Bug#590166: [Pkg-xfce-devel] Bug#590166: thunar-data: missing sendto action for blueman-sendto
On dim., 2010-07-25 at 11:34 +0100, Darren Salt wrote: I demand that Yves-Alexis Perez may or may not have written... On sam., 2010-07-24 at 12:27 +0100, Darren Salt wrote: thunar-data has a sento action for bluetooth-sendto, which isn't provided by blueman. However, there is an equivalent which is provided: blueman-sendto. Essentially, this needs no more than a copy of bluetooth-sendto.desktop with s/bluetooth/blueman/g (or a symlink from bluetooth-sendto to blueman-sendto, which would be best done in blueman but would require the addition of Conflicts headers). What do you mean? That the sendto file should be added in Thunar or in blueman? Whichever's more practical. I mention it here because of bluetooth-sendto.desktop. I'm not strongly opposed to add one (though that should be done upstream, ideally), but at one point it's hard to say if thunar should ship sendto files for each and every application, or if each and every application should ship sendto files for each and every file manager (the best would be a common spec for sendto files, imho) The apps should, because there are more of them; but, either way, it becomes a little silly if both blueman-sendo and bluetooth-sendto are available (which, I suppose, could happen if you have different users who prefer different desktop environments). It doesn't seem avoidable without extending the specification or telling them to hide entries. Could you craft such a blueman-sendto.desktop? Regards, -- Yves-Alexis -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#590166: [Pkg-xfce-devel] Bug#590166: thunar-data: missing sendto action for blueman-sendto
On sam., 2010-07-24 at 12:27 +0100, Darren Salt wrote: Package: thunar-data Version: 1.0.2-1 thunar-data has a sento action for bluetooth-sendto, which isn't provided by blueman. However, there is an equivalent which is provided: blueman-sendto. Essentially, this needs no more than a copy of bluetooth-sendto.desktop with s/bluetooth/blueman/g (or a symlink from bluetooth-sendto to blueman-sendto, which would be best done in blueman but would require the addition of Conflicts headers). What do you mean? That the sendto file should be added in Thunar or in blueman? I'm not strongly opposed to add one (though that should be done upstream, ideally), but at one point it's hard to say if thunar should ship sendto files for each and every application, or if each and every application should ship sendto files for each and every file manager (the best would be a common spec for sendto files, imho) Cheers, -- Yves-Alexis signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#590166: thunar-data: missing sendto action for blueman-sendto
I demand that Yves-Alexis Perez may or may not have written... On sam., 2010-07-24 at 12:27 +0100, Darren Salt wrote: thunar-data has a sento action for bluetooth-sendto, which isn't provided by blueman. However, there is an equivalent which is provided: blueman-sendto. Essentially, this needs no more than a copy of bluetooth-sendto.desktop with s/bluetooth/blueman/g (or a symlink from bluetooth-sendto to blueman-sendto, which would be best done in blueman but would require the addition of Conflicts headers). What do you mean? That the sendto file should be added in Thunar or in blueman? Whichever's more practical. I mention it here because of bluetooth-sendto.desktop. I'm not strongly opposed to add one (though that should be done upstream, ideally), but at one point it's hard to say if thunar should ship sendto files for each and every application, or if each and every application should ship sendto files for each and every file manager (the best would be a common spec for sendto files, imho) The apps should, because there are more of them; but, either way, it becomes a little silly if both blueman-sendo and bluetooth-sendto are available (which, I suppose, could happen if you have different users who prefer different desktop environments). It doesn't seem avoidable without extending the specification or telling them to hide entries. -- | Darren Salt| linux at youmustbejoking | nr. Ashington, | Toon | using Debian GNU/Linux | or ds,demon,co,uk| Northumberland | back! | Let's keep the pound sterling After purchasing an item, you will find it on sale next week. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#590166: thunar-data: missing sendto action for blueman-sendto
Package: thunar-data Version: 1.0.2-1 thunar-data has a sento action for bluetooth-sendto, which isn't provided by blueman. However, there is an equivalent which is provided: blueman-sendto. Essentially, this needs no more than a copy of bluetooth-sendto.desktop with s/bluetooth/blueman/g (or a symlink from bluetooth-sendto to blueman-sendto, which would be best done in blueman but would require the addition of Conflicts headers). -- | Darren Salt| linux at youmustbejoking | nr. Ashington, | Toon | using Debian GNU/Linux | or ds,demon,co,uk| Northumberland | back! | + Generate power using sun, wind, water, nuclear. FORGET COAL AND OIL. At any event, the people whose seats are furthest from the aisle arrive last. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
