Bug#850644: ITP: guix -- A functional package manager based on Scheme
Hi, Vagrant Cascadian writes: > Last I tried the packaging branch above it did actually work (with the > test suite results ignored), but that was a while ago. "me too". e65c5f7b did build successfully and works as far as I can tell; this is my first taste of guix. (I also use the script mentioned in [1] and did restarted systemd-sysusers once to make the build users available. Not sure if any of this is needed. A pointer to recommended readings would be nice.) Thank you for working on this. Regards, itd [1]: https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Guix#Manual_Installation
Bug#850644: ITP: guix -- A functional package manager based on Scheme
On 2020-09-21, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > On 17/04/20 at 17:25 -0700, Vagrant Cascadian wrote: >> All the build-depends are packaged and may as well call this an ITP now. >> Would still very much welcome help maintaining this, though! >> >> Packaging branch updated to 1.1.0: >> >> https://salsa.debian.org/vagrant/guix > > Any progress on this? We are considering deploying GUIX at $DAY_JOB and > I was wondering if this package could serve as a basis. Been struggling with the test suites, which make some guix specific assumptions and various other failures. Last I tried the packaging branch above it did actually work (with the test suite results ignored), but that was a while ago. I'd like to transition to guile-3.0, but a blocker for that is guile-gnutls test suite issues with recent versions of guile 3.x. The upcoming release of guix (whenever that might be) will actually include proper authentication of updates, which I think would be needed for uploading to anything other than experimental. I've been tempted to upload to experimental to try and get the NEW queue processing going while those issues get sorted out, but haven't had a lot of time or other excuse to work on it. Would love to see progress on it, though, if anyone could lend a hand! live well, vagrant signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#850644: ITP: guix -- A functional package manager based on Scheme
Hi Vagrant, On 17/04/20 at 17:25 -0700, Vagrant Cascadian wrote: > All the build-depends are packaged and may as well call this an ITP now. > Would still very much welcome help maintaining this, though! > > Packaging branch updated to 1.1.0: > > https://salsa.debian.org/vagrant/guix Any progress on this? We are considering deploying GUIX at $DAY_JOB and I was wondering if this package could serve as a basis. (No pressure intended) Thanks Lucas
Bug#850644: ITP: guix -- A functional package manager based on Scheme
Control: retitle 850644 ITP: guix -- A functional package manager based on Scheme All the build-depends are packaged and may as well call this an ITP now. Would still very much welcome help maintaining this, though! Packaging branch updated to 1.1.0: https://salsa.debian.org/vagrant/guix live well, vagrant signature.asc Description: PGP signature
