Bug#635382: [tex-live] new release of latex-unicode

2012-04-20 Thread Wolfgang Jeltsch
Am Freitag, den 20.04.2012, 00:09 +0200 schrieb Reinhard Kotucha: On 2012-04-19 at 23:17:50 +0300, Wolfgang Jeltsch wrote: At least, the following minimal example works as expected: \documentclass{article} \usepackage[utf8x]{inputenc} \usepackage[vietnam]{babel}

Bug#635382: [tex-live] new release of latex-unicode

2012-04-20 Thread Wolfgang Jeltsch
Am Mittwoch, den 18.04.2012, 17:47 +0300 schrieb Wolfgang Jeltsch: Furthermore, I have a problem with building the documentation. I’ve added a changelog, but it isn’t included in the PDF that LaTeX produces. I’ve tried with an additional \RecordChanges, but with no success. I’ve re-added

Bug#635382: [tex-live] new release of latex-unicode

2012-04-20 Thread Norbert Preining
Hi Wolfgang, On Fr, 20 Apr 2012, Wolfgang Jeltsch wrote: I’ve re-added \RecordChanges now, since it is obviously needed, and changed a few other details. However, the changelog is still not show. I never used docstrip etc before, but google helped, and an example document, too ;-)

Bug#635382: [tex-live] new release of latex-unicode

2012-04-19 Thread Wolfgang Jeltsch
Am Mittwoch, den 18.04.2012, 23:51 +0200 schrieb Reinhard Kotucha: If someone uses control sequences like \ohorn in macro packages already, does he have to change them to \horn o when using ucs? No. The ucs package doesn’t change the way \horn, \ohorn, etc. work. It just ensures that whenever

Bug#635382: [tex-live] new release of latex-unicode

2012-04-19 Thread Reinhard Kotucha
On 2012-04-19 at 23:17:50 +0300, Wolfgang Jeltsch wrote: Am Mittwoch, den 18.04.2012, 23:51 +0200 schrieb Reinhard Kotucha: If someone uses control sequences like \ohorn in macro packages already, does he have to change them to \horn o when using ucs? No. The ucs package doesn’t

Bug#635382: [tex-live] new release of latex-unicode

2012-04-18 Thread Wolfgang Jeltsch
Am Mittwoch, den 11.04.2012, 23:06 +0200 schrieb Reinhard Kotucha: On 2012-04-11 at 15:47:06 +0900, Norbert Preining wrote: Dear Wolfgang, I was taking a look at your darcs repository and compared it with what is currently available on the CTAN. Besides the addition of .dtx/.ins files

Bug#635382: [tex-live] new release of latex-unicode

2012-04-18 Thread Wolfgang Jeltsch
Am Freitag, den 13.04.2012, 07:31 +0900 schrieb Norbert Preining: Hi Wolfgang, thanks for your answer. On Do, 12 Apr 2012, Wolfgang Jeltsch wrote: Norbert’s e-mail made me start with the polishing of the Unicode package I had planned to do some time ago. So please don’t upload yet. I

Bug#635382: [tex-live] new release of latex-unicode

2012-04-18 Thread Wolfgang Jeltsch
Am Mittwoch, den 18.04.2012, 17:47 +0300 schrieb Wolfgang Jeltsch: Am Freitag, den 13.04.2012, 07:31 +0900 schrieb Norbert Preining: Hi Wolfgang, thanks for your answer. On Do, 12 Apr 2012, Wolfgang Jeltsch wrote: Norbert’s e-mail made me start with the polishing of the Unicode

Bug#635382: [tex-live] new release of latex-unicode

2012-04-18 Thread Werner LEMBERG
I wonder whether it is sensible to always call the package “ucs”, in particular, to rename the directory on CTAN from “unicode” to “ucs”. Is this possible and feasible? What do you think? +1 Werner -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject

Bug#635382: [tex-live] new release of latex-unicode

2012-04-18 Thread Werner LEMBERG
I have no idea what this change was for. And while I have found references to \OHORN, \ohorn, \UHORN, and \uhorn in The Comprehensive LateX Symbol List, I haven’t found references to \horn. So maybe, it is best if I just revert this change. `\horn' is a virtual accent used in t5enc.def (in

Bug#635382: [tex-live] new release of latex-unicode

2012-04-18 Thread Wolfgang Jeltsch
Am Mittwoch, den 18.04.2012, 18:07 +0200 schrieb Werner LEMBERG: I have no idea what this change was for. And while I have found references to \OHORN, \ohorn, \UHORN, and \uhorn in The Comprehensive LateX Symbol List, I haven’t found references to \horn. So maybe, it is best if I just

Bug#635382: [tex-live] new release of latex-unicode

2012-04-18 Thread Werner LEMBERG
So is it okay for ucs to map the Unicode horn characters to \horn O, \horn o, \horn U, and \horn u, as it is done currently? I think so, yes. No time to actually check it. Werner -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe.

Bug#635382: [tex-live] new release of latex-unicode

2012-04-18 Thread Reinhard Kotucha
On 2012-04-18 at 17:35:55 +0300, Wolfgang Jeltsch wrote: Am Mittwoch, den 11.04.2012, 23:06 +0200 schrieb Reinhard Kotucha: On 2012-04-11 at 15:47:06 +0900, Norbert Preining wrote: Dear Wolfgang, I was taking a look at your darcs repository and compared it with what is

Bug#635382: [tex-live] new release of latex-unicode

2012-04-12 Thread Wolfgang Jeltsch
Am Mittwoch, den 11.04.2012, 23:06 +0200 schrieb Reinhard Kotucha: On 2012-04-11 at 15:47:06 +0900, Norbert Preining wrote: Dear Wolfgang, I was taking a look at your darcs repository and compared it with what is currently available on the CTAN. Besides the addition of .dtx/.ins

Bug#635382: [tex-live] new release of latex-unicode

2012-04-12 Thread Norbert Preining
Hi Wolfgang, thanks for your answer. On Do, 12 Apr 2012, Wolfgang Jeltsch wrote: Norbert’s e-mail made me start with the polishing of the Unicode package I had planned to do some time ago. So please don’t upload yet. I plan to Ok, no problem. have a version ready for release within the

Bug#635382: [tex-live] new release of latex-unicode

2012-04-11 Thread Reinhard Kotucha
On 2012-04-11 at 15:47:06 +0900, Norbert Preining wrote: Dear Wolfgang, I was taking a look at your darcs repository and compared it with what is currently available on the CTAN. Besides the addition of .dtx/.ins files and some more scripts and text files, there are some changes: