X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Joey Hess wrote:
There is some potential for speeding up dh. Josh Tripplet and I once
discussed:
* Having dh optimize out calls to debhelper commands that will be
no-ops. For a subset of
On 2012-07-12 12:41, Niels Thykier wrote:
Joey Hess wrote:
There is some potential for speeding up dh. Josh Tripplet and I once
discussed:
* Having dh optimize out calls to debhelper commands that will be
no-ops. For a subset of commands, this can be determined just
by looking for
Modestas Vainius modes...@vainius.eu writes:
* Detect noop (empty) override targets when parsing debian/rules and avoid
make calls for them. Patch attached.
Any progress with this patch?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe.
retitle 560423 debhelper: Add debian/dh.norun file to list commands not to run
(ver 8?)
thanks
debian/dh_norun
As the files under debian/* use the dot(.) notation, like in:
debian/package.install
Perhaps it is better to use similar convention for dh specific
instructions:
Hello,
On penktadienis 11 Gruodis 2009 03:41:44 Jari Aalto wrote:
The debhelper 7 is good and in some ways excessive. To build a simple
package, it churns over all possible commands (see below).
SUGGESTION
Please add support for file
debian/dh_norun
The file would list those
Modestas Vainius modes...@vainius.eu writes:
SUGGESTION
Please add support for file
c debian/dh_norun
The file would list those commands that do not need to be run for the
current package. Commands would be listed one at a line. Comments
would be allowed with #.
IMHO, this would be
Modestas Vainius wrote:
If debhelper program has nothing to do, it will exit fast. Slow down should
be
minimal.
There is some potential for speeding up dh. Josh Tripplet and I once
discussed:
* Having dh optimize out calls to debhelper commands that will be
no-ops. For a subset of
Hello,
On penktadienis 11 Gruodis 2009 20:58:44 Joey Hess wrote:
Modestas Vainius wrote:
If debhelper program has nothing to do, it will exit fast. Slow down
should be minimal.
There is some potential for speeding up dh. Josh Tripplet and I once
discussed:
* Having dh optimize out
Hello,
On penktadienis 11 Gruodis 2009 13:23:27 Jari Aalto wrote:
That's good for finer tuning, but a simple debian/dh_norun file would
just announce these commands are not used by this package; they have no
relevance
I don't understand why you want another file for this. Sequence setup
Modestas Vainius modes...@vainius.eu writes:
I don't understand why you want another file for this. Sequence setup
naturally *belongs* to debian/rules, it should be visible from there.
If dh(1) is in use, there are not many sequences in debian/rules. The
point of moving to single dh(1) is to
Package: debhelper
Version: 7.4.3
Severity: wishlist
The debhelper 7 is good and in some ways excessive. To build a simple
package, it churns over all possible commands (see below).
SUGGESTION
Please add support for file
debian/dh_norun
The file would list those commands that do not
11 matches
Mail list logo