On Fri, Aug 06, 2010 at 01:03:31AM +0200, Stefan Bühler wrote:
We still will not make Adding modules to server.modules idempotent,
but i think we fixed the core problem.
The fix is to insert small check to disable loading a module twice, so
you get a clean error message when you try.
2010/8/5 Stefan Bühler stbueh...@lighttpd.net:
Olaf is quite right here: as the order of the modules is important,
adding modules can not be idempotent, and we therefore will not
change it.
What happens when a module is added for the second time?
I don't understand why it can't be idempotent.
On 07/09/2010 12:00 PM, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
On Sat, Jun 26, 2010 at 7:14 PM, Josh Triplettj...@joshtriplett.org wrote:
Rough recipe to reproduce:
A full and minimal lighttpd.conf would be nice.
Although I'm quite sure upstream will say won'tfix. :(
Olaf
Hi!
Olaf is quite right here:
On 08/05/2010 11:26 PM, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
2010/8/5 Stefan Bühlerstbueh...@lighttpd.net:
Olaf is quite right here: as the order of the modules is important,
adding modules can not be idempotent, and we therefore will not
change it.
What happens when a module is added for the second
2010/8/6 Stefan Bühler stbueh...@lighttpd.net:
You think that a module-load-list
(a, a, b) should be the same as (a, b) - i.e. removing duplicates
But there is no good way to decide what to do with (a, b, a),
as (a, b) and (b, a) are really different (order matters);
and therefore we cannot
On 08/06/2010 12:04 AM, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
2010/8/6 Stefan Bühlerstbueh...@lighttpd.net:
You think that a module-load-list
(a, a, b) should be the same as (a, b) - i.e. removing duplicates
But there is no good way to decide what to do with (a, b, a),
as (a, b) and (b, a) are really
Ok,
irc makes it easier to discuss things :)
We still will not make Adding modules to server.modules idempotent,
but i think we fixed the core problem.
The fix is to insert small check to disable loading a module twice, so
you get a clean error message when you try.
See rev 2751:
*
On Sat, Jun 26, 2010 at 7:14 PM, Josh Triplett j...@joshtriplett.org wrote:
Rough recipe to reproduce:
A full and minimal lighttpd.conf would be nice.
Although I'm quite sure upstream will say won'tfix. :(
Olaf
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a
On Fri, Jul 09, 2010 at 12:00:24PM +0200, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
On Sat, Jun 26, 2010 at 7:14 PM, Josh Triplett j...@joshtriplett.org wrote:
Rough recipe to reproduce:
A full and minimal lighttpd.conf would be nice.
Although I'm quite sure upstream will say won'tfix. :(
The recipe I
9 matches
Mail list logo
