Bug#916970: FTBFS on arm64 hardware running 32-bit armel userland

2018-12-21 Thread Steve McIntyre
On Fri, Dec 21, 2018 at 08:55:31AM +0100, László Böszörményi (GCS) wrote: >Hi Steve, > >On Thu, Dec 20, 2018 at 10:51 PM Steve McIntyre wrote: >> Source: botan >> Version: 2.6.0-3 >> Severity: important >> User: debian-...@lists.debian.org >> Usertags: cpu-detection >> >> I've been doing a full

Bug#916970: FTBFS on arm64 hardware running 32-bit armel userland

2018-12-20 Thread GCS
Hi Steve, On Thu, Dec 20, 2018 at 10:51 PM Steve McIntyre wrote: > Source: botan > Version: 2.6.0-3 > Severity: important > User: debian-...@lists.debian.org > Usertags: cpu-detection > > I've been doing a full rebuild of the Debian archive, building all > source packages targeting armel and

Bug#916970: FTBFS on arm64 hardware running 32-bit armel userland

2018-12-20 Thread Jack Lloyd
On Thu, Dec 20, 2018 at 09:45:54PM +, Steve McIntyre wrote: > botan could do with fixing upstream (maybe by simply adding "armv8l" > as an alias in src/build-data/arch/arm32.txt?), Exactly this change was made upstream in 2.7.0, due to a similar problem affecting Alpine, which also builds

Bug#916970: FTBFS on arm64 hardware running 32-bit armel userland

2018-12-20 Thread Steve McIntyre
Source: botan Version: 2.6.0-3 Severity: important User: debian-...@lists.debian.org Usertags: cpu-detection Hi! I've been doing a full rebuild of the Debian archive, building all source packages targeting armel and armhf using arm64 hardware. We are planning in future to move all of our 32-bit