Bug#883218: RFS: elpy/1.20.0-1 [ITP]

2018-05-08 Thread Nicholas D Steeves
Thread continues at Bug#898205: Acknowledgement (Consecutive builds may fail) signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Bug#883218: RFS: elpy/1.20.0-1 [ITP]

2018-05-07 Thread Chris Lamb
Hi Nicholas, > > Anyway, thank you for your kind comments. Do let me know if/when > > you have any updates to the package, particularly one that fixes the > > FTBFS twice-in-a-row. > > This was solved in #896998 "python-pip: missing required _vendor > module. Broken ${python:Depends}?". Hm? I

Bug#883218: RFS: elpy/1.20.0-1 [ITP]

2018-05-07 Thread Nicholas D Steeves
On Fri, May 04, 2018 at 12:24:05AM +0100, Chris Lamb wrote: > Dear Nicholas, > > > the experience I gained while investigating them will make diagnosing > > potential future autopkgtest failures faster > > I trust I'm not hearing any kind of apologetic subtext in your > reply.. If I look think

Bug#883218: RFS: elpy/1.20.0-1 [ITP]

2018-05-03 Thread Chris Lamb
Dear Nicholas, > the experience I gained while investigating them will make diagnosing > potential future autopkgtest failures faster I trust I'm not hearing any kind of apologetic subtext in your reply.. If I look think about anything that I might be vain enough to claim I "know", I usually

Bug#883218: RFS: elpy/1.20.0-1 [ITP]

2018-05-03 Thread Nicholas D Steeves
Hi Chris, Re: FTBS due to self-test failure due to python-pip bug. I arguably could have waited a day, until your container would probably auto-update... Honestly it was a positive experience that you discovered errors during the sponsorship process, because the experience I gained while