tag 666775 pending
thanks
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 01:22:45AM -0700, Keith Rarick wrote:
Ok, I believe this is fixed now in
[..]
If this looks good, I'm set to make a release.
Thanks Keith. I've verified the fix on ppc, sparc mips. Please go ahead with
a release.
--
Every great idea is
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 12:07 AM, Serafeim Zanikolas s...@debian.org wrote:
Thanks Keith. I've verified the fix on ppc, sparc mips. Please go ahead with
a release.
Done.
http://kr.github.com/beanstalkd/2012/09/11/1.7-release-notes.html
Thanks for all the help with this, and for your
On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 1:43 AM, Serafeim Zanikolas s...@debian.org wrote:
Going back to the subject of the bug report, please let me know when you have
a potential fix for the failing tests, and I'll test it on whatever arches you
don't have access to.
Ok, I believe this is fixed now in
On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 1:43 AM, Serafeim Zanikolas s...@debian.org wrote:
Going back to the subject of the bug report, please let me know when you have
a potential fix for the failing tests, and I'll test it on whatever arches you
don't have access to.
Will do.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
[adding back bug report in CC]
On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 02:31:47PM -0700, Keith Rarick wrote:
On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 6:09 AM, Serafeim Zanikolas s...@debian.org wrote:
I'm happy to keep 1.4 if you as upstream commit to support it for serious
bug
and security issues for another 3+ years.
Hi Keith,
Thanks for the prompt response.
On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 10:09:09PM -0700, Keith Rarick wrote:
On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 6:29 AM, Serafeim Zanikolas s...@debian.org wrote:
Since I haven't heard from you on a fix for 1.6, 1.5 tests never ran
successfully, and I do not wish to keep 1.4
Hi Keith,
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 12:45:14AM +0200, Serafeim Zanikolas wrote:
Hi Keith,
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 01:34:48AM +0200, Serafeim Zanikolas wrote:
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 07:08:38PM -0700, Keith Rarick wrote:
On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 11:35 AM, Serafeim Zanikolas s...@debian.org
On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 6:29 AM, Serafeim Zanikolas s...@debian.org wrote:
Since I haven't heard from you on a fix for 1.6, 1.5 tests never ran
successfully, and I do not wish to keep 1.4 in the next Debian stable release,
I'm going to request the removal of beanstalkd from the Debian archive.
Hi Keith,
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 01:34:48AM +0200, Serafeim Zanikolas wrote:
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 07:08:38PM -0700, Keith Rarick wrote:
On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 11:35 AM, Serafeim Zanikolas s...@debian.org
wrote:
I've uploaded 1.6 but many tests fail with a timeout in powerpc s390(x)
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 07:08:38PM -0700, Keith Rarick wrote:
On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 11:35 AM, Serafeim Zanikolas s...@debian.org wrote:
I've uploaded 1.6 but many tests fail with a timeout in powerpc s390(x)
Looks like it fails on all the big-endian architectures.
Debugging this would be
On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 11:35 AM, Serafeim Zanikolas s...@debian.org wrote:
I've uploaded 1.6 but many tests fail with a timeout in powerpc s390(x)
Looks like it fails on all the big-endian architectures.
Debugging this would be much easier if I had access
to a big-endian machine. I'll work on
Hi Keith,
On Tue, May 08, 2012 at 05:36:32AM +, Keith Rarick wrote [edited]:
[..]
I'll make another release as soon as I can fix
https://github.com/kr/beanstalkd/issues/114
I've uploaded 1.6 but many tests fail with a timeout in powerpc s390(x), as
of now at least. For the full list of
hi keith,
make check from latest git passes on x86_64 running Linux 2.6.32-5-amd64; I
ran it half a dozen times, since we're dealing with a race condition (but you
never know obviously)
with the whole reorg of tests, I'm not even sure though which tests are still
in place (fwiw the one failing
Awesome, thanks!
I made sure to keep all the existing tests that weren't
redundant or otherwise nonsensical. The binlog sizelimit
test is now a function in integ-test.c.
I'll make another release as soon as I can fix
https://github.com/kr/beanstalkd/issues/114
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
14 matches
Mail list logo
