2008/10/16 Jean-Francois Dockes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks a lot for running these tests and sending the results.
It's quite reassuring that initial indexing works as expected.
About later indexing passes, I had another look at how Recoll *really*
works (as opposed to how I thought it worked
Peter Salisbury writes:
2008/9/30 Jean-Francois Dockes [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
If Peter can spare some time to do more testing, I'd be quite
interested by the output of the following sequence:
- Add loglevel = 4 to ~/.recoll/recoll.conf
- Uninstall the 3 helper packages, then:
time
2008/9/30 Jean-Francois Dockes [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hello,
Kartik Mistry writes:
On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 6:45 PM, Peter Salisbury
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I installed recoll on a fairly sparse system and it took ages to index
every time. It was only when I ran it from a terminal
Package: recoll
Version: 1.10.6-1
I installed recoll on a fairly sparse system and it took ages to index
every time. It was only when I ran it from a terminal that I realised
it was missing some required packages for indexing certain types of
file. Ideally a better message would be given via the
severity 500690 wishlist
thanks
On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 6:45 PM, Peter Salisbury
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Package: recoll
Version: 1.10.6-1
Thanks for reporting bug, Peter.
I installed recoll on a fairly sparse system and it took ages to index
every time. It was only when I ran it from a
Hello,
Kartik Mistry writes:
On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 6:45 PM, Peter Salisbury
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I installed recoll on a fairly sparse system and it took ages to index
every time. It was only when I ran it from a terminal that I realised
it was missing some required packages
6 matches
Mail list logo
