Bug#869586: botch: Fails ADT tests with python3.6

Control: retitle -1 botch FTBFS with Python 3.6 as default Control: severity -1 serious Control: tags -1 - moreinfo Control: found -1 0.21-4 On Sat, Aug 05, 2017 at 08:06:00PM +1200, Michael Hudson-Doyle wrote: > I guess we'll see what happens when Python 3.6 is made the default in > Debian. >...

Bug#869586: botch: Fails ADT tests with python3.6

I guess we'll see what happens when Python 3.6 is made the default in Debian. On 5 August 2017 at 17:59, Johannes Schauer wrote: > Quoting Michael Hudson-Doyle (2017-08-03 09:28:47) > > > I saw attached log but I cannot reproduce your findings in Debian. The > > > package

Bug#869586: botch: Fails ADT tests with python3.6

Quoting Michael Hudson-Doyle (2017-08-03 09:28:47) > > I saw attached log but I cannot reproduce your findings in Debian. The > > package builds fine and passes its autopkgtests. > Python 3.6 is not yet the default in debian is it? You could try sbuild -d > sid --extra-package or something like

Bug#869586: botch: Fails ADT tests with python3.6

On 3 August 2017 at 17:28, Johannes Schauer wrote: > Control: tag -1 + moreinfo > > Hi, > > On Mon, 24 Jul 2017 16:01:58 +0100 Dimitri John Ledkov > wrote: > > botch fails ADT tests with python3.6. On the surface the output looks > sane, > > and it's not just

Bug#869586: botch: Fails ADT tests with python3.6

Control: tag -1 + moreinfo Hi, On Mon, 24 Jul 2017 16:01:58 +0100 Dimitri John Ledkov wrote: > botch fails ADT tests with python3.6. On the surface the output looks sane, > and it's not just the ordering differences as there are new things reported > in the cycle output and