Bug#862051: Refer #862051 to ctte (WAS: nodejs-legacy: possibly drop this package, now that ax25-node has been removed?)

Le vendredi, 19 mai 2017, 11.05:28 h CEST Margarita Manterola a écrit : > This, compounded with the fact that the old node will be gone in stretch, > means that it makes sense for nodejs to become node. > > Does anyone think differently? I concur with your analysis; thank you for getting through

Bug#862051: Refer #862051 to ctte (WAS: nodejs-legacy: possibly drop this package, now that ax25-node has been removed?)

Philip Hands writes: > I presume we'd want to continue providing /usr/bin/nodejs for people > that have switched to using that, so that might as well continue to be > the name of the binary, since that gives us a 'node' symlink that is > self-documenting. That sounds plausible

Bug#862051: Refer #862051 to ctte (WAS: nodejs-legacy: possibly drop this package, now that ax25-node has been removed?)

Margarita Manterola writes: > Hi, > > Unfortunately the initial reassign message didn't make it to the debian-ctte > list, so quoting it here for context: > >> Control: retitle -1 Rename nodejs back to node for buster, now that >> ax25-node has been removed? > >> Dear

Bug#862051: Refer #862051 to ctte (WAS: nodejs-legacy: possibly drop this package, now that ax25-node has been removed?)

Hi, Unfortunately the initial reassign message didn't make it to the debian-ctte list, so quoting it here for context: > Control: retitle -1 Rename nodejs back to node for buster, now that > ax25-node has been removed? > Dear tech-ctte, > > In 2012, the decision was made to rename Node.js'

Bug#862051: Refer #862051 to ctte (WAS: nodejs-legacy: possibly drop this package, now that ax25-node has been removed?)

Control: reassign -1 tech-ctte Control: retitle -1 Rename nodejs back to node for buster, now that ax25-node has been removed? Dear tech-ctte, In 2012, the decision was made to rename Node.js' "node" name to nodejs-legacy, and transition the existing "node" package to ax25-node. However,