Hi,
gustavo panizzo wrote:
> Alex, any update on this?
I just looked through the open bug reports. The _only_ non-wishlist
bug report open is the one about duplicated bug reports by myself.
So the plural in "long-time bugs non-fixed" is IMHO exaggeration.
So I'm slightly fail to see the reason
Hello
Alex, any update on this?
Is there anything I can help with to move this forward?
--
IRC: gfa
GPG: 0X44BB1BA79F6C6333
On December 8, 2018 9:27:22 AM UTC, gustavo panizzo wrote:
>
>On Sat, Dec 08, 2018 at 04:03:05AM +, Scott Kitterman wrote:
>
>>
>>It seems like it's not for sure this should be removed right now.
>Axel: are you willing to take over as maintainer? I see there is a new
>upstream release.
>>
Control: tag -1 + moreinfo
Hi Scott,
Scott Kitterman wrote:
> It seems like it's not for sure this should be removed right now.
> Axel: are you willing to take over as maintainer?
I'll have a look. In general, the things gustavo wrote, are correct.
> I see there is a new upstream release.
Inde
On Sat, Dec 08, 2018 at 04:03:05AM +, Scott Kitterman wrote:
It seems like it's not for sure this should be removed right now. Axel: are
you willing to take over as maintainer? I see there is a new upstream release.
This is upstream changelog since the last snapshot of the repo I
pac
On Sat, 8 Dec 2018 08:12:54 +0800 gustavo panizzo wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 07, 2018 at 11:06:01AM +0100, Axel Beckert wrote:
> >Hi,
>
> >> leap second [2],
> >
> >Never noticed that despite having uptimed installed on more or less
> >all my Debian systems for more like 15 years or so. You're breaking
On Fri, Dec 07, 2018 at 11:06:01AM +0100, Axel Beckert wrote:
Hi,
leap second [2],
Never noticed that despite having uptimed installed on more or less
all my Debian systems for more like 15 years or so. You're breaking my
tradition!!1!eleventy! ;-)
I understand how you feel, I've used upt
Hi,
thanks for taking me in Cc.
gustavo panizzo wrote:
> I want to request the removal of the uptimed package
*sigh*
> package works on long running servers, but breaks with non-rtc systems
Which are common (Raspberry Pi, Alix, etc.), but far from being the
majority.
> leap second [2],
Never
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
Hello
I want to request the removal of the uptimed package
package works on long running servers, but breaks with non-rtc systems
[1], leap second [2], and general bugginess that hasn't been solved in
years [3]
Some time ago I discovered tuptime which
9 matches
Mail list logo