 grep-excuses as an option?

It probably could.  However since I'm not a regular user (or, really no 
user at all) of grep-excuses, I'm probably not the best person to decide 
how it should be merged.

I see that devscripts is team-maintained.  What do the other members of 
your team think?

Julian.


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Bug#448279: [new] wipnity: Why is package X not in testing yet? query script

2007-10-27 Thread Julian Mehnle
Package: devscripts
Severity: wishlist

I'd like to suggest the inclusion of a command-line script that queries
http://bjorn.haxx.se/debian/.  I am attaching one that I wrote and
use.  It depends on w3m and libterm-size-perl.

Here's some example output to give you an idea (although it's kind of
obvious if you know http://bjorn.haxx.se/debian/):

  $ wipnity kmail
  Checking kmail

* binary package kmail is part of source package kdepim
+ trying to update kdepim from 4:3.5.7-4 to 4:3.5.8-1
  (candidate is 10 days old)
+ kdepim is not yet built on arm: 4:3.5.7-4 vs 4:3.5.8-1
  (missing 45 binaries)
+ kdepim is not yet built on powerpc: 4:3.5.7-4 vs 4:3.5.8-1
  (missing 45 binaries)
+ kdepim is waiting for kdelibs
o kdelibs is only 2 days old. It must be 10 days old to go
  in.
o kdelibs is not yet built on arm: 4:3.5.7.dfsg.1-7 vs
  4:3.5.8.dfsg.1-3 (missing 3 binaries: kdelibs-dbg,
  kdelibs4-dev, kdelibs4c2a)
o kdelibs is not yet built on powerpc: 4:3.5.8.dfsg.1-1 vs
  4:3.5.8.dfsg.1-3 (missing 3 binaries: kdelibs-dbg,
  kdelibs4-dev, kdelibs4c2a)

  Dependency analysis (including build-depends; i386 only):

* kdepim depends on kdelibs4-dev = 4:3.5.8 but testing has
  4:3.5.7.dfsg.1-7 (unstable has 4:3.5.8.dfsg.1-3)
+ binary package kdelibs4-dev is part of source package kdelibs
  (explained above)

Julian.


wipnity
Description: Perl program