Andreas Tille wrote:
On Thu, 26 Mar 2009, Yavor Doganov wrote:
(only to GNUstep packages, of course)?
Why of course.
As I mentioned when Debian-Med adopted adun.app, I absolutely lack
knowledge/skills for the med part (naturally, I don't purport that
my GNUstep knowledge is superior,
On Wed, 25 Mar 2009, Yavor Doganov wrote:
Here it is. I added some comments in debian/rules for things that
might not be entirely obvious to you -- feel free to strip them.
No, comments are perfectly OK - in contrary, they should be there.
I committed your changes and thank you very much for
Andreas Tille wrote:
On Wed, 25 Mar 2009, Yavor Doganov wrote:
I added some comments in debian/rules for things that might not be
entirely obvious to you -- feel free to strip them.
No, comments are perfectly OK - in contrary, they should be there.
All right. I like comments, but some
On Thu, 26 Mar 2009, Yavor Doganov wrote:
All right. I like comments, but some maintainers consider them
redundant.
I always consider them helpful.
Thanks! I see that you added me to the project -- does that mean that
I can commit without pre-approval
Yep! That was the idea as I said
On Tue, 24 Mar 2009, Scott Christley wrote:
There was some copyright/license issues that needed to be resolved.
Those should all be resolved now,
I'd be very happy if somebody might have a look at biococoa. I have
polished packaging regarding inclusion of documentation and examples,
updating
On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 07:47:57AM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
I'd be very happy if somebody might have a look at biococoa.
Hi Andreas -- there are some serious issues with it.
GNUstep frameworks are packaged like classic shared libraries (that's
what they are, in fact), i.e. the biococoa
On Mar 25, 2009, at 7:43 AM, Yavor Doganov wrote:
On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 07:47:57AM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
I'd be very happy if somebody might have a look at biococoa.
Hi Andreas -- there are some serious issues with it.
GNUstep frameworks are packaged like classic shared libraries
On Wed, 25 Mar 2009, Yavor Doganov wrote:
GNUstep frameworks are packaged like classic shared libraries (that's
what they are, in fact), i.e. the biococoa source package should build
the binary packages libbiococoa2 and libbiococoa-dev.
Fine.
You don't need
the Replaces/Conflicts/Provides:
On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 08:04:36AM -0700, Scott Christley wrote:
This is not exactly correct. sequenceconverter.app is essentially
BioCocoa V1 when the only functionality it had was to read/write
sequence files.
OK, I'm not familiar with these details and did not look at
Le Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 04:12:11PM +0100, Andreas Tille a écrit :
I had the impression that sequenceconverter.app builds and runs
fine without biococoa - strange, but worked on my machine.
Hi all,
I think that biococoa.app only contained sequenceconverter.app by accident
and was actually
On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 04:12:11PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
I had the impression that sequenceconverter.app builds and runs
fine without biococoa - strange, but worked on my machine.
Right, I wrongly assumed that it links against BioCocoa.
I would really appreciate any help here
OK,
On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 05:29:57PM +0200, Yavor Doganov wrote:
On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 04:12:11PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
I would really appreciate any help here
OK, thanks.
Here it is. I added some comments in debian/rules for things that
might not be entirely obvious to you -- feel
On Wed, 25 Mar 2009, Yavor Doganov wrote:
On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 04:12:11PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
I had the impression that sequenceconverter.app builds and runs
fine without biococoa - strange, but worked on my machine.
Right, I wrongly assumed that it links against BioCocoa.
So
On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 09:16:23PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
On Wed, 25 Mar 2009, Yavor Doganov wrote:
Right, I wrongly assumed that it links against BioCocoa.
So most probably we might simply release sequenceconverter.app
completely independant from BioCocoa?
Sure, provided that there is
14 matches
Mail list logo
