Hi,
On 18/04/2016 11:48, Paul Wise wrote:
On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 4:00 AM, Julien Puydt wrote:
Uh... isn't that something more for upstream than for me?
Again, that's for upstream.
Yes, however it would be great if you could file bugs/patches and or
work with upstream to include those tools
On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 4:00 AM, Julien Puydt wrote:
> Uh... isn't that something more for upstream than for me?
> Again, that's for upstream.
Yes, however it would be great if you could file bugs/patches and or
work with upstream to include those tools into their QA procedures.
> See above :
Hi,
quite some time ago, Gianfranco wrote:
> something needs changes:
>
> - std-version is now 3.9.7
Done.
> - unsecure VCS fields
Done.
> - call ldconfig in rules? what?
Uh... removed.
> - changing names usually is just bad, people won't find the package,
> and you will diverge from
3 matches
Mail list logo
