On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 11:28:35PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
Has this been seen in Debian proper? Could it be an Ubuntu
specific failure, somehow? How many machines has this been observed on?
It did pass many compilations on my machines, and went through all the
Debian build
On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 11:50:00PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
Now, can I have the full logs, please? How did y'all manage to
get Make going into utils before the src was done?
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libselinux/2.0.82-1
Attached are the amd64 and i386 failure logs
On Tue, Jul 14 2009, Kees Cook wrote:
On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 11:50:00PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
Now, can I have the full logs, please? How did y'all manage to
get Make going into utils before the src was done?
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libselinux/2.0.82-1
Package: libselinux
Version: 2.0.82-1
Severity: normal
User: ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com
Usertags: origin-ubuntu karmic
Hi!
We've seen libselinux FTBFS in Ubuntu when built with 1 core. It's
intermittent, though, so it's been hard to isolate. If we retry for long
enough, it works. Logs
severity 536840 minor
thanks
Hi,
Has this been seen in Debian proper? Could it be an Ubuntu
specific failure, somehow? How many machines has this been observed on?
It did pass many compilations on my machines, and went through all the
Debian build daemons, and a number of them do
tags 536840 +unreproducible,moreinfo
thanks
Hi,
I don't see how this is a upstream Makefile issue.
This is in the top level make: we first run in src, then in
utils, no matter what j is. And, if you use
--8---cut here---start-8---
all:
6 matches
Mail list logo
