For those who wonder what is the status of this bug: it's currently
blocked with this upstream issue:
http://code.google.com/p/pyopenfst/issues/detail?id=6
--
Jakub Wilk
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Jakub Wilk wrote:
> * Frank Lin PIAT , 2010-04-28, 08:33:
>>> * Package name: pyopenfst
>>python-openfst ?
>
> I don't see any reason to deviate from the upstream name. (Python Policy
> 2.2 does not apply here, as it doesn't talk about source package names.)
I suppose that the source will be n
* Frank Lin PIAT , 2010-04-28, 08:33:
* Package name: pyopenfst
python-openfst ?
I don't see any reason to deviate from the upstream name. (Python Policy
2.2 does not apply here, as it doesn't talk about source package names.)
I would suggest duplicating libopenfst's description, then
Hello,
On Tue, 2010-04-27 at 17:04 +0200, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
> Owner: Jakub Wilk
>
> * Package name: pyopenfst
python-openfst ?
>Version : (not released yet)
>Upstream Author : Thomas Breuel, David Huggins-Daines
> * URL : http
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Jakub Wilk
* Package name: pyopenfst
Version : (not released yet)
Upstream Author : Thomas Breuel, David Huggins-Daines
* URL : http://code.google.com/p/pyopenfst/
* License : Apache License 2.0
Programming Lang: C++
5 matches
Mail list logo
