On 2016-11-13 14:45:30 [+0100], Julian Wollrath wrote:
> I cannot do it myself but since the openssl transistion is ongoing now,
> maybe the wpa version from experimental, which fixes this bug, should
> be uploaded to unstable?
Andrew, any chance that this upload hits unstable? It won't work like
Hi,
I cannot do it myself but since the openssl transistion is ongoing now,
maybe the wpa version from experimental, which fixes this bug, should
be uploaded to unstable?
Cheers,
Julian
--
() ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail
/\- against proprietary
Hi,
for being able to build wpa 2.6, all that is needed is to refresh the
patches (as I did with the attached patch).
Cheers,
Juliandiff --git a/debian/patches/01_use_pkg-config_for_pcsc-lite_module.patch b/debian/patches/01_use_pkg-config_for_pcsc-lite_module.patch
index
Hi,
On 14 October 2016 at 23:36, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
wrote:
> On 2016-09-01 23:54:23 [+0200], Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
>> The latest build failed against 2.5-2+v2.4-2. I see that 2.5-3 is
>> prepared for experimental. Upstream's git seems to build against
On 2016-09-01 23:54:23 [+0200], Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> The latest build failed against 2.5-2+v2.4-2. I see that 2.5-3 is
> prepared for experimental. Upstream's git seems to build against openssl
> 1.1.0 (didn't test but the commits make it look like).
2.6 has been released almost two
On 2016-06-26 12:24:46 [+0200], Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> OpenSSL 1.1.0 is about to released. During a rebuild of all packages using
> OpenSSL this package fail to build. A log of that build can be found at:
>
Source: wpa
Version: 2.3-2.3
Severity: important
Control: block 827061 by -1
Hi,
OpenSSL 1.1.0 is about to released. During a rebuild of all packages using
OpenSSL this package fail to build. A log of that build can be found at:
7 matches
Mail list logo