Bug#653630: /sbin/mount.nfs: Re: nfs-common: Only root can unmount, nautilus badly confused

2012-01-27 Thread Roger Leigh
On Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at 10:42:58PM +0100, Luk Claes wrote:
 On 01/22/2012 09:32 PM, Pavel Yakunin wrote:
  
  
 
  Pavel: Can you have a look if the new version from unstable fixes your
  problem (this bug)?
 
  Luk, did you push the new version in the sid repo? (or maybe I should
  wait for a while? I used us.debian.org mirror). Apt tell me that nothing
 
 Yes, version 1:1.2.5-4. It was probably not pushed to the mirrors yet.
 
 Can you test if it fixes the bug, thanks already?

I'm not sure that it is, at least for me:

% cat /etc/exports | grep '^[^#]'
/home localhost(rw,sync,fsid=0,no_subtree_check)
% grep nfs /etc/fstab
localhost:/ /mnt nfs4 user,noauto 0 0
% mount /mnt
% mount | grep nfs
rpc_pipefs on /var/lib/nfs/rpc_pipefs type rpc_pipefs (rw,relatime)
nfsd on /proc/fs/nfsd type nfsd (rw,relatime)
localhost:/ on /mnt type nfs4 
(rw,nosuid,nodev,noexec,relatime,vers=4,rsize=1048576,wsize=1048576,namlen=255,hard,proto=tcp6,timeo=600,retrans=2,sec=sys,clientaddr=::1,minorversion=0,local_lock=none,addr=::1,user=rleigh)
% cat /run/mount/utab
SRC=localhost:/ TARGET=/mnt ROOT=/ ATTRS=addr=::1,clientaddr=::1 
OPTS=user=rleigh
% umount /mnt
umount.nfs4: /mnt: not found
umount.nfs4: /mnt: not found
% sudo umount /mnt


I'm permitted to mount, but not umount, the /mnt mount.  Not yet
found where the error lies, but the information to permit the
umount is certainly present.

Hope the above contains sufficient info to reproduce.


Regards,
Roger

-- 
  .''`.  Roger Leigh
 : :' :  Debian GNU/Linux http://people.debian.org/~rleigh/
 `. `'   Printing on GNU/Linux?   http://gutenprint.sourceforge.net/
   `-GPG Public Key: 0x25BFB848   Please GPG sign your mail.



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#653630: /sbin/mount.nfs: Re: nfs-common: Only root can unmount, nautilus badly confused

2012-01-22 Thread Pavel Yakunin
Package: nfs-common
Version: 1:1.2.5-3
Followup-For: Bug #653630

Dear Maintainer,


Seems that I have the same issue with nfs.

There is an entry in my fstab:
liveserv:/mnt/library//mnt/library   nfs 
noauto,user   0 0
I mount the nfs share as user without any problem:
$mount /mnt/library
Then I try to umount:
$umount /mnt/library
 umount: only root can unmount liveserv:/mnt/library/ from 
/mnt/library

Everything was working properly before the last dist-upgrade Jan 21 
2012 (I did the previos one on Jan 9 2012).
Just after the upgrade I've got the error: umount: /mnt/library mount 
disagrees with the fstab.
Then I managed to get rid of this error by putting a trailing slash to 
the fstab entry, but the error I mentioned above is still there.


Thanks,
Pavel Yakunin


-- Package-specific info:
-- rpcinfo --
   program vers proto   port
104   tcp111  portmapper
103   tcp111  portmapper
102   tcp111  portmapper
104   udp111  portmapper
103   udp111  portmapper
102   udp111  portmapper
1000241   udp  50933  status
1000241   tcp  48722  status
1000211   udp  57840  nlockmgr
1000213   udp  57840  nlockmgr
1000214   udp  57840  nlockmgr
1000211   tcp  37262  nlockmgr
1000213   tcp  37262  nlockmgr
1000214   tcp  37262  nlockmgr
-- /etc/default/nfs-common --
NEED_STATD=
STATDOPTS=
NEED_IDMAPD=
NEED_GSSD=
-- /etc/idmapd.conf --
[General]
Verbosity = 0
Pipefs-Directory = /var/lib/nfs/rpc_pipefs
[Mapping]
Nobody-User = nobody
Nobody-Group = nogroup
-- /etc/fstab --
liveserv:/mnt/library/mnt/library   nfs noauto,user   0 
0 
liveserv:/mnt/photo/  /mnt/photo  nfs noauto,user   0 0
liveserv:/mnt/backup/  /mnt/backup  nfs noauto,user   0 0
lserv:/mnt/music/ /mnt/lserv-music   nfs noauto,user
   0 0
lserv:/mnt/archive/ /mnt/archive   nfs noauto,user  
 0 0
lserv:/home//mnt/lserv-home  nfs noauto,user
   0 0
liveserv:/mnt/mirror/   /mnt/mirror nfs noauto,user 0 0
-- /proc/mounts --
rpc_pipefs /var/lib/nfs/rpc_pipefs rpc_pipefs rw,relatime 0 0
liveserv:/mnt/library/ /mnt/library nfs 
rw,relatime,vers=3,rsize=262144,wsize=262144,namlen=255,hard,proto=tcp,timeo=600,retrans=2,sec=sys,mountaddr=192.168.1.104,mountvers=3,mountport=46570,mountproto=udp,local_lock=none,addr=192.168.1.104
 0 0

-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 3.1.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

Versions of packages nfs-common depends on:
ii  adduser 3.113
ii  initscripts 2.88dsf-18
ii  libc6   2.13-24
ii  libcap2 1:2.22-1
ii  libcomerr2  1.42-1
ii  libdevmapper1.02.1  2:1.02.67-2
ii  libevent-2.0-5  2.0.16-stable-1
ii  libgssapi-krb5-21.10+dfsg~alpha2-1
ii  libgssglue1 0.3-4
ii  libk5crypto31.10+dfsg~alpha2-1
ii  libkeyutils11.5.2-2
ii  libkrb5-3   1.10+dfsg~alpha2-1
ii  libnfsidmap20.25-1
ii  libtirpc1   0.2.2-5
ii  libwrap07.6.q-22
ii  lsb-base3.2-28
ii  rpcbind 0.2.0-7
ii  ucf 3.0025+nmu2

Versions of packages nfs-common recommends:
ii  python  2.7.2-9

nfs-common suggests no packages.

-- no debconf information



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#653630: /sbin/mount.nfs: Re: nfs-common: Only root can unmount, nautilus badly confused

2012-01-22 Thread Luk Claes
On 01/22/2012 11:34 AM, Pavel Yakunin wrote:

 Seems that I have the same issue with nfs.
 
 There is an entry in my fstab:
 liveserv:/mnt/library//mnt/library   nfs 
 noauto,user   0 0
 I mount the nfs share as user without any problem:
 $mount /mnt/library
 Then I try to umount:
 $umount /mnt/library
  umount: only root can unmount liveserv:/mnt/library/ from 
 /mnt/library
 
 Everything was working properly before the last dist-upgrade Jan 21 
 2012 (I did the previos one on Jan 9 2012).
 Just after the upgrade I've got the error: umount: /mnt/library 
 mount disagrees with the fstab.
 Then I managed to get rid of this error by putting a trailing slash 
 to the fstab entry, but the error I mentioned above is still there.

According to below snippet that automatically was attached to your bug
report, the trailing slash is not in /etc/fstab?

Anyway this bug was introduced by the conversion of /etc/mtab (putting
Michael in Cc, maybe he has an idea how we should prevent this and
similar issues from happening).

 -- /etc/fstab --
 liveserv:/mnt/library/mnt/library   nfs noauto,user   
 0 0 
 liveserv:/mnt/photo/  /mnt/photo  nfs noauto,user   0  0
 liveserv:/mnt/backup/  /mnt/backup  nfs noauto,user   
 0 0
 lserv:/mnt/music/ /mnt/lserv-music   nfs noauto,user  
  0 0
 lserv:/mnt/archive/ /mnt/archive   nfs noauto,user
0 0
 lserv:/home//mnt/lserv-home  nfs noauto,user  
  0 0
 liveserv:/mnt/mirror/ /mnt/mirror nfs noauto,user 0 0
 -- /proc/mounts --
 rpc_pipefs /var/lib/nfs/rpc_pipefs rpc_pipefs rw,relatime 0 0
 liveserv:/mnt/library/ /mnt/library nfs 
 rw,relatime,vers=3,rsize=262144,wsize=262144,namlen=255,hard,proto=tcp,timeo=600,retrans=2,sec=sys,mountaddr=192.168.1.104,mountvers=3,mountport=46570,mountproto=udp,local_lock=none,addr=192.168.1.104
  0 0

Cheers

Luk



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#653630: /sbin/mount.nfs: Re: nfs-common: Only root can unmount, nautilus badly confused

2012-01-22 Thread Pavel Yakunin

Thanks, Luk.


According to below snippet that automatically was attached to your bug
report, the trailing slash is not in /etc/fstab?



Sorry, I've tried different variants of fstab to fix the issue, so that 
there is no trailing slash in the first line of the attached fstab. But 
the mount behavior is the same for all of the nfs entries in my fstab.


Best regards,
Pavel



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#653630: /sbin/mount.nfs: Re: nfs-common: Only root can unmount, nautilus badly confused

2012-01-22 Thread Michael Biebl
On 22.01.2012 12:30, Luk Claes wrote:
 -- /etc/fstab --
 liveserv:/mnt/library/mnt/library   nfs noauto,user  
  0 0 
 -- /proc/mounts --
 liveserv:/mnt/library/ /mnt/library nfs 
 rw,relatime,vers=3,rsize=262144,wsize=262144,namlen=255,hard,proto=tcp,timeo=600,retrans=2,sec=sys,mountaddr=192.168.1.104,mountvers=3,mountport=46570,mountproto=udp,local_lock=none,addr=192.168.1.104
  0 0

I am missing a bit of context here. Is the problem related to the user
option or regarding a trailing /?

wrt /etc/mtab being a symlink to /proc/mounts: I assume mount.nfs is
built against libmount, seeing [1] as fixed? Do you get a file
/run/mount/utab when the nfs share is mounted? What does it contain?



[1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=626478
-- 
Why is it that all of the instruments seeking intelligent life in the
universe are pointed away from Earth?



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Bug#653630: /sbin/mount.nfs: Re: nfs-common: Only root can unmount, nautilus badly confused

2012-01-22 Thread Pavel Yakunin


There was two problems after update, but the first one (umount: 
/mnt/library mount disagrees with the fstab) can be easily solved by 
the trailing slash. The reason why I mentioned it here is that it may be 
useful to know that it came along with the main unsolved problem with 
the user option (umount: only root can unmount liveserv:/mnt/library/ 
from /mnt/library). So the problem is related to user option.


On 2012-01-22 15:55, Michael Biebl wrote:

On 22.01.2012 12:30, Luk Claes wrote:

-- /etc/fstab --
liveserv:/mnt/library/mnt/library   nfs noauto,user   0 0
-- /proc/mounts --
liveserv:/mnt/library/ /mnt/library nfs 
rw,relatime,vers=3,rsize=262144,wsize=262144,namlen=255,hard,proto=tcp,timeo=600,retrans=2,sec=sys,mountaddr=192.168.1.104,mountvers=3,mountport=46570,mountproto=udp,local_lock=none,addr=192.168.1.104
 0 0


I am missing a bit of context here. Is the problem related to the user
option or regarding a trailing /?

wrt /etc/mtab being a symlink to /proc/mounts: I assume mount.nfs is
built against libmount, seeing [1] as fixed? Do you get a file
/run/mount/utab when the nfs share is mounted? What does it contain?



[1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=626478




--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#653630: /sbin/mount.nfs: Re: nfs-common: Only root can unmount, nautilus badly confused

2012-01-22 Thread Roger Leigh
On Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at 12:55:45PM +0100, Michael Biebl wrote:
 On 22.01.2012 12:30, Luk Claes wrote:
  -- /etc/fstab --
  liveserv:/mnt/library/mnt/library   nfs noauto,user
 0 0 
  -- /proc/mounts --
  liveserv:/mnt/library/ /mnt/library nfs 
  rw,relatime,vers=3,rsize=262144,wsize=262144,namlen=255,hard,proto=tcp,timeo=600,retrans=2,sec=sys,mountaddr=192.168.1.104,mountvers=3,mountport=46570,mountproto=udp,local_lock=none,addr=192.168.1.104
   0 0
 
 I am missing a bit of context here. Is the problem related to the user
 option or regarding a trailing /?
 
 wrt /etc/mtab being a symlink to /proc/mounts: I assume mount.nfs is
 built against libmount, seeing [1] as fixed? Do you get a file
 /run/mount/utab when the nfs share is mounted? What does it contain?

I'm afraid I can't help with the specifics immediately (I'll need
to set up some NFS mounts), but some general comments about the
recent changes:

- if you mount a filesystem with the user option, the user who
  mounted it will be written to /run/mount/utab.  While I've not
  tested this for NFS, it's certainly the case for all other mounts.

- when umounting a filesystem, the content of /etc/fstab should be
  irrelevant.  The information needed is in /etc/mtab (/proc/mounts)
  and /run/mount/utab.  If the NFS mount helpers are using fstab
  during umount, I think that's a separate bug in its own right.

- the trailing / may be an issue.  Does the entry (if any) in
  /run/mount/utab match this?  Does adding a trailing / to the
  umount command affect things?

Regards,
Roger

-- 
  .''`.  Roger Leigh
 : :' :  Debian GNU/Linux http://people.debian.org/~rleigh/
 `. `'   Printing on GNU/Linux?   http://gutenprint.sourceforge.net/
   `-GPG Public Key: 0x25BFB848   Please GPG sign your mail.



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#653630: /sbin/mount.nfs: Re: nfs-common: Only root can unmount, nautilus badly confused

2012-01-22 Thread Roger Leigh
On Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at 12:34:39PM +, Roger Leigh wrote:
 On Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at 12:55:45PM +0100, Michael Biebl wrote:
  On 22.01.2012 12:30, Luk Claes wrote:
   -- /etc/fstab --
   liveserv:/mnt/library/mnt/library   nfs noauto,user  
0 0 
   -- /proc/mounts --
   liveserv:/mnt/library/ /mnt/library nfs 
   rw,relatime,vers=3,rsize=262144,wsize=262144,namlen=255,hard,proto=tcp,timeo=600,retrans=2,sec=sys,mountaddr=192.168.1.104,mountvers=3,mountport=46570,mountproto=udp,local_lock=none,addr=192.168.1.104
0 0
  
  I am missing a bit of context here. Is the problem related to the user
  option or regarding a trailing /?
  
  wrt /etc/mtab being a symlink to /proc/mounts: I assume mount.nfs is
  built against libmount, seeing [1] as fixed? Do you get a file
  /run/mount/utab when the nfs share is mounted? What does it contain?
 
 I'm afraid I can't help with the specifics immediately (I'll need
 to set up some NFS mounts), but some general comments about the
 recent changes:
 
 - if you mount a filesystem with the user option, the user who
   mounted it will be written to /run/mount/utab.  While I've not
   tested this for NFS, it's certainly the case for all other mounts.

A quick test with NFS4 showed that /run/mount/utab does not contain
anything, and additionally it looks like mount.nfs4 is /not/ linked
against libmount, which I thought (perhaps mistakenly, unless it's
a regression) was now using libmount.

NFS certainly does support libmount, it's right there in the
configure script.  Looks like it just needs adding to the Build-Deps
and enabling in debian/rules by configuring with
--enable-libmount-mount.  I would highly recommend that the nfs-common
enable this as soon as possible!


Regards,
Roger

-- 
  .''`.  Roger Leigh
 : :' :  Debian GNU/Linux http://people.debian.org/~rleigh/
 `. `'   Printing on GNU/Linux?   http://gutenprint.sourceforge.net/
   `-GPG Public Key: 0x25BFB848   Please GPG sign your mail.



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#653630: /sbin/mount.nfs: Re: nfs-common: Only root can unmount, nautilus badly confused

2012-01-22 Thread Pavel Yakunin


I've tried:

- /run/mount/utab is empty even when my NFS share is mounted by user.
- corresponding entry in /etc/mtab is liveserv:/mnt/library/ 
/mnt/library nfs 
rw,relatime,vers=3,rsize=262144,wsize=262144,namlen=255,hard,proto=tcp,timeo=600,retrans=2,sec=sys,mountaddr=192.168.1.104,mountvers=3,mountport=46570,mountproto=udp,local_lock=none,addr=192.168.1.104 
0 0 and it's indifferent to the trailing slash in /etc/fstab. But if 
there is no trailing slash in the fstab, another error message accurs 
umount: /mnt/library mount disagrees with the fstab (in this  case 
fstab and mtab entries are different).




- if you mount a filesystem with the user option, the user who
   mounted it will be written to /run/mount/utab.  While I've not
   tested this for NFS, it's certainly the case for all other mounts.

- when umounting a filesystem, the content of /etc/fstab should be
   irrelevant.  The information needed is in /etc/mtab (/proc/mounts)
   and /run/mount/utab.  If the NFS mount helpers are using fstab
   during umount, I think that's a separate bug in its own right.

- the trailing / may be an issue.  Does the entry (if any) in
   /run/mount/utab match this?  Does adding a trailing / to the
   umount command affect things?

Regards,
Roger





--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#653630: /sbin/mount.nfs: Re: nfs-common: Only root can unmount, nautilus badly confused

2012-01-22 Thread Michael Biebl
 On Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at 12:55:45PM +0100, Michael Biebl wrote:

 I am missing a bit of context here. Is the problem related to the user
 option or regarding a trailing /?


The trailing / might be a red herring. I've tried the following:

as root
1/ mkdir /foo /bar
2/ echo /foo /bar none bind,user 0 0  /etc/fstab
as user
1/ mount /bar (successful)
2/ umount /bar
umount: /bar mount disagrees with the fstab
(umount as root works without problems)

When /bar is mounted, I get:

# cat /run/mount/utab
SRC=/dev/disk/by-uuid/5c503ec2-6528-44bb-9ff5-aa2687aa9706 TARGET=/bar 
ROOT=/foo BINDSRC=/foo OPTS=user=michael
(looks ok)

# findmnt /bar/
TARGET SOURCE   FSTYPE 
OPTIONS
/bar   /dev/disk/by-uuid/5c503ec2-6528-44bb-9ff5-aa2687aa9706[/foo] ext4   
rw,relatime,errors=remount-ro,user_xattr,acl,barrier=1,data=ordered
(I'd expect the user option to be set)

# cat /proc/mounts | grep /bar
/dev/disk/by-uuid/5c503ec2-6528-44bb-9ff5-aa2687aa9706 /bar ext4 
rw,relatime,errors=remount-ro,user_xattr,acl,barrier=1,data=ordered 0 0

When I do
as root
1/ rm /etc/mtab
2/ touch /etc/mtab
as user
1/ mount /bar
2/ mount
/foo on /bar type none (rw,noexec,nosuid,nodev,bind,user=michael)
3/ umount /bar

everything works as expected.

So it looks like something's fishy going on here

-- 
Why is it that all of the instruments seeking intelligent life in the
universe are pointed away from Earth?



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Bug#653630: /sbin/mount.nfs: Re: nfs-common: Only root can unmount, nautilus badly confused

2012-01-22 Thread Luk Claes
On 01/22/2012 01:53 PM, Roger Leigh wrote:
 On Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at 12:34:39PM +, Roger Leigh wrote:
 On Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at 12:55:45PM +0100, Michael Biebl wrote:
 On 22.01.2012 12:30, Luk Claes wrote:
 -- /etc/fstab --
 liveserv:/mnt/library/mnt/library   nfs noauto,user   
 0 0 
 -- /proc/mounts --
 liveserv:/mnt/library/ /mnt/library nfs 
 rw,relatime,vers=3,rsize=262144,wsize=262144,namlen=255,hard,proto=tcp,timeo=600,retrans=2,sec=sys,mountaddr=192.168.1.104,mountvers=3,mountport=46570,mountproto=udp,local_lock=none,addr=192.168.1.104
  0 0

 I am missing a bit of context here. Is the problem related to the user
 option or regarding a trailing /?

 wrt /etc/mtab being a symlink to /proc/mounts: I assume mount.nfs is
 built against libmount, seeing [1] as fixed? Do you get a file
 /run/mount/utab when the nfs share is mounted? What does it contain?

 I'm afraid I can't help with the specifics immediately (I'll need
 to set up some NFS mounts), but some general comments about the
 recent changes:

 - if you mount a filesystem with the user option, the user who
   mounted it will be written to /run/mount/utab.  While I've not
   tested this for NFS, it's certainly the case for all other mounts.
 
 A quick test with NFS4 showed that /run/mount/utab does not contain
 anything, and additionally it looks like mount.nfs4 is /not/ linked
 against libmount, which I thought (perhaps mistakenly, unless it's
 a regression) was now using libmount.
 
 NFS certainly does support libmount, it's right there in the
 configure script.  Looks like it just needs adding to the Build-Deps
 and enabling in debian/rules by configuring with
 --enable-libmount-mount.  I would highly recommend that the nfs-common
 enable this as soon as possible!

Hmm, apparently there was some confusion from my part: I did not expect
to have to explicitly build depend on libmount-dev as libblkid-dev has a
similar description I thought one would replace the other. I also did
not expect I had to explicitly enable libmount via configure as
configure has default --enable-mount=yes and --enable-libmount-mount
same as --enable-mount. Apparently only when explicitly setting
--enable-mount=yes, it would also be set for --enable-libmount-mount.

Anyway, I have explicitly enabled it now (and added the build dependency).

Pavel: Can you have a look if the new version from unstable fixes your
problem (this bug)?

Cheers

Luk



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#653630: /sbin/mount.nfs: Re: nfs-common: Only root can unmount, nautilus badly confused

2012-01-22 Thread Pavel Yakunin





Pavel: Can you have a look if the new version from unstable fixes your
problem (this bug)?

Cheers

Luk


Luk, did you push the new version in the sid repo? (or maybe I should 
wait for a while? I used us.debian.org mirror). Apt tell me that nothing 
is changed:

apt-get install nfs-common/sid
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
nfs-common is already the newest version.
Selected version '1:1.2.5-3' (Debian:testing [amd64]) for 'nfs-common'
0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded.

actually I've tried to install the package from sid manually, but this 
didn't affect the problem with umount.


Thanks,
Pavel.



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#653630: /sbin/mount.nfs: Re: nfs-common: Only root can unmount, nautilus badly confused

2012-01-22 Thread Luk Claes
On 01/22/2012 09:32 PM, Pavel Yakunin wrote:
 
 

 Pavel: Can you have a look if the new version from unstable fixes your
 problem (this bug)?

 Luk, did you push the new version in the sid repo? (or maybe I should
 wait for a while? I used us.debian.org mirror). Apt tell me that nothing

Yes, version 1:1.2.5-4. It was probably not pushed to the mirrors yet.

Can you test if it fixes the bug, thanks already?

Luk





-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#653630: /sbin/mount.nfs: Re: nfs-common: Only root can unmount, nautilus badly confused

2012-01-22 Thread Pavel Yakunin




Can you test if it fixes the bug, thanks already?

Luk


I've obtained the new version. Now everything is all right,
Thanks a lot.

Pavel.



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org