Bug#545883: 686 version of memcached
El jueves, 24 de septiembre de 2009, azhr...@underhanded.org escribió: Initially, there was only an amd64 deb listed in the bug reply, and in the archives as well. The x86 version seemed to go up a few days later, and all is well. Thanks! ;) I'm so sorry for my answer. I understood that you wanted an optimized version for *i686*, additionally to the i386 one. As I have an amd64 computer, I upload versions only for that architecture, and the i386 version (and the rest) are done by the autobuilders, servers devoted to build missing pacjages for the rest of architectures. If you want more information, take a look to http://www.debian.org/devel/buildd/ . Sorry for the misunderstanding, and enjoy! Ender. -- Network engineer - System administrator Debian Developer signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Bug#545883: 686 version of memcached
El viernes, 18 de septiembre de 2009, azhr...@underhanded.org escribió: Thanks for the quick updates, is there an i686 version on the way as well? I beg you pardon? Why there should be such version of memcached? I haven't seen such improvement just by compiling with 686 flags, and anyway I'm more than sure than almost none is using memcached seriously with x86 kernels, but amd64 ones. Best regards, Ender. -- Network engineer - System administrator Debian Developer signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Bug#545883: 686 version of memcached
Initially, there was only an amd64 deb listed in the bug reply, and in the archives as well. The x86 version seemed to go up a few days later, and all is well. Thanks! ;) On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 05:22:40PM +0200, David Martínez Moreno wrote: El viernes, 18 de septiembre de 2009, azhr...@underhanded.org escribió: Thanks for the quick updates, is there an i686 version on the way as well? I beg you pardon? Why there should be such version of memcached? I haven't seen such improvement just by compiling with 686 flags, and anyway I'm more than sure than almost none is using memcached seriously with x86 kernels, but amd64 ones. -- ICQ: 116080581 | Jabber: azhr...@underhanded.org AIM/Y!: AzhrarnLOD | IRC: Azhrarn @ irc.chatspike.net ( Vim, Tabs, BSD Braces, Debian, and Perl ) signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#545883: 686 version of memcached
Thanks for the quick updates, is there an i686 version on the way as well? signature.asc Description: Digital signature
