Bug#701161: closed by Dimitrios Eftaxiopoulos eftax...@otenet.gr (Bug#701161: fixed in freefem++ 3.25-1)

2013-09-12 Thread Helmut Grohne
Control: reopen -1
Control: found -1 freefem++/3.25-1

On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 10:06:14PM +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
 #701161: freefem++: /usr/bin/FreeFem++ and /usr/bin/FreeFem++nw are the same 
 files
 
 It has been closed by Dimitrios Eftaxiopoulos eftax...@otenet.gr.
  freefem++ (3.25-1) unstable; urgency=low
  .
[ Dimitrios Eftaxiopoulos ]
* Imported Upstream version 3.25 (Closes: #701161 #706714)

It is not clear to me in what way the new upstream version fixes an
issue in the packaging. In any case the reported issue is fully present
as can be seen on the updated dedup report[1]. Did you mistake this bug
number for another?

I already gave a command to be added to debian/rules as a proposed
solution. Has that been insufficient for some reason?

Helmut

[1] http://dedup.debian.net/compare/freefem++/freefem++


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#701161: closed by Dimitrios Eftaxiopoulos eftax...@otenet.gr (Bug#701161: fixed in freefem++ 3.25-1)

2013-09-12 Thread Dimitrios Eftaxiopoulos
Before the 3.25-1 version upload, I included a fix for the duplication in the 
rules file according to 
your suggestion and to what is documented in in [1].

Test build logs yielded the info, generated from the upstream configure script, 
that the 
executables are

configure: progs: FreeFem++-nw bamg  cvmsh2  FreeFem++-mpi ffmedit ffglut 

I wrongly thought that the FreeFem++ executable was not generated and that the 
duplication 
had been dealt with by upstream. Hence I commented out the relevant lines in 
the rules file.

Shortly I will upload a new 3.25-2 version which I hope will fix the problem.

Best regards
Dimitris

[1] dedup Wiki[1] 

Στις Πεμ 12 Σεπτ 2013 07:58:01 Helmut Grohne έγραψε:
 Control: reopen -1
 Control: found -1 freefem++/3.25-1
 
 On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 10:06:14PM +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
  #701161: freefem++: /usr/bin/FreeFem++ and /usr/bin/FreeFem++nw are the
  same files
  
  It has been closed by Dimitrios Eftaxiopoulos eftax...@otenet.gr.
  
   freefem++ (3.25-1) unstable; urgency=low
   .
   
 [ Dimitrios Eftaxiopoulos ]
 * Imported Upstream version 3.25 (Closes: #701161 #706714)
 
 It is not clear to me in what way the new upstream version fixes an
 issue in the packaging. In any case the reported issue is fully present
 as can be seen on the updated dedup report[1]. Did you mistake this bug
 number for another?
 
 I already gave a command to be added to debian/rules as a proposed
 solution. Has that been insufficient for some reason?
 
 Helmut
 
 [1] http://dedup.debian.net/compare/freefem++/freefem++


[1] https://wiki.debian.org/dedup.debian.net


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.