Bug#679479: bacula-fd fails to start because network is not initialized

2014-12-01 Thread Carsten Leonhardt
Dear Tom, is (or was, as your bug report is over 2 years old now) there a specific reason why you had the FDAddress = faerun.epperly.home directive in your bacula-fd.conf? Just omitting the directive should (have) give(n) you a functioning backup. Yours, Carsten -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Bug#679479: bacula-fd fails to start because network is not initialized

2014-12-01 Thread Tom Epperly
I think I based my configuration file on the documentation and examples that were available at the time. Tom On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 10:41 AM, Carsten Leonhardt l...@carotec.de wrote: Dear Tom, is (or was, as your bug report is over 2 years old now) there a specific reason why you had the

Bug#679479: [pkg-bacula-devel] Bug#679479: bacula-fd fails to start because network is not initialized

2014-12-01 Thread Geert Stappers
On Mon, Dec 01, 2014 at 01:04:34PM -0800, Tom Epperly wrote: On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 10:41 AM, Carsten Leonhardt l...@carotec.de wrote: Dear Tom, is (or was, as your bug report is over 2 years old now) there a specific reason why you had the FDAddress = faerun.epperly.home directive in

Bug#679479: bacula-fd fails to start because network is not initialized

2014-12-01 Thread Carsten Leonhardt
Dear Tom, I think I based my configuration file on the documentation and examples that were available at the time. I'm guessing that you either resolved the problem or gave up on bacula by now? If you agree that the problem was in the configuration of your system, I'd like to close this bug

Bug#679479: [pkg-bacula-devel] Bug#679479: bacula-fd fails to start because network is not initialized

2014-12-01 Thread Tom Epperly
From my perspective, it seems like there must be a class of system services that need to be started after the network is configured and DNS is available. Bacula and other members of that class of services should have a common mechanism to be started after network+DNS are available. I think my

Bug#679479: [pkg-bacula-devel] Bug#679479: bacula-fd fails to start because network is not initialized

2012-07-08 Thread Alexander Golovko
Hi! Sorry for reply delay. There is not a bug, so all we can do - add some information about this case into README.Debian. You can try one of next workarounds: 1. Allow bacula-fd to listen on all addresses - remove line FDAddress = .. or change it to FDAddress = 0.0.0.0 2. If you

Bug#679479: [pkg-bacula-devel] Bug#679479: bacula-fd fails to start because network is not initialized

2012-07-08 Thread Tom Epperly
Thanks for your reply. I understand from a developer's perspective that there is no bug. Somewhere along the line, I believe a Debian upgrade switched me from using /etc/network/interfaces and ifupdown to using NetworkManager. It happened a while ago, so I don't remember how it all happened. At

Bug#679479: [pkg-bacula-devel] Bug#679479: Bug#679479: bacula-fd fails to start because network is not initialized

2012-07-08 Thread Alexander Golovko
Yes, you are right. This is the same trouble in samba package: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=669891 It is not a bug in package and not a bug in network-manager, but peoples unhappied :) Can you try to add /usr/bin/nm-online call into /etc/default/bacula-fd and check,

Bug#679479: bacula-fd fails to start because network is not initialized

2012-06-28 Thread Tom Epperly
Package: bacula-fd Version: 5.2.6+dfsg-1 Severity: normal Dear Maintainer, bacula-fd does not start when I boot my machine. I am not sure which upgrade stopped bacula-fd, but it hasn't been working for a while. My machine used to use ifup/ifdown to manage initializing eth1 and initiating