Hi Nico,
Can you explain how you consider this a copy? all files are different
according to
my reading, though only 5-10% changed. And also what you suggest is
the best way to fix this problem? e.g. is it best for me to grab the source
of ppmd when building (using, say apt-get source) or is the
Hi Guillem,
* Guillem Jover <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-12-29 14:26]:
[...]
> > If it is broken on 64-bit machines then I think I will need to remove
> > it from the build. But that has yet to be demonstrated on this version.
> > I am closing this bug until evidence to that effect comes to me.
>
>
Hi,
On Fri, 2007-12-28 at 20:02:01 -0800, Rudi Cilibrasi wrote:
> On Dec 28, 2007 7:37 PM, Guillem Jover <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Package: libcomplearn-mod-ppmd
> > Version: 1.0.6-1
> > Severity: important
> > Tags: security
> >
> > This package contains an embedded copy of the ppmd source.
Hi,
Thanks for the heads-up. As it turns out, this package is not duplicate source.
It is a derived work made by Maarten Keijzer. The "librification" was done by
him for the purpose of this module. If it is broken on 64-bit machines then
I think I will need to remove it from the build. But tha
Package: libcomplearn-mod-ppmd
Version: 1.0.6-1
Severity: important
Tags: security
Hi,
This package contains an embedded copy of the ppmd source. It should
be using the external program instead for security reasons and to get
the benefits of the portability patches (also most probably the
binarie
5 matches
Mail list logo