Bug#889997: git-buildpackage: gbp create-remote-repo should default to salsa, not git.debian.org

2022-10-18 Thread Akbarkhon Variskhanov
Hi. I just wanted to mention that there is already a command-line utility appropriately called `salsa` from the devscripts package. Perhaps it is worth mentioning it in gbp-create-remote-repo(1)? Or you may even drop it completely, although I don't think you would like to do that. Cheers, Akbar.

Bug#889997: git-buildpackage: gbp create-remote-repo should default to salsa, not git.debian.org

2019-01-18 Thread Michael Prokop
* Daniel Kahn Gillmor [Fri Feb 09, 2018 at 03:52:08PM -0500]: > alioth (which provided git.debian.org) is reaching end of life. > debian developers are encouraged to use salsa.debian.org instead. gbp > create-remote-repo has some defaults which point to alioth, which > should point to salsa

Bug#889997: git-buildpackage: gbp create-remote-repo should default to salsa, not git.debian.org

2018-02-13 Thread Pierre-Elliott Bécue
Le mardi 13 février 2018 à 10:07:52+0100, Guido Günther a écrit : > On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 09:56:28AM +0100, Pierre-Elliott Bécue wrote: > > Le mardi 13 février 2018 à 09:45:43+0100, Guido Günther a écrit : > > > we can leave most of these out since they're not required: > > > > > >

Bug#889997: git-buildpackage: gbp create-remote-repo should default to salsa, not git.debian.org

2018-02-13 Thread Guido Günther
On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 09:56:28AM +0100, Pierre-Elliott Bécue wrote: > Le mardi 13 février 2018 à 09:45:43+0100, Guido Günther a écrit : > > Hi, > > On Mon, Feb 12, 2018 at 06:10:09PM +0100, Pierre-Elliott Bécue wrote: > > > Speaking to the gitlab API is actually quite simple. > > > > > > The

Bug#889997: git-buildpackage: gbp create-remote-repo should default to salsa, not git.debian.org

2018-02-13 Thread Pierre-Elliott Bécue
Le mardi 13 février 2018 à 09:45:43+0100, Guido Günther a écrit : > Hi, > On Mon, Feb 12, 2018 at 06:10:09PM +0100, Pierre-Elliott Bécue wrote: > > Speaking to the gitlab API is actually quite simple. > > > > The user has to create his own private token with API access. Then gbp > > would require

Bug#889997: git-buildpackage: gbp create-remote-repo should default to salsa, not git.debian.org

2018-02-13 Thread Guido Günther
Hi, On Mon, Feb 12, 2018 at 06:10:09PM +0100, Pierre-Elliott Bécue wrote: > Speaking to the gitlab API is actually quite simple. > > The user has to create his own private token with API access. Then gbp > would require a new config parameter to fetch such a token from the > .gitconfig of the

Bug#889997: git-buildpackage: gbp create-remote-repo should default to salsa, not git.debian.org

2018-02-12 Thread Pierre-Elliott Bécue
Speaking to the gitlab API is actually quite simple. The user has to create his own private token with API access. Then gbp would require a new config parameter to fetch such a token from the .gitconfig of the user, or a new option to the create-remote-repo command to provide it. Then, if the

Bug#889997: git-buildpackage: gbp create-remote-repo should default to salsa, not git.debian.org

2018-02-10 Thread Guido Günther
Hi, On Fri, Feb 09, 2018 at 03:52:08PM -0500, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: > Package: git-buildpackage > Version: 0.9.7 > Severity: wishlist > > alioth (which provided git.debian.org) is reaching end of life. > debian developers are encouraged to use salsa.debian.org instead. gbp >

Bug#889997: git-buildpackage: gbp create-remote-repo should default to salsa, not git.debian.org

2018-02-09 Thread Daniel Kahn Gillmor
Package: git-buildpackage Version: 0.9.7 Severity: wishlist alioth (which provided git.debian.org) is reaching end of life. debian developers are encouraged to use salsa.debian.org instead. gbp create-remote-repo has some defaults which point to alioth, which should point to salsa instead.