Bug#831174: gcc-avr: diff for NMU version 1:4.9.2+Atmel3.5.0-1.1

2016-09-26 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
On 2016-09-25 20:10:47, Hakan Ardo wrote:
> I'm releaseing my version now, which I suppose cancels the NMU?

Thanks, great. Yes, this will cause the NMU to be rejected.

Cheers

> On Sun, Sep 25, 2016 at 12:36 PM, Sebastian Ramacher 
> wrote:
> 
> > On 2016-09-25 10:40:34, Hakan Ardo wrote:
> > > Thanx. I've got a version on the way that instead applies this upstream
> > fix
> > > for gcc 6 compatibility:
> > >
> > > https://gcc.gnu.org/git/?p=gcc.git;a=commitdiff;h=
> > ec1cc0263f156f70693a62cf17b254a0029f4852
> > >
> > > I would prefer to go with thatone unless you have strong reasons for your
> > > approach?
> >
> > No, not all. Just let me know if you prefer if I'd delay it longer or
> > cancel it
> > altogether.
> >
> > Cheers
> >
> > >
> > > On Sat, Sep 24, 2016 at 11:43 PM, Sebastian Ramacher <
> > sramac...@debian.org>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Control: tags 831174 + patch
> > > > Control: tags 831174 + pending
> > > >
> > > > Dear maintainer,
> > > >
> > > > I've prepared an NMU for gcc-avr (versioned as 1:4.9.2+Atmel3.5.0-1.1)
> > and
> > > > uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I
> > > > should delay it longer.
> > > >
> > > > Regards.
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Sebastian Ramacher
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Håkan Ardö
> >
> > --
> > Sebastian Ramacher
> >
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Håkan Ardö

-- 
Sebastian Ramacher


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Bug#831174: gcc-avr: diff for NMU version 1:4.9.2+Atmel3.5.0-1.1

2016-09-25 Thread Hakan Ardo
I'm releaseing my version now, which I suppose cancels the NMU?

On Sun, Sep 25, 2016 at 12:36 PM, Sebastian Ramacher 
wrote:

> On 2016-09-25 10:40:34, Hakan Ardo wrote:
> > Thanx. I've got a version on the way that instead applies this upstream
> fix
> > for gcc 6 compatibility:
> >
> > https://gcc.gnu.org/git/?p=gcc.git;a=commitdiff;h=
> ec1cc0263f156f70693a62cf17b254a0029f4852
> >
> > I would prefer to go with thatone unless you have strong reasons for your
> > approach?
>
> No, not all. Just let me know if you prefer if I'd delay it longer or
> cancel it
> altogether.
>
> Cheers
>
> >
> > On Sat, Sep 24, 2016 at 11:43 PM, Sebastian Ramacher <
> sramac...@debian.org>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Control: tags 831174 + patch
> > > Control: tags 831174 + pending
> > >
> > > Dear maintainer,
> > >
> > > I've prepared an NMU for gcc-avr (versioned as 1:4.9.2+Atmel3.5.0-1.1)
> and
> > > uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I
> > > should delay it longer.
> > >
> > > Regards.
> > >
> > > --
> > > Sebastian Ramacher
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Håkan Ardö
>
> --
> Sebastian Ramacher
>



-- 
Håkan Ardö


Bug#831174: gcc-avr: diff for NMU version 1:4.9.2+Atmel3.5.0-1.1

2016-09-25 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
On 2016-09-25 10:40:34, Hakan Ardo wrote:
> Thanx. I've got a version on the way that instead applies this upstream fix
> for gcc 6 compatibility:
> 
> https://gcc.gnu.org/git/?p=gcc.git;a=commitdiff;h=ec1cc0263f156f70693a62cf17b254a0029f4852
> 
> I would prefer to go with thatone unless you have strong reasons for your
> approach?

No, not all. Just let me know if you prefer if I'd delay it longer or cancel it
altogether.

Cheers

> 
> On Sat, Sep 24, 2016 at 11:43 PM, Sebastian Ramacher 
> wrote:
> 
> > Control: tags 831174 + patch
> > Control: tags 831174 + pending
> >
> > Dear maintainer,
> >
> > I've prepared an NMU for gcc-avr (versioned as 1:4.9.2+Atmel3.5.0-1.1) and
> > uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I
> > should delay it longer.
> >
> > Regards.
> >
> > --
> > Sebastian Ramacher
> >
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Håkan Ardö

-- 
Sebastian Ramacher


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Bug#831174: gcc-avr: diff for NMU version 1:4.9.2+Atmel3.5.0-1.1

2016-09-25 Thread Hakan Ardo
Thanx. I've got a version on the way that instead applies this upstream fix
for gcc 6 compatibility:

https://gcc.gnu.org/git/?p=gcc.git;a=commitdiff;h=ec1cc0263f156f70693a62cf17b254a0029f4852

I would prefer to go with thatone unless you have strong reasons for your
approach?

On Sat, Sep 24, 2016 at 11:43 PM, Sebastian Ramacher 
wrote:

> Control: tags 831174 + patch
> Control: tags 831174 + pending
>
> Dear maintainer,
>
> I've prepared an NMU for gcc-avr (versioned as 1:4.9.2+Atmel3.5.0-1.1) and
> uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I
> should delay it longer.
>
> Regards.
>
> --
> Sebastian Ramacher
>



-- 
Håkan Ardö


Bug#831174: gcc-avr: diff for NMU version 1:4.9.2+Atmel3.5.0-1.1

2016-09-24 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
Control: tags 831174 + patch
Control: tags 831174 + pending

Dear maintainer,

I've prepared an NMU for gcc-avr (versioned as 1:4.9.2+Atmel3.5.0-1.1) and
uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I
should delay it longer.

Regards.

-- 
Sebastian Ramacher
diff -u gcc-avr-4.9.2+Atmel3.5.0/debian/changelog gcc-avr-4.9.2+Atmel3.5.0/debian/changelog
--- gcc-avr-4.9.2+Atmel3.5.0/debian/changelog
+++ gcc-avr-4.9.2+Atmel3.5.0/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+gcc-avr (1:4.9.2+Atmel3.5.0-1.1) unstable; urgency=medium
+
+  * Non-maintainer upload.
+  * Remove an inlining attribute to fix build under GCC 6 (Closes: #831174)
+
+ -- Andreas Stührk   Sat, 24 Sep 2016 23:11:30 +0200
+
 gcc-avr (1:4.9.2+Atmel3.5.0-1) unstable; urgency=medium
 
   * New upstream release (closes: #790103)
diff -u gcc-avr-4.9.2+Atmel3.5.0/debian/patchlist gcc-avr-4.9.2+Atmel3.5.0/debian/patchlist
--- gcc-avr-4.9.2+Atmel3.5.0/debian/patchlist
+++ gcc-avr-4.9.2+Atmel3.5.0/debian/patchlist
@@ -1,0 +2 @@
+debian_patches/02_gcc6_fixes.diff
only in patch2:
unchanged:
--- gcc-avr-4.9.2+Atmel3.5.0.orig/debian/debian_patches/02_gcc6_fixes.diff
+++ gcc-avr-4.9.2+Atmel3.5.0/debian/debian_patches/02_gcc6_fixes.diff
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+--- gcc.org/cp/cfns.h	2016-09-24 22:42:26.30400 +0200
 gcc/cp/cfns.h	2016-09-24 22:43:03.32400 +0200
+@@ -122,12 +122,6 @@
+   return hval + asso_values[(unsigned char)str[len - 1]];
+ }
+ 
+-#ifdef __GNUC__
+-__inline
+-#ifdef __GNUC_STDC_INLINE__
+-__attribute__ ((__gnu_inline__))
+-#endif
+-#endif
+ const char *
+ libc_name_p (register const char *str, register unsigned int len)
+ {


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature