Bug#551931: libprotobuf-dev: Version 2.2 released on August 11
On 13 November 2009 at 12:32, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: | Added CC to debian-release... | | On 13 November 2009 at 19:11, Iustin Pop wrote: | | On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 05:24:59AM -0600, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: | | | | On 31 October 2009 at 04:49, Iustin Pop wrote: | | | On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 07:08:43PM -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: | | | | | | On 22 October 2009 at 10:09, Iustin Pop wrote: | | | | On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 03:53:11PM -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: | | | | | | | | Package: libprotobuf-dev | | | | Version: 2.1.0-1 | | | | Severity: normal | | | | | | | | http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/ has version 2.2.0 released on August 11. | | | | It would be nice if you could roll the package forward to this version. | | | | | | | | Thanks, I knew about the release but have travelled a lot recently, didn't have | | | | time to work on it. Will do so in a couple of weeks. | | | | | | Do you want help? I copied the debian/ directory from your 2.1.0-1 into a | | | 2.2.0 source tree and it builds fine. Adding | | | | | |usr/lib/pkgconfig/* | | | | | | to debian/libprotobuf-dev.install even adds the two new pkg-config files. | | | | | | Looks to be lintian-clean and fine from casual inspection. I can prepare an | | | NMU if you want. | | | | | | Hmm, I don't think an NMU is a good idea since new versions of protobuf | | | require a transition - last time I was bashed by release team for not | | | doing things properly :) | | | | | | Anyway, I'll try to prepare the package this weeked (finally reached | | | home!) and see how to sync-up with the transition; offer for help noted | | | ;-) | | | | I would like to a NMU with a proper delayed upload in the next few days. | | Is that ok with you? I plan on raising the library name libprotobuf5. | | | | Yes please. Unfortunately I've been very busy lately, and will not be able to | | work on it for around two more weeks. | | | | But I'd recommend again talking with debian-release to make sure the library | | bump is coordinated. | | Besides bumping the library soname to libprotobuf5 (we already libprotobuf2, | 3, and ...4) and adding the line to debian/libprotobuf-dev.install so | that the new pkg-config files get added, is there anything that | debian-release wants me to do? Did you in the past alter the src/Makefile.am ? It has so-major 4 encoded: libprotobuf_la_LDFLAGS = -version-info 4:0:0 but if I try to replace your 2.1 builds with the 2.2 builds I just made I it is NOT a transparent replacement. So we need a new major number that differs from upstream. Is that what you did before? Dirk | According to a quick 'rdepends' only one other package is currently using | this: | | ~ apt-cache rdepends libprotobuf4 | libprotobuf4 | Reverse Depends: | protobuf-c-compiler | mumble | mumble-server | protobuf-compiler | libprotoc4 | libprotobuf-dev | protobuf-c-compiler | ~ | | So we should be fine, right? | | Dirk | | -- | Three out of two people have difficulties with fractions. | -- Three out of two people have difficulties with fractions. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#551931: libprotobuf-dev: Version 2.2 released on August 11
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 05:24:59AM -0600, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: On 31 October 2009 at 04:49, Iustin Pop wrote: | On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 07:08:43PM -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: | | On 22 October 2009 at 10:09, Iustin Pop wrote: | | On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 03:53:11PM -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: | | | | Package: libprotobuf-dev | | Version: 2.1.0-1 | | Severity: normal | | | | http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/ has version 2.2.0 released on August 11. | | It would be nice if you could roll the package forward to this version. | | | | Thanks, I knew about the release but have travelled a lot recently, didn't have | | time to work on it. Will do so in a couple of weeks. | | Do you want help? I copied the debian/ directory from your 2.1.0-1 into a | 2.2.0 source tree and it builds fine. Adding | |usr/lib/pkgconfig/* | | to debian/libprotobuf-dev.install even adds the two new pkg-config files. | | Looks to be lintian-clean and fine from casual inspection. I can prepare an | NMU if you want. | | Hmm, I don't think an NMU is a good idea since new versions of protobuf | require a transition - last time I was bashed by release team for not | doing things properly :) | | Anyway, I'll try to prepare the package this weeked (finally reached | home!) and see how to sync-up with the transition; offer for help noted | ;-) I would like to a NMU with a proper delayed upload in the next few days. Is that ok with you? I plan on raising the library name libprotobuf5. Yes please. Unfortunately I've been very busy lately, and will not be able to work on it for around two more weeks. But I'd recommend again talking with debian-release to make sure the library bump is coordinated. iustin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#551931: libprotobuf-dev: Version 2.2 released on August 11
Added CC to debian-release... On 13 November 2009 at 19:11, Iustin Pop wrote: | On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 05:24:59AM -0600, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: | | On 31 October 2009 at 04:49, Iustin Pop wrote: | | On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 07:08:43PM -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: | | | | On 22 October 2009 at 10:09, Iustin Pop wrote: | | | On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 03:53:11PM -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: | | | | | | Package: libprotobuf-dev | | | Version: 2.1.0-1 | | | Severity: normal | | | | | | http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/ has version 2.2.0 released on August 11. | | | It would be nice if you could roll the package forward to this version. | | | | | | Thanks, I knew about the release but have travelled a lot recently, didn't have | | | time to work on it. Will do so in a couple of weeks. | | | | Do you want help? I copied the debian/ directory from your 2.1.0-1 into a | | 2.2.0 source tree and it builds fine. Adding | | | |usr/lib/pkgconfig/* | | | | to debian/libprotobuf-dev.install even adds the two new pkg-config files. | | | | Looks to be lintian-clean and fine from casual inspection. I can prepare an | | NMU if you want. | | | | Hmm, I don't think an NMU is a good idea since new versions of protobuf | | require a transition - last time I was bashed by release team for not | | doing things properly :) | | | | Anyway, I'll try to prepare the package this weeked (finally reached | | home!) and see how to sync-up with the transition; offer for help noted | | ;-) | | I would like to a NMU with a proper delayed upload in the next few days. | Is that ok with you? I plan on raising the library name libprotobuf5. | | Yes please. Unfortunately I've been very busy lately, and will not be able to | work on it for around two more weeks. | | But I'd recommend again talking with debian-release to make sure the library | bump is coordinated. Besides bumping the library soname to libprotobuf5 (we already libprotobuf2, 3, and ...4) and adding the line to debian/libprotobuf-dev.install so that the new pkg-config files get added, is there anything that debian-release wants me to do? According to a quick 'rdepends' only one other package is currently using this: ~ apt-cache rdepends libprotobuf4 libprotobuf4 Reverse Depends: protobuf-c-compiler mumble mumble-server protobuf-compiler libprotoc4 libprotobuf-dev protobuf-c-compiler ~ So we should be fine, right? Dirk -- Three out of two people have difficulties with fractions. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#551931: libprotobuf-dev: Version 2.2 released on August 11
On 31 October 2009 at 04:49, Iustin Pop wrote: | On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 07:08:43PM -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: | | On 22 October 2009 at 10:09, Iustin Pop wrote: | | On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 03:53:11PM -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: | | | | Package: libprotobuf-dev | | Version: 2.1.0-1 | | Severity: normal | | | | http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/ has version 2.2.0 released on August 11. | | It would be nice if you could roll the package forward to this version. | | | | Thanks, I knew about the release but have travelled a lot recently, didn't have | | time to work on it. Will do so in a couple of weeks. | | Do you want help? I copied the debian/ directory from your 2.1.0-1 into a | 2.2.0 source tree and it builds fine. Adding | |usr/lib/pkgconfig/* | | to debian/libprotobuf-dev.install even adds the two new pkg-config files. | | Looks to be lintian-clean and fine from casual inspection. I can prepare an | NMU if you want. | | Hmm, I don't think an NMU is a good idea since new versions of protobuf | require a transition - last time I was bashed by release team for not | doing things properly :) | | Anyway, I'll try to prepare the package this weeked (finally reached | home!) and see how to sync-up with the transition; offer for help noted | ;-) I would like to a NMU with a proper delayed upload in the next few days. Is that ok with you? I plan on raising the library name libprotobuf5. Dirk -- Three out of two people have difficulties with fractions. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#551931: libprotobuf-dev: Version 2.2 released on August 11
On 22 October 2009 at 10:09, Iustin Pop wrote: | On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 03:53:11PM -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: | | Package: libprotobuf-dev | Version: 2.1.0-1 | Severity: normal | | http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/ has version 2.2.0 released on August 11. | It would be nice if you could roll the package forward to this version. | | Thanks, I knew about the release but have travelled a lot recently, didn't have | time to work on it. Will do so in a couple of weeks. Do you want help? I copied the debian/ directory from your 2.1.0-1 into a 2.2.0 source tree and it builds fine. Adding usr/lib/pkgconfig/* to debian/libprotobuf-dev.install even adds the two new pkg-config files. Looks to be lintian-clean and fine from casual inspection. I can prepare an NMU if you want. Dirk -- Three out of two people have difficulties with fractions. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#551931: libprotobuf-dev: Version 2.2 released on August 11
On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 07:08:43PM -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: On 22 October 2009 at 10:09, Iustin Pop wrote: | On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 03:53:11PM -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: | | Package: libprotobuf-dev | Version: 2.1.0-1 | Severity: normal | | http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/ has version 2.2.0 released on August 11. | It would be nice if you could roll the package forward to this version. | | Thanks, I knew about the release but have travelled a lot recently, didn't have | time to work on it. Will do so in a couple of weeks. Do you want help? I copied the debian/ directory from your 2.1.0-1 into a 2.2.0 source tree and it builds fine. Adding usr/lib/pkgconfig/* to debian/libprotobuf-dev.install even adds the two new pkg-config files. Looks to be lintian-clean and fine from casual inspection. I can prepare an NMU if you want. Hmm, I don't think an NMU is a good idea since new versions of protobuf require a transition - last time I was bashed by release team for not doing things properly :) Anyway, I'll try to prepare the package this weeked (finally reached home!) and see how to sync-up with the transition; offer for help noted ;-) thanks! iustin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#551931: libprotobuf-dev: Version 2.2 released on August 11
On 31 October 2009 at 04:49, Iustin Pop wrote: | On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 07:08:43PM -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: | Looks to be lintian-clean and fine from casual inspection. I can prepare an | NMU if you want. | | Hmm, I don't think an NMU is a good idea since new versions of protobuf | require a transition - last time I was bashed by release team for not | doing things properly :) Yes, I have a more 'aww shucks' attitude when it comes to versioning of shared libraries. But I probably also do not maintain something that changes as much. That said, were there really ABI/API changes that require libprotobuf[234] and now ...5 ? | Anyway, I'll try to prepare the package this weeked (finally reached | home!) and see how to sync-up with the transition; offer for help noted | ;-) Super -- it's appreciated :) Dirk -- Three out of two people have difficulties with fractions. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#551931: libprotobuf-dev: Version 2.2 released on August 11
On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 03:53:11PM -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: Package: libprotobuf-dev Version: 2.1.0-1 Severity: normal http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/ has version 2.2.0 released on August 11. It would be nice if you could roll the package forward to this version. Thanks, I knew about the release but have travelled a lot recently, didn't have time to work on it. Will do so in a couple of weeks. iustin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#551931: libprotobuf-dev: Version 2.2 released on August 11
Package: libprotobuf-dev Version: 2.1.0-1 Severity: normal http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/ has version 2.2.0 released on August 11. It would be nice if you could roll the package forward to this version. Thanks for maintaining protobuf. Dirk -- System Information: Debian Release: squeeze/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.26-1-686 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Versions of packages libprotobuf-dev depends on: ii libprotobuf4 2.1.0-1protocol buffers C++ library libprotobuf-dev recommends no packages. libprotobuf-dev suggests no packages. -- no debconf information -- Three out of two people have difficulties with fractions. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
