Hello Chris,
On Sat, Aug 25, 2018 at 08:39:40PM +0100, Chris Lamb wrote:
> > However, I can live with both versions, so if it is too late
> > to fix lintian than so be it.
>
> I wouldn't say it was too late, more that it has not been raised before
> and it would require somewhat of a big
Hi Helge,
> However, I can live with both versions, so if it is too late
> to fix lintian than so be it.
I wouldn't say it was too late, more that it has not been raised before
and it would require somewhat of a big reworking of the logic so would
be difficult to see this being prioritised.
It
Hello Chris,
On Sat, Aug 25, 2018 at 08:18:29PM +0100, Chris Lamb wrote:
> > So either the spec needs clarification (which I doubt) or the lintian
> > check should be relaxed.
>
> I ACK that this might be valid spec-wise. I note, however, that this
> has been in Lintian since early 2013:
>
>
Hi Helge,
> So either the spec needs clarification (which I doubt) or the lintian
> check should be relaxed.
I ACK that this might be valid spec-wise. I note, however, that this
has been in Lintian since early 2013:
Package: lintian
Version: 2.5.97
Severity: normal
This tag wants the wildcard paragraph as first stanza in
debian/copyright. I use(d) to start with the license stanzas, like
Format: https://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/copyright-format/1.0/
Upstream-Name: goobox
Upstream-Contact: Paolo
5 matches
Mail list logo
