Bug#835360: rkt: FTBFS on several architectures

Hello Andreas, On Tue, 25 Oct 2016 13:25:18 +0200 Andreas Henriksson wrote: > As already mentioned the offending ppc64el binaries was removed. I just fixed created a debdiff to fix golang-github-shirou-gopsutil. https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=820466 I hope

Bug#835360: rkt: FTBFS on several architectures

Hello all. A final status update. As already mentioned the offending ppc64el binaries was removed. (Would be great in the future if gopsutil was changed from Arch: all to the architectures where it can actually parse process information on in reality.) This bug was also lowered in severity

Bug#835360: rkt: FTBFS on several architectures

On Friday, 14 October 2016 5:24:53 PM AEDT Andreas Henriksson wrote: > (Despite this debdiff, asking for removal could possibly be a better > idea as there's obviously not enough backing to properly support ppc64le > right now and thus probably not for the lifetime of stretch.) Andreas, thank you

Bug#835360: rkt: FTBFS on several architectures

Hello all. On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 01:29:31PM +, Luca BRUNO wrote: > On Thursday, 13 October 2016 13:59:27 UTC Andreas Henriksson wrote: > > > Fwiw, there's a chain of {build-,}dependencies that would need to be > > removed on ppc64el > > Ah, when I wrote my previous answer I didn't

Bug#835360: rkt: FTBFS on several architectures

On Thursday, 13 October 2016 13:59:27 UTC Andreas Henriksson wrote: > Fwiw, there's a chain of {build-,}dependencies that would need to be > removed on ppc64el Ah, when I wrote my previous answer I didn't realize that. Upon further inspection, it looks like it may be just enough to cherry-pick

Bug#835360: rkt: FTBFS on several architectures

Hello all. On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 10:42:37AM +, Luca BRUNO wrote: > On Thursday, 13 October 2016 21:18:07 UTC Dmitry Smirnov wrote: > > Rkt 1.16.0 FTBFS on ppc64el and s390x: > > > > https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=rkt > > > > Any ideas what we can do about it? > >

Bug#835360: rkt: FTBFS on several architectures

On Thursday, 13 October 2016 21:18:07 UTC Dmitry Smirnov wrote: > Rkt 1.16.0 FTBFS on ppc64el and s390x: > > https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=rkt > > Any ideas what we can do about it? s390(x) is not supported upstream for the moment, but this shouldn't be a blocker as it has

Bug#835360: rkt: FTBFS on several architectures

Rkt 1.16.0 FTBFS on ppc64el and s390x: https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=rkt Any ideas what we can do about it? -- Cheers, Dmitry Smirnov. --- Free speech is the bedrock of liberty and a free society. And yes, it includes the right to blaspheme and offend. -- Ayaan

Bug#835360: rkt: FTBFS on several architectures

On Tuesday, 11 October 2016 8:03:28 PM AEDT Andreas Henriksson wrote: > Excuse me for being very naive here, but this is my first encounter > with (packaging) go. > > The attached patch seems to make the appc-spec package build for me Awesome. Thank you very much Andreas. On my own I could not

Bug#835360: rkt: FTBFS on several architectures

On Tuesday, 11 October 2016 3:41:59 PM AEDT Jonathan Boulle wrote: > Dmitry, could you point me towards the "golang-github-appc-spec" 0.8.7 > FTBFS? Thank you for following our progress, Jonathan. This problem happened on my dev box when I tried to prepare new upload of appc-spec:

Bug#835360: rkt: FTBFS on several architectures

Hello all! On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 03:41:59PM +0200, Jonathan Boulle wrote: > Dmitry, could you point me towards the "golang-github-appc-spec" 0.8.7 > FTBFS? Excuse me for being very naive here, but this is my first encounter with (packaging) go. The attached patch seems to make the appc-spec

Bug#835360: rkt: FTBFS on several architectures

Dmitry, could you point me towards the "golang-github-appc-spec" 0.8.7 FTBFS? On 11 October 2016 at 04:24, Dmitry Smirnov wrote: > On Saturday, 8 October 2016 10:56:05 PM AEDT Andreas Henriksson wrote: > > Is there anything holding back uploading a new version (which should

Bug#835360: rkt: FTBFS on several architectures

On Saturday, 8 October 2016 10:56:05 PM AEDT Andreas Henriksson wrote: > Is there anything holding back uploading a new version (which should > resolve the issues)? Unfortunately rkt is held by "golang-github-appc-spec" 0.8.7 which FTBFS due to sub-vendored "go4.org/errorutil". At the moment I

Bug#835360: rkt: FTBFS on several architectures

Hello! On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 01:29:39AM +, Potter, Tim (HPE Linux Support) wrote: > PPC support looks like it has been added in rkt 1.14 and above [1]. > According to the > release notes on golang.org, experimental support has been added for s390 > systems > in Go 1.7. We're currently

Bug#835360: rkt: FTBFS on several architectures

On 29 Aug 2016, at 8:59 PM, Luca BRUNO wrote: > > 1.13.0+dfsg-1 has been built without issues on i386: > https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=rkt=i386=1.13.0%2Bdfsg-1=1472188080 > > ppc64 and s390x are in progress upstream and should hopefully > be back in the next

Bug#835360: rkt: FTBFS on several architectures

1.13.0+dfsg-1 has been built without issues on i386: https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=rkt=i386=1.13.0%2Bdfsg-1=1472188080 ppc64 and s390x are in progress upstream and should hopefully be back in the next releases. Ciao, Luca -- «Доверяй, но проверяй» signature.asc Description:

Bug#835360: rkt: FTBFS on several architectures

On Wednesday, 24 August 2016 8:50:33 PM AEST Adrian Bunk wrote: > The i386 failure looks like upstream #2926 (fixed in the 1.11.0 release), > the failures on other architectures look like similar problems that > require similar fixes. 1.13.0 still FTBFS on i386 for another reason:

Bug#835360: rkt: FTBFS on several architectures

Source: rkt Version: 1.10.0+dfsg-1 Severity: serious rkt FTBFS on several architectures: https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=rkt The i386 failure looks like upstream #2926 (fixed in the 1.11.0 release), the failures on other architectures look like similar problems that require