On Tue 2019-02-12 09:10:57 +0100, Ansgar wrote:
> Maybe a separate implementation (like opentmpfiles for tmpfiles) would
> be a better approach?
Yep, i see your point. I've now filed https://bugs.debian.org/922353 --
an ITP of a simple python3 implementation of the sd_listen_fds(3)
convention tha
Daniel Kahn Gillmor writes:
> If those non-systemd systems had a simple-to-install socket activation
> wrapper, then we could convince the daemons to drop their
> non-socket-activated codepaths, and encourage them to launch their
> daemons something like this:
I think that would be nice in princip
Package: src:systemd
Version: 240-5
Severity: wishlist
More daemons are beginning to offer systemd-style socket activation,
which is a very nice feature for security and isolation.
However, those daemons are difficult to run on non-systemd systems, so
most upstream daemon authors continue to ship
3 matches
Mail list logo
