Bug#845281: mediawiki: backport version does not play well with extensions

2016-11-27 Thread Kunal Mehta
Hi, On 11/23/2016 11:11 PM, Marc Dequènes (duck) wrote: > Quack, > > On 2016-11-24 14:41, Kunal Mehta wrote: > >> This is somewhat intentional as the new package only contains some of >> those packages (those that are shipped by upstream as part of the >> tarball), while the mediawiki-extensions

Bug#845281: mediawiki: backport version does not play well with extensions

2016-11-23 Thread duck
Quack, On 2016-11-24 14:41, Kunal Mehta wrote: This is somewhat intentional as the new package only contains some of those packages (those that are shipped by upstream as part of the tarball), while the mediawiki-extensions-base package was a somewhat arbitrary list of extensions. I understan

Bug#845281: mediawiki: backport version does not play well with extensions

2016-11-23 Thread Kunal Mehta
Hi, On 11/21/2016 09:55 PM, Marc Dequènes (duck) wrote: > If you try to upgrade to the bpo version and you already add > mediawiki-extensions installed, the later is to be uninstalled. I > understand that the new mediawiki package replaces (and in fact > provides) the content of mediawiki-extensio

Bug#845281: mediawiki: backport version does not play well with extensions

2016-11-21 Thread duck
Package: mediawiki Version: 1:1.27.1-2~bpo8+1 Severity: important Quack, If you try to upgrade to the bpo version and you already add mediawiki-extensions installed, the later is to be uninstalled. I understand that the new mediawiki package replaces (and in fact provides) the content of med