Bug#528698: pbuilder: Name dummy package according to source package

2009-05-15 Thread Mehdi Dogguy
Loïc Minier a écrit : On Thu, May 14, 2009, Mehdi Dogguy wrote: I thought it would be nice if pbuilder-satisfydepends-aptitude gives a relevant name to the dummy package. Ok; I guess it's useful for people using these outside of pbuilder. Are you aware of mk-build-deps in devscripts?

Bug#528698: pbuilder: Name dummy package according to source package

2009-05-15 Thread Mehdi Dogguy
Loïc Minier a écrit : dpkg-parsechangelog Yes, but head is part of coreutils which is already a dependency of pbuilder and sed is available anyway… -- Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي http://www.pps.jussieu.fr/~dogguy Tel.: (+33).1.44.27.28.38 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Bug#528698: pbuilder: Name dummy package according to source package

2009-05-15 Thread Loïc Minier
On Fri, May 15, 2009, Mehdi Dogguy wrote: dpkg-parsechangelog Yes, but head is part of coreutils which is already a dependency of pbuilder and sed is available anyway… This is part of dpkg-dev which is always installed to build packages (dep of build-essential); dpkg-parsechangelog is

Bug#528698: pbuilder: Name dummy package according to source package

2009-05-15 Thread Loïc Minier
On Fri, May 15, 2009, Mehdi Dogguy wrote: Perhaps it's better to advertize the use of mk-build-deps and keep our own implementation (which needs to avoid extra deps) minimal? What are the extra dependencies? I use only “sed” which is already used in pbuilder (“head” can be avoided). I'm

Bug#528698: pbuilder: Name dummy package according to source package

2009-05-15 Thread Junichi Uekawa
Hi, At Fri, 15 May 2009 11:17:56 +0200, Loïc Minier wrote: On Fri, May 15, 2009, Mehdi Dogguy wrote: Perhaps it's better to advertize the use of mk-build-deps and keep our own implementation (which needs to avoid extra deps) minimal? What are the extra dependencies? I use only “sed”

Bug#528698: pbuilder: Name dummy package according to source package

2009-05-14 Thread Mehdi Dogguy
Package: pbuilder Version: 0.187 Severity: wishlist Hi, I thought it would be nice if pbuilder-satisfydepends-aptitude gives a relevant name to the dummy package. It could be pbuilder-satisfydepends-dummy-$PACKAGE instead of pbuilder-satisfydepends-dummy. Moreover, giving it a relevant

Bug#528698: pbuilder: Name dummy package according to source package

2009-05-14 Thread Mehdi Dogguy
On 0, Mehdi Dogguy dog...@pps.jussieu.fr wrote: +local PKG_VERSION=$(head -n1 debian/changelog | sed -n's/.\+(\([^ ]\+\)).\+/\1/p') || 0.invalid.0 Oups… I forgot this stupid line. Something like “local PKG_VERSION=$(head -n1 debian/changelog | sed -n's/.\+(\([^ ]\+\)).\+/\1/p') ” should

Bug#528698: pbuilder: Name dummy package according to source package

2009-05-14 Thread Loïc Minier
On Thu, May 14, 2009, Mehdi Dogguy wrote: On 0, Mehdi Dogguy dog...@pps.jussieu.fr wrote: +local PKG_VERSION=$(head -n1 debian/changelog | sed -n's/.\+(\([^ ]\+\)).\+/\1/p') || 0.invalid.0 Oups… I forgot this stupid line. Something like “local PKG_VERSION=$(head -n1 debian/changelog |

Bug#528698: pbuilder: Name dummy package according to source package

2009-05-14 Thread Loïc Minier
On Thu, May 14, 2009, Mehdi Dogguy wrote: I thought it would be nice if pbuilder-satisfydepends-aptitude gives a relevant name to the dummy package. Ok; I guess it's useful for people using these outside of pbuilder. Are you aware of mk-build-deps in devscripts? Perhaps it's better to