Bug#787861: review: polyml

2015-10-17 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
it is fine, the first upload is always tricky, after things are easier :) cheers, G. Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android From:"James Clarke" Date:Sat, 17 Oct, 2015 at 17:33 Subject:Bug#787861: review: polyml Hi Gianfranco, >> I have uploaded 5.5.2-2 to mentors (and updated my git repository)

Bug#787861: review: polyml

2015-10-17 Thread James Clarke
Hi Gianfranco, >> I have uploaded 5.5.2-2 to mentors (and updated my git repository) enabling >> all hardening flags. I also realised that the new polyc shell script >> requires gcc and >libffi-dev to produce standalone executables, so I have >> added those as dependencies for polyml. > > wond

Bug#787861: review: polyml

2015-10-17 Thread James Clarke
Hi Gianfranco, > I sponsored the package Thank you again for all your help. > (BTW I was intending to subscribe to debian-science, but also debian-devel is > nice to be subscribed) I have subscribed to debian-science as well. > However, I would appreciate a fix for the following missing flags

Bug#787861: review: polyml

2015-10-15 Thread James Clarke
Hi Gianfranco, Apologies for the duplicate message, but I forgot to Cc the bug and debian-science. > well, for sure I suggest you to subscribe to debian-devel mail list and to > the package [1] at the bottom of the page. Done (although to the digest for debian-devel!) > you can also contact M

Bug#787861: review: polyml

2015-10-15 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
Hi, >I have uploaded the latest version to mentors. Currently, the old maintainers >are still listed in debian/control. I’m happy to assume responsibility for bug >>reports etc, so do I need to add myself to Uploaders? I don’t want to tread >on anyone’s toes though if that’s bad form. well, fo

Bug#787861: review: polyml

2015-10-15 Thread James Clarke
Hi Gianfranco, > On 15 Oct 2015, at 10:56, Gianfranco Costamagna > wrote: > > Hi James > > >> I have uploaded 5.5.2-1~rc2 to mentors. > > > > please call it 5.5.2-1 and nothing more :) > you can push the same version many times on mentors with no problems. Changed >> 1) Do I need to send

Bug#787861: review: polyml

2015-10-15 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
Hi James >I have uploaded 5.5.2-1~rc2 to mentors. please call it 5.5.2-1 and nothing more :) you can push the same version many times on mentors with no problems. >1) Do I need to send a separate email to this then? I also filed #801793 for a >transition, but that has already been closed as u

Bug#787861: review: polyml

2015-10-14 Thread James Clarke
Hi Gianfranco, I have uploaded 5.5.2-1~rc2 to mentors. 1) Do I need to send a separate email to this then? I also filed #801793 for a transition, but that has already been closed as unnecessary since there are no rdeps. 2) Added 6) The compiler is indeed forcing your code to be linked against

Bug#787861: review: polyml

2015-10-14 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
Hi James, >Thank you for continuing to look at this. I have just uploaded the newest >version (5.5.2-1~rc1) to https://mentors.debian.net/package/polyml. thanks to you for caring! >1) I have sent a request to join debian-science. Presumably I should wait >until the package is ready to be upl

Bug#787861: review: polyml

2015-10-13 Thread James Clarke
Hi Gianfranco, Thank you for continuing to look at this. I have just uploaded the newest version (5.5.2-1~rc1) to https://mentors.debian.net/package/polyml. 1) I have sent a request to join debian-science. Presumably I should wait until the package is ready to be uploaded before requesting an up

Bug#787861: review: polyml

2015-10-13 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
Control: owner -1 ! Control: tags -1 moreinfo Hi James, 1) please join the debian-science team and ask them an ack for the upload 2) please convert in team upload the package 3) please close 561763 in the changelog 4) please merge the two changelogs together 5) please remove rules.old 6) the po

Bug#787861: review: polyml

2015-10-07 Thread James Clarke
Hi, I believe I have addressed the changes you mentioned in http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/polyml/polyml_5.5.2-0.2.dsc, and would be grateful if you could please review it. Thanks, James > On 6 Oct 2015, at 10:54, James Clarke wrote: > > Firstly sorry for not replying, I hadn’t

Bug#787861: review: polyml

2015-10-06 Thread James Clarke
Firstly sorry for not replying, I hadn’t subscribed to the bug so I was never emailed a copy of your message. I figured it wasn’t really common to have NMUs like this, but given the fact that the package is not orphaned but its maintainers have not replied to bug reports, I thought this was one

Bug#787861: review: polyml

2015-09-25 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi, this is really too much for an NMU. Did you test reverse dependencies? you are bumping shlibs, so you need to be sure to have requested a transition slot on release.debian.org (use reportbug against it to ask one). I would do rather a team upl