Bug#841146: diffoscope: Failure of test_superblock

2016-10-23 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
Control: tag -1 pending On Sun, Oct 23, 2016 at 05:00:27PM -0400, Leo Famulari wrote: > When I format the code correctly, the test is skipped and we can build > diffoscope successfully: cool! > > >> Though I'm using pytest 3.0.3. > > >> That test is skipped by using pytest.mark.skip(), which I

Bug#841146: diffoscope: Failure of test_superblock

2016-10-23 Thread Leo Famulari
On Sat, Oct 22, 2016 at 08:39:00PM +, HW42 wrote: > Leo Famulari: > > def skip_unless_tool_is_older_than(tool, actual_ver, min_ver, > > vcls=LooseVersion): > > if tools_missing(tool): > > -return pytest.mark.skip(reason="requires {}".format(tool)) > > +return

Bug#841146: diffoscope: Failure of test_superblock

2016-10-22 Thread HW42
Leo Famulari: > On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 04:23:51PM +, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: >> Though I'm using pytest 3.0.3. >> That test is skipped by using pytest.mark.skip(), which I don't see in >> the docs of pytest for 2.7. >> The changelog of pytest tells me pytest.mark.skip() is recognized as a >>

Bug#841146: diffoscope: Failure of test_superblock

2016-10-21 Thread Leo Famulari
On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 04:23:51PM +, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > Though I'm using pytest 3.0.3. > That test is skipped by using pytest.mark.skip(), which I don't see in > the docs of pytest for 2.7. > The changelog of pytest tells me pytest.mark.skip() is recognized as a > skipping marker

Bug#841146: diffoscope: Failure of test_superblock

2016-10-21 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 03:33:14PM -0400, Leo Famulari wrote: > > > === FAILURES > > > === > > > ___ test_superblock > > > > > > > > > differences = [] > > > > > >

Bug#841146: diffoscope: Failure of test_superblock

2016-10-18 Thread Leo Famulari
On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 06:02:38PM +, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > > === FAILURES > > === > > ___ test_superblock > > > > > > differences = [] > > > >

Bug#841146: diffoscope: Failure of test_superblock

2016-10-18 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
control: found -1 61 On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 10:28:33AM -0400, Leo Famulari wrote: > ... > tests/comparators/test_squashfs.py::test_identification PASSED > tests/comparators/test_squashfs.py::test_no_differences PASSED > tests/comparators/test_squashfs.py::test_no_warnings PASSED >

Bug#841146: diffoscope: Failure of test_superblock

2016-10-18 Thread Leo Famulari
On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 12:05:13PM +0100, Chris Lamb wrote: > Could you re-run the testsuite with: > > -vv -r sxX > > ... or similar? :) Many thanks. Using '-vvv -r sxX' with pytest 2.7.3, the output of the test suite is below. Please let me know if you need any more information.

Bug#841146: diffoscope: Failure of test_superblock

2016-10-18 Thread Chris Lamb
Hi, > diffoscope: Failure of test_superblock Could you re-run the testsuite with: -vv -r sxX ... or similar? :) Many thanks. Regards, -- ,''`. : :' : Chris Lamb `. `'` la...@debian.org / chris-lamb.co.uk `-

Bug#841146: diffoscope: Failure of test_superblock

2016-10-17 Thread Leo Famulari
Source: diffoscope Dear Maintainer, While building diffoscope 61 on GNU Guix's "core-updates" branch (roughly analogous to Debian's testing branch), the test test_superblock fails like this: === FAILURES ===