tags 918648 + patch
thanks
Dear Thomas:
Please consider doing something like this for buster.
There will be plenty of time after the release of buster to
investigate about this, but in the meantime, the end must be able to
rebuild the package without failures.
Thanks.
--- a/debian/changelog
On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 01:07:00PM +0200, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> Excuse me, but I missed that TZ thing. Is it a bug against the package
> as well?
The timezone issue is tracked in #918712, which was cloned from this one
after we realized the way it failed for me was different than the way
it
On 4/17/19 12:10 AM, Santiago Vila wrote:
> Dear Thomas:
>
> I'm offering two different machines where you can reproduce this hang.
>
> One of them is a START1-S instance from Scaleway. The other is a
> n1-standard-1 instance from Google Compute Engine. The package FTBFS
> in both of them
Dear Thomas:
I'm offering two different machines where you can reproduce this hang.
One of them is a START1-S instance from Scaleway. The other is a
n1-standard-1 instance from Google Compute Engine. The package FTBFS
in both of them because sbuild hangs.
You should have already received access
On Tue, Jan 08, 2019 at 05:54:49PM +0100, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> On 1/8/19 3:20 PM, Adrian Bunk wrote:
>...
> > In any case it would be good if the package would be uploaded source-only,
> > since this would have made it easy to see whether it also fails on the
> > buildds.
>
> Has the issue
On 1/8/19 3:20 PM, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 08, 2019 at 02:38:47PM +0100, Santiago Vila wrote:
>> ...
>> I see you have downgraded this from serious, but Release Policy says
>> packages must build without failure. Could you please tell me
>> in which sense this:
>>
>>
Control: clone -1 -2
Control: retitle -2 watcher FTBFS in some timezones
Control: severity -1 serious
On Tue, Jan 08, 2019 at 03:35:40PM +0100, Santiago Vila wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 08, 2019 at 04:20:18PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 08, 2019 at 02:38:47PM +0100, Santiago Vila wrote:
>
On Tue, Jan 08, 2019 at 04:20:18PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 08, 2019 at 02:38:47PM +0100, Santiago Vila wrote:
> >...
> > I see you have downgraded this from serious, but Release Policy says
> > packages must build without failure. Could you please tell me
> > in which sense this:
>
On Tue, Jan 08, 2019 at 02:38:47PM +0100, Santiago Vila wrote:
>...
> I see you have downgraded this from serious, but Release Policy says
> packages must build without failure. Could you please tell me
> in which sense this:
>
>
> It builds fine for me in my laptop environment (ie: normal sbuild).
Fine. I believe you. Really. But saying "it works for me" does not
help if it fails for everybody else.
> Though one thing: I had to break the run of unit tests into multiple
> runs, otherwise it would hang.
By "I had" you
On 1/8/19 12:12 AM, Santiago Vila wrote:
> severity 918648 serious
> retitle 918648 watcher: FTBFS (autobuilder hangs)
> thanks
>
> Hi.
>
> Unfortunately, my autobuilders still hang when I disable eatmydata,
> and they do it all the time (100% reproducible). Retitling accordingly.
>
> Note that
severity 918648 serious
retitle 918648 watcher: FTBFS (autobuilder hangs)
thanks
Hi.
Unfortunately, my autobuilders still hang when I disable eatmydata,
and they do it all the time (100% reproducible). Retitling accordingly.
Note that this hangs for me and it "just" FTBFS in
Package: src:watcher
Version: 1.12.0-1
Tags: ftbfs
Hello Thomas.
I tried to build this package in sid but it failed:
[...]
debian/rules build-indep
pyversions: missing X(S)-Python-Version in control file, fall
13 matches
Mail list logo
