Op di 6 nov. 2018 om 15:50 schreef Giovanni Mascellani :
>
> Il 06/11/18 15:23, Olaf van der Spek ha scritto:
> > Just 1.68 contains plenty of improvements:
> > https://www.boost.org/users/history/version_1_68_0.html
>
> Each new version hopefully contains many improvements, but this does not
>
Il 06/11/18 15:23, Olaf van der Spek ha scritto:
> Just 1.68 contains plenty of improvements:
> https://www.boost.org/users/history/version_1_68_0.html
Each new version hopefully contains many improvements, but this does not
make it MUCH better than the one before. Buster will be available for
Op di 6 nov. 2018 om 15:17 schreef Giovanni Mascellani :
> > A beta is scheduled for November 14th, so preparations could start
> > sooner.
>
> This easily means having to do at least part of the work twice. Unless
> there are strong motivations for which 1.69 is MUCH better than 1.67, it
> might
Hi.
Il 05/11/18 10:00, Olaf van der Spek ha scritto:
> What's holding up 1.67?
The usual stuff: other transitions, fixing bugs, testing builds,
maintainers having other things to do with their life. Nothing
specifically, but things can take some time.
> A beta is scheduled for November 14th, so
Op ma 5 nov. 2018 om 09:50 schreef Giovanni Mascellani :
> I don't know, for the moment. First of all, we have to finish
> transitioning to 1.67, which is already proving rather long, and
What's holding up 1.67?
> possibly getting rid of 1.62 (we can in theory ship more than a version
> in the
Hi,
Il 05/11/18 09:28, Olaf van der Spek ha scritto:
> Source: boost1.67
> Severity: wishlist
>
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> What's the plan for Buster? 1.67, 1.68 or 1.69?
> 1.69 would be nice. ;)
I don't know, for the moment. First of all, we have to finish
transitioning to 1.67, which is already
Source: boost1.67
Severity: wishlist
Dear Maintainer,
What's the plan for Buster? 1.67, 1.68 or 1.69?
1.69 would be nice. ;)
Gr,
Olaf
-- System Information:
Debian Release: buster/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
7 matches
Mail list logo