Bug#508418: /etc/init.d/zaptel doesn't wait for udev
tag 508418 +wontfix thanks Zaptel has been replaced with DAHDI in Squeeze. This issue is not likely to be resolved in the stable version. Furthermore, I'm not sure calling udevsettle in the middle of an init.d script is the best option. It may hurt concurrency. Thus I don't move this bug to the package dahdi (at least not for now). -- Tzafrir Cohen icq#16849755 jabber:tzafrir.co...@xorcom.com +972-50-7952406 mailto:tzafrir.co...@xorcom.com http://www.xorcom.com iax:gu...@local.xorcom.com/tzafrir -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#508418: /etc/init.d/zaptel doesn't wait for udev
On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 08:43:12AM +0100, Lars Bensmann wrote: Package: zaptel Version: 1:1.4.11~dfsg-3 Severity: wishlist It would be nice to include a call to 'udevsettle' after modprobing ztdummy. Otherwise ztcfg ist not called. Is udevsettle safe for usage? Or is it expected to be replaced by 'udevadm settle' ? I also found one other minor things: # /etc/init.d/zaptel status /etc/init.d/zaptel: line 136: check_zaptel_timing: command not found Duh. s/check_/test_/ Thanks for reporting. -- Tzafrir Cohen icq#16849755 jabber:[EMAIL PROTECTED] +972-50-7952406 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.xorcom.com iax:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/tzafrir -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#508418: /etc/init.d/zaptel doesn't wait for udev
On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 10:05:01AM +0200, Tzafrir Cohen wrote: Is udevsettle safe for usage? Or is it expected to be replaced by 'udevadm settle' ? Mmmh. I just found some filed bugs for Gentoo and Archlinux, but nothing for Debian. But they state that udevsettle is deprecated. So I guess, 'udevadm settle' is the way to go. -- There are two ways to write error-free programs; only the third one works. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#508418: /etc/init.d/zaptel doesn't wait for udev
On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 09:13:05AM +0100, Lars Bensmann wrote: On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 10:05:01AM +0200, Tzafrir Cohen wrote: Is udevsettle safe for usage? Or is it expected to be replaced by 'udevadm settle' ? Mmmh. I just found some filed bugs for Gentoo and Archlinux, but nothing for Debian. But they state that udevsettle is deprecated. So I guess, 'udevadm settle' is the way to go. We have an ugly fix for it in the script (the loop that waits for /dev/zap/ctl), but it's, well, ugly. udevsettle indeed seems like a much better idea. It will require more testing and thus I'll check it upstream. I have already commited a fix to the other issue you mentioned, which is a minor issue with very minor risk, just in case we get to upload a new version of this package. -- Tzafrir Cohen icq#16849755 jabber:[EMAIL PROTECTED] +972-50-7952406 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.xorcom.com iax:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/tzafrir -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#508418: /etc/init.d/zaptel doesn't wait for udev
On Thu, 11 Dec 2008 10:46:17 +0200, Tzafrir Cohen wrote: We have an ugly fix for it in the script (the loop that waits for /dev/zap/ctl), but it's, well, ugly. udevsettle indeed seems like a much better idea. It will require more testing and thus I'll check it upstream. Are we still talking about /etc/init.d/zaptel? I don't see a loop. And no mention of 'ctl' either (1:1.4.11~dfsg-3). 'udevsettle' vs. 'udevadm settle': The NEWS-entry for udev version 126 mentions: No symlinks to udevadm are installed anymore, if they are still needed, they should be provided by the package. http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/hotplug/udev.git;a=blob;f=NEWS So. 'udevadm settle' should be the future-proof way if you or upstream decide to go that way. I have already commited a fix to the other issue you mentioned, which is a minor issue with very minor risk, just in case we get to upload a new version of this package. Yes. There's definately no hurry there. I just saw it by accident that the function name was misspelled when I included the 'udevsettle' in the script after the upgrade to -3. Didn't even know there was a 'status' function before that :-) -- I came, I saw, I deleted all your files. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#508418: /etc/init.d/zaptel doesn't wait for udev
Package: zaptel Version: 1:1.4.11~dfsg-3 Severity: wishlist It would be nice to include a call to 'udevsettle' after modprobing ztdummy. Otherwise ztcfg ist not called. I also found one other minor things: # /etc/init.d/zaptel status /etc/init.d/zaptel: line 136: check_zaptel_timing: command not found -- System Information: Debian Release: lenny/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (900, 'testing') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.26-1-vserver-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Versions of packages zaptel depends on: ii fxload 0.0.20020411-1.1 Firmware download to EZ-USB device ii libc6 2.7-16 GNU C Library: Shared libraries ii libnewt0.52 0.52.2-11.3 Not Erik's Windowing Toolkit - tex ii libtonezone11:1.4.11~dfsg-3 tonezone library (runtime) ii libusb-0.1-42:0.1.12-13 userspace USB programming library ii procps 1:3.2.7-8/proc file system utilities zaptel recommends no packages. zaptel suggests no packages. -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
