Bug#871269: missing Replaces

2017-08-10 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
On 9 August 2017 at 19:43, Andreas Beckmann wrote: | On 2017-08-09 19:09, Andreas Beckmann wrote: | > I can't find a *gsl*prof* package in the archive, so this indeed seems | > to be a new one. And should be totally unrelated to the splitting of the | > library package. | | That's an interesting

Bug#871269: missing Replaces

2017-08-09 Thread Andreas Beckmann
On 2017-08-09 19:09, Andreas Beckmann wrote: > I can't find a *gsl*prof* package in the archive, so this indeed seems > to be a new one. And should be totally unrelated to the splitting of the > library package. That's an interesting one. Above analysis was without looking at the source. It's in

Bug#871269: missing Replaces

2017-08-09 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
On 9 August 2017 at 19:09, Andreas Beckmann wrote: | On 2017-08-09 18:52, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: | > Uploaded a -6 with the versioned Replaces but just got a note it is in NEW | > because of libgsl-prof -- which seems strange. Any idea? | | Since the packaging is not in git (or another vcs),

Bug#871269: missing Replaces

2017-08-09 Thread Andreas Beckmann
On 2017-08-09 18:52, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: > Uploaded a -6 with the versioned Replaces but just got a note it is in NEW > because of libgsl-prof -- which seems strange. Any idea? Since the packaging is not in git (or another vcs), I can't review the diff ... and NEW is not accessible AFAIK.

Bug#871269: missing Replaces

2017-08-09 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
On 9 August 2017 at 16:55, Andreas Beckmann wrote: | On 2017-08-09 16:49, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: | > | All the Conflicts can probably be turned into Breaks (which will make apt's life | > | easier for distupgrades involving this transition) and Breaks and Replaces | > | need to match w.r.t. to

Bug#871269: missing Replaces

2017-08-09 Thread Andreas Beckmann
On 2017-08-09 16:49, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: > | All the Conflicts can probably be turned into Breaks (which will make apt's > life > | easier for distupgrades involving this transition) and Breaks and Replaces > | need to match w.r.t. to the versioning (otherwise you might run into > | weird

Bug#871269: missing Replaces

2017-08-09 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
Hi Andreas, Thanks for the note. On 9 August 2017 at 15:58, Andreas Beckmann wrote: | Followup-For: Bug #871269 | | Hi Dirk, | | for libgslcblas0 the Replaces on libgsl23 needs to be versioned (<< 2.4+dfsg-4). Oh, right. | All the Conflicts can probably be turned into Breaks (which will

Bug#871269: missing Replaces

2017-08-09 Thread Andreas Beckmann
Followup-For: Bug #871269 Hi Dirk, for libgslcblas0 the Replaces on libgsl23 needs to be versioned (<< 2.4+dfsg-4). All the Conflicts can probably be turned into Breaks (which will make apt's life easier for distupgrades involving this transition) and Breaks and Replaces need to match w.r.t. to

Bug#871269: missing Replaces

2017-08-08 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
(Crap. This sat unsent in Emacs. Anyway -- fixed now, and thanks!) On 7 August 2017 at 10:11, Matthias Klose wrote: | Package: src:gsl | Version: 2.4+dfsg-4 | Severity: serious | Tags: sid buster | | Unpacking libgslcblas0:amd64 (2.4+dfsg-4) ... | dpkg: error processing archive |

Bug#871269: missing Replaces

2017-08-07 Thread Matthias Klose
Package: src:gsl Version: 2.4+dfsg-4 Severity: serious Tags: sid buster Unpacking libgslcblas0:amd64 (2.4+dfsg-4) ... dpkg: error processing archive /tmp/apt-dpkg-install-3HhEhL/10-libgslcblas0_2.4+dfsg-4_amd64.deb (--unpack): trying to overwrite '/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgslcblas.so.0.0.0',