Bug#489765: libgtk2.0-0: does not allow lpr printing through Iceweasel 3

2008-07-09 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le lundi 07 juillet 2008 à 21:31 +0200, Jan Willem Stumpel a écrit : Does setting: gtk-print-backends = file,lpr,cups In ~/.gtkrc-2.0 solve things for you? Well, yes, it did! Thanks very much! But having to do this (while it was not necessary before) is a surprise to the users

Bug#489765: libgtk2.0-0: does not allow lpr printing through Iceweasel 3

2008-07-09 Thread Jan Willem Stumpel
Josselin Mouette wrote: Well, users should not be using lprng unless they know what they are doing. You should not be telling what users should do. When you drop a trusted functionality which available for 15 years, you should at least have the politeness to warn users about this fact. --

Bug#489765: libgtk2.0-0: does not allow lpr printing through Iceweasel 3

2008-07-07 Thread Jan Willem Stumpel
Package: libgtk2.0-0 Version: 2.12.10-2 Severity: important Iceweasel 3 cannot print when using lprng; only when using CUPS. Installing libgtk2.0-0 by compiling the sources from gtk.org (there called gtk2+-2.10 or similar) cures the problem. So it seems some Debian customisation of

Bug#489765: libgtk2.0-0: does not allow lpr printing through Iceweasel 3

2008-07-07 Thread Sven Arvidsson
On Mon, 2008-07-07 at 18:31 +0200, Jan Willem Stumpel wrote: Iceweasel 3 cannot print when using lprng; only when using CUPS. Installing libgtk2.0-0 by compiling the sources from gtk.org (there called gtk2+-2.10 or similar) cures the problem. So it seems some Debian customisation of

Bug#489765: libgtk2.0-0: does not allow lpr printing through Iceweasel 3

2008-07-07 Thread Jan Willem Stumpel
Sven Arvidsson wrote: On Mon, 2008-07-07 at 18:31 +0200, Jan Willem Stumpel wrote: Iceweasel 3 cannot print when using lprng; only when using CUPS. Does setting: gtk-print-backends = file,lpr,cups In ~/.gtkrc-2.0 solve things for you? Well, yes, it did! Thanks very much! But having

Bug#489765: libgtk2.0-0: does not allow lpr printing through Iceweasel 3

2008-07-07 Thread Sven Arvidsson
On Mon, 2008-07-07 at 21:31 +0200, Jan Willem Stumpel wrote: But having to do this (while it was not necessary before) is a surprise to the users -- therefore a bug. Some program should do this automatically in its install procedure -- or prompt the user to accept this. But which program?