Bug#567876: DKIM-related failures should not end up in the panic log

2010-08-28 Thread Andreas Metzler
tags 567876 pending thanks On 2010-08-18 Andreas Metzler ametz...@downhill.at.eu.org wrote: On 2010-08-17 Philipp Kern pk...@debian.org wrote: On Mon, Feb 01, 2010 at 07:11:58PM +0100, Andreas Metzler wrote: Looks like restricting the error to main_log is the right thing to do. could we

Bug#567876: DKIM-related failures should not end up in the panic log

2010-08-18 Thread Andreas Metzler
On 2010-08-17 Philipp Kern pk...@debian.org wrote: Andreas, On Mon, Feb 01, 2010 at 07:11:58PM +0100, Andreas Metzler wrote: Looks like restricting the error to main_log is the right thing to do. could we get that done? At least in Debian? Considering how pedantic Exim is when it comes

Bug#567876: DKIM-related failures should not end up in the panic log

2010-08-17 Thread Philipp Kern
Andreas, On Mon, Feb 01, 2010 at 07:11:58PM +0100, Andreas Metzler wrote: Looks like restricting the error to main_log is the right thing to do. could we get that done? At least in Debian? Considering how pedantic Exim is when it comes to a panic_log having content, it is really annoying to

Bug#567876: DKIM-related failures should not end up in the panic log

2010-04-18 Thread Bernhard Kuemel
Is there anything else to do than to delete (this line from) the panic.log? Was the signature verification only disabled for this one message or do we have to enable it somehow again? Bernhard -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe.

Bug#567876: DKIM-related failures should not end up in the panic log

2010-04-18 Thread Andreas Metzler
On 2010-04-18 Bernhard Kuemel bernh...@bksys.at wrote: Is there anything else to do than to delete (this line from) the panic.log? No. Was the signature verification only disabled for this one message or do we have to enable it somehow again? There is no need to re-enable verification it

Bug#567876: DKIM-related failures should not end up in the panic log

2010-02-01 Thread Andreas Metzler
forwarded 567876 http://mid.gmane.org/200912031200.14973.ke%40helinet.de thanks On 2010-01-31 Florian Weimer f...@deneb.enyo.de wrote: Package: exim4-daemon-heavy Version: 4.71-3 I don't think these messages belong to the panic log: 2010-01-31 21:41:16 1Nbga6-0005ZL-FH DKIM: Error while

Bug#567876: DKIM-related failures should not end up in the panic log

2010-02-01 Thread Florian Weimer
* Andreas Metzler: This was also discussed upstream, ending with: -- On 2009-12-18 Kerstin Espey wrote Am Donnerstag, 17. Dezember 2009 schrieb Tom Kistner: [...] Looking through the code, these are the most likely causes for the

Bug#567876: DKIM-related failures should not end up in the panic log

2010-02-01 Thread Andreas Metzler
On 2010-02-01 Florian Weimer f...@deneb.enyo.de wrote: * Andreas Metzler: This was also discussed upstream, ending with: -- On 2009-12-18 Kerstin Espey wrote Am Donnerstag, 17. Dezember 2009 schrieb Tom Kistner: [...] Looking through

Bug#567876: DKIM-related failures should not end up in the panic log

2010-01-31 Thread Florian Weimer
Package: exim4-daemon-heavy Version: 4.71-3 I don't think these messages belong to the panic log: 2010-01-31 21:41:16 1Nbga6-0005ZL-FH DKIM: Error while running this message through validation, disabling signature verification. The error message could be more helpful, too. The message in