Package: reprotest
Severity: wishlist
The README.md file from the source package is very helpful for
understanding how to interact with reprotest, please include it in the
reprotest binary package.
--
bye,
pabs
https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally
Hello,
I attach a short .c example to demonstrate the actual problem,
and I correct my message.
It is the sum history_base + history_length which causes me grief.
The behaviour of where_history() is unexpected to me, but I'm not
sure whether its usage in ngspice is correct.
Hi,
Am 12.08.2016 um 19:55 schrieb Santiago Vila:
> Still FTBFS:
>
> https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rbuild/unstable/amd64/ceres-solver_1.11.0~dfsg0-5.rbuild.log
this appears to be a different bug due to a new eigen3 release and not
related to the bug you reopened.
Regards,
--
found 806042 2.0.11+1-11
thanks
This still happens in this version:
-
make[5]: Leaving directory '/<>/guile-2.0-2.0.11+1'
make[4]: Leaving directory '/<>/guile-2.0-2.0.11+1'
make[3]: Leaving directory '/<>/guile-2.0-2.0.11+1'
make[2]:
Hello Simon, Felipe,
Felipe Sateler [2016-08-12 11:16 -0300]:
> Thanks for the patch.This makes a lot of sense, especially because
> ENOENT is tolerated everywhere in that file.
Indeed, thanks! I added a test case for this which reproduced the
failure and confirms the fix:
Actually I find this problem even more serious then that because it does this
even though I have Skype installed.
For pidgin not to crash I have to run Skype and login first, otherwsie this
happens:1. Pidgin runs Skype.2. Wait for a bit (whether logging in to Skype or
not)3. Pidgin crashes.4.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hello Andreas,
Thanks for the bug report.
On Thu, 2016-08-11 at 15:55 +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> during a test with piuparts I noticed your package failed to purge due
> to a command not found. According to policy 7.2 you cannot rely on the
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "ChangZhuo Chen (陳昌倬)"
* Package name: zplug
Version : 2.1.0
Upstream Author : Masaki Ishiyama
* URL : https://zplug.sh/
* License : Expat
Programming Lang: zsh
Description : next-generation
Dear Maintainer,
> Source: sendfile
> Version: 2.1b.20080616-4.1
> Tags: patch
There hasn't seem to be any update on this bug in 557 days, in which
time the Reproducible Builds effort has come on a long way. :)
Would you consider applying this patch and uploading?
Regards,
--
,''`.
Dear Maintainer,
> Source: ucspi-tcp
> Version: 1:0.88-3
> Tags: patch
There hasn't seem to be any update on this bug in 557 days, in which
time the Reproducible Builds effort has come on a long way. :)
Would you consider applying this patch and uploading?
Regards,
--
,''`.
: :'
Dear Maintainer,
> Source: cvs-mailcommit
> Version: 1.19-2
> Tags: patch
There hasn't seem to be any update on this bug in 557 days, in which
time the Reproducible Builds effort has come on a long way. :)
Would you consider applying this patch and uploading?
Regards,
--
,''`.
:
Source: lv2-c++-tools
Version: 1.0.5-2
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build from source
User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Dear Maintainer,
lv2-c++-tools fails to build from source in
Dear Maintainer,
> Source: p0f
> Version: 2.0.8-2
> Tags: patch
There hasn't seem to be any update on this bug in 555 days, in which
time the Reproducible Builds effort has come on a long way. :)
Would you consider applying this patch and uploading?
Regards,
--
,''`.
: :' :
Dear Maintainer,
> Source: erc
> Version: 5.3-1ubuntu2
> Tags: patch
There hasn't seem to be any update on this bug in 557 days, in which
time the Reproducible Builds effort has come on a long way. :)
Would you consider applying this patch and uploading?
Regards,
--
,''`.
: :' :
Dear Maintainer,
> Source: libtnt
> Version: 1.2.6-1
> Tags: patch
There hasn't seem to be any update on this bug in 553 days, in which
time the Reproducible Builds effort has come on a long way. :)
Would you consider applying this patch and uploading?
Regards,
--
,''`.
: :' :
Dear Maintainer,
> Source: prima
> Version: 1.28-1.3build1
> Tags: patch
There hasn't seem to be any update on this bug in 539 days, in which
time the Reproducible Builds effort has come on a long way. :)
Would you consider applying this patch and uploading?
Regards,
--
,''`.
:
Control: clone -1 -2 -3
Control: retitle -1 psql ident without existing sys-user unclear error
Control: tags -1 -moreinfo
Control: retitle -2 psql incorrectly falls back to TCP in ident case
Control: tags -1 -moreinfo
Control: retitle -3 psql alters credentials with dbuser iso dbadmin
Hi
severity 834220 minor
thanks
Hi,
On Sat, Aug 13, 2016 at 02:34:32PM +0200, Thomas Hackert wrote:
> > On Sat, Aug 13, 2016 at 12:19:44PM +0200, Thomas Hackert wrote:
> > > while trying to get a backtrace for a crash with an installed
> > > extension, I started LO from command line with "soffice
>
Package: nis
Version: 3.17-35
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Hi,
since 3.17-35 I can't bind to my nisserver anymore. Downgrading to
3.17-34 succeeded. Please notice:
3.17-35:
# ldd $(which ypbind)
linux-vdso.so.1 (0x7ffdb879f000)
libpthread.so.0 =>
On Sat, Aug 13, 2016 at 02:47:22PM +0200, Thomas Hackert wrote:
> it is only 4k in size and empty, but I will attach it to this mail.
If it's empty, well you don't need a empty file.. But most probably
reportbug-ng failed again. What a surprise. NOT. Maybe you should use reportbug
again?
common
control: tags -1 + pending
Hi Peter,
On Sun, Aug 14, 2016 at 11:12:00AM +0200, Peter Körner wrote:
> As the author of voctomix I'd like to report, that the Dependencies
> between voctomix and voctomix-core are a little bit mixed up.
>
> As far as I can see, the voctomix-Package contains the
Package: ruby-fog,ruby-fog-rackspace
Version: ruby-fog/1.37.0-1
Version: ruby-fog-rackspace/0.1.1-1
Severity: serious
User: trei...@debian.org
Usertags: edos-file-overwrite
Date: 2016-08-14
Architecture: amd64
Distribution: sid
Hi,
automatic installation tests of packages that share a file and
On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 01:20:47PM +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> An additional point from Petter Reinholdtsen:
>
> 09:39 < pere> bwh: note, the insserv and startpar packages are part of the
> sysvinit group of packages, and should probably be handled by
> the
> same
Hi,
[11:27] < pabs> 09:18:15> should we close #786755 in devscripts with a
Suggests: reprotest?
[11:27] < zwiebelbot> 09:18:19> Debian#786755: devscripts: please include a
reproducible builds script - https://bugs.debian.org/786755
[11:27] < pabs> 09:18:22> ceridwen: ^
[11:27] < pabs> 09:19:38>
Control: tags -1 confirmed
On 13-08-16 23:36, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote:
> Severity: wishlist
Ack. I have considered this since Debconf 15 but decided it was not on
the top of my list.
> As of now it seems, on cannot configure the socket dir and "port" that is
> used by dbconfig, when UNIX
Package: libreoffice
Version: 1:5.1.5~rc2-1
Followup-For: Bug #834220
Hello Rene, *,
I have tried to reproduce this bug in a clean environment (I hope
you count a Debian installation in VirtualBox as "Clean" ... ;) ):
1. Downloaded
On Sun, Aug 14, 2016 at 12:14:55PM +0200, Maximiliano Curia wrote:
> I've uploaded new version of akonadi that will be compiled against g++-6,
> and this issue will be solved when akonadi migrates to stretch.
Please consider also an upload of kmailtransport having a versioned
Build-Depends:
Hello,
finally got some time to move this forward.
I have packaged dependencies for vdirsyncer and vdirsyncer itself is
waiting for review and upload [1].
I also completely rework Khal packaging, waiting for review as well [2].
So I am expecting Khal will reach Debian unstable soon :-)
---
[1]
Source: pd-flite
Version: 0.02.3-1
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch upstream
User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: timestamps username
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi!
While working on the "reproducible builds" effort [1], we have noticed
that
Hello Chris,
Il giorno dom, 14/08/2016 alle 10.30 +0100, Chris Lamb ha scritto:
> Dear Maintainer,
> > Source: hylafax
> > Version: 3:6.0.6-6
> > Tags: patch
>
> There hasn't seem to be any update on this bug in 412 days, in which
> time the Reproducible Builds effort has come on a long way. :)
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
Following the advice in
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=811377#10
I request an adopter for the startpar package, which should be taken
over along with sysvinit and insserv.
The package description is:
Used by the sysv-rc boot system executor to
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
Following the advice in
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=811377#10
I request an adopter for the insserv package, which should be taken
over along with sysvinit and startpar.
The package description is:
The insserv program is used by the standard
Hi Sean,
Quoting Sean Whitton (2016-08-13 23:30:54)
> Changes since the last upload:
>
> * QA upload.
> * Drop "Conflicts:/Provides:/Replaces: pdfrw" lines (Closes: #814289).
> The pdfrw binary package is long gone and was never part of a release.
> This fixes co-installing
Hi James,
Quoting James Valleroy (2016-08-14 00:34:27)
> On Sat, 13 Aug 2016 19:26:51 +0200 Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>> Quoting James Valleroy (2016-08-13 18:36:02)
>>> The attached patch will add FreedomBox to the blends tasks list,
>>> shown in Debian installer.
>>>
>>> Note one
On Wed, 23 Jul 2014 14:53:13 -0700 Kristian Erik Hermansen
wrote:
> # x11vnc -safer -listen 127.0.0.1 -no6 -bg -display :0 2>&1 | egrep -i 'tcp6'
> 23/07/2014 14:48:42 Autoprobing TCP6 port
> 23/07/2014 14:48:42 Autoprobing selected TCP6 port 5900
I've found that
Source: caja-extensions
Version: 1.14.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build from source
User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Dear Maintainer,
caja-extensions fails to build from source in
Source: ccbuild
Version: 2.0.7-2
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build from source
User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Dear Maintainer,
ccbuild fails to build from source in unstable/amd64:
[..]
tags 777182 + pending
thanks
Hi Sam,
> It's a fairly static package, and I don't think reproducible builds adds
> enough value to this package to justify an upload just for this patch.
[..]
> I will include it in the next upload.
I would agree; best to be somewhat conservative for packages such
fixed 811987 1.11.0~dfsg0-4
thanks
On Sun, 14 Aug 2016, Philipp Huebner wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Am 12.08.2016 um 19:55 schrieb Santiago Vila:
> > Still FTBFS:
> >
> > https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rbuild/unstable/amd64/ceres-solver_1.11.0~dfsg0-5.rbuild.log
>
> this appears to be a
Hi,
> > Would you consider applying this patch and uploading?
> I'd really appreciate it if you could NMU it Chris.
I would, but I can't seem to find a solution to #808634 right this
second.. If you could follow up to that, then I would be happy to.
Regards,
--
,''`.
: :' :
> fatal error: sigc++/object.h: No such file or directory
Some more info:
$ pkg-config modglue --cflags
-I/usr/include/sigc++-2.0 -I/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/sigc++-2.0/include
sigc++/object.h is not in libsigc++-2.0-dev but it is in libsigc++-1.2-dev.
Regards,
--
,''`.
: :' :
Package: reprotest
Version: 0.2
Severity: minor
Usertags: embed
The reprotest binary package includes copies of the autopkgtest-*
manual pages under its own directory that is outside the normal paths
for manual pages. The code for reprotest doesn't appear to use them.
$ dpkg -L reprotest | grep
On Sun, Aug 14, 2016 at 12:37:56PM +0200, Peter Körner wrote:
> > btw, looking at the recent commits I've seen that configuration files in
> > /etc/voctomix are now also being considered, which is a feature I think
> > would
> > be worth a 0.3.2 release alone!
> That's nothing new and already
I don't this bug should have been closed just yet. The original reporter
obviously had a
difficult time figuring out where the problem lay, and no doubt countless
others will too.
At the very least a message needs to go out in apt-get upgrade telling people
that they
should and cite that
On Sun, Aug 14, 2016 at 05:27:39PM +1000, Brendan O'Dea wrote:
> This is a bit puzzling, but I am guessing that the bug is in apt:
> getDpkgStatusLocation is modifying the global _config object of libapt-pkg in
> such a way that if debSystem::Initialize is called twice, the results will be
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hello,
On Fri, 2016-08-05 at 16:13 +0300, Panos Gotsis wrote:
> We have our nodes installed with the latest patched jessie. The OS version
> comes with
> multipath-tools-0.5.0-6+deb8u2. The system uses iscsi to connect to a SAN
> storage (Netapp).
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "dblatex"
Package name: dblatex
Version : 0.3.8-1
Upstream Author : Benoît Guillon
URL : http://dblatex.sourceforge.net/
License
On Sun, 14 Aug 2016, David Bremner wrote:
> Attached please find a debdiff that fixes the problem in unstable. I'm
> fairly certain it's the same problem (same spurious output) as in
> testing. I'm not sure when I'll be able to upload this, so if someone
> wants to NMU/sponsor it, feel free.
Package: lintian
Version: 2.5.46
Severity: wishlist
Now that Lintian no longer warns about dependencies on packages with
lower priorities, I think it would make sense for Lintian to warn about
library packages with excessively high priorities. In general, a
library package should only get pulled
¡Hola Santiago!
El 2016-08-14 a las 02:24 +0200, Santiago Vila escribió:
Package: src:kmailtransport
Version: 16.04.2-2
Severity: serious
This package currently fails to build from source in stretch:
--
cd
Followup-For: Bug #827517
Package: xul-ext-ublock-origin
Version: 1.8.4+dfsg-1
Dear Maintainer,
This bug is still present in the current versions of ublock-origin and
firefox-esr.
Reading the previous messages I understand that the bug has been fixed
starting from firefox 48 but there is no
On Sun, Aug 14, 2016 at 12:36:03AM +0200, gregor herrmann wrote:
>use AptPkg::Config '$_config';
>use AptPkg::System '$_system';
>use AptPkg::Version;
>use AptPkg::Cache ;
>
>$_config->init;
>$_system = $_config->system;
>my $vs = $_system->versioning;
>my $apt_cache = AptPkg::Cache->new ;
This
Package: teeworlds
Version: 0.6.2+dfsg-2
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
when trying to connect to a 0.6.3 server with the teeworld client provided in
debian testing, it shows :
'Wrong version. Server is running '0.6 626fce9a778df4d4' and client '0.6
e42d81cd67b8c7bc''
debian stable
Package: lintian
Version: 2.5.46
Followup-For: Bug #805076
Dear Maintainer,
there have been quite some releases since I opened this. Is there anything I
can improve to get this included?
Cheers Jochen
-- System Information:
Debian Release: stretch/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500,
Jochen Sprickerhof:
> Package: lintian
> Version: 2.5.46
> Followup-For: Bug #805076
>
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> there have been quite some releases since I opened this. Is there anything I
> can improve to get this included?
>
> Cheers Jochen
> [...]
Hi,
Apologies for missing this.
It would be
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
Hi,
kde-sc-dev-latest and kdenetwork are metapackages, so please update the
overrides accordingly.
Thanks,
--
Pino
Le 13/08/2016 à 19:35, larice a écrit :
> Package: libedit2
> Version: jessie + stretch
> Severity: normal
> Tags: upstream
>
> Dear Maintainer,
>
>* What led up to the situation?
> Using debian package ngspice.
>
> * What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or ineffective)?
>
I'd really appreciate it if you could NMU it Chris.
Cheers,
Iulian
On Sun, Aug 14, 2016 at 01:58:36AM +0100, Chris Lamb wrote:
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> > Source: cadabra
> > Version: 1.29-1
> > Tags: patch
>
> There hasn't seem to be any update on this bug in 348 days, in which
> time the
Package: voctomix-core
Version: 0.3.1-1.1
As the author of voctomix I'd like to report, that the Dependencies
between voctomix and voctomix-core are a little bit mixed up.
As far as I can see, the voctomix-Package contains the example scripts.
The following dependencies/suggest, that are
On Sun, Aug 14, 2016 at 06:15:25PM +1000, Craig Sanders wrote:
> Tyler Fenby wrote:
> > I can confirm that the ZFS backend works as expected on Debian after
> > recompiling libvirt with only a couple lines added to debian/rules to
> > enable the configure flag.
>
> thanks
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hi
On 13-08-16 23:31, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote:
> When having UNIX sockets in dbconfig-common, it still uses the term "ident" as
> the auth mode.
Could you be a bit more verbose what you find this? The debconf
questions should be correct nowadays.
> But it
Dear Maintainer,
> Source: mimefilter
> Version: 1.7
> Tags: patch
There hasn't seem to be any update on this bug in 552 days, in which
time the Reproducible Builds effort has come on a long way. :)
Would you consider applying this patch and uploading?
Regards,
--
,''`.
: :' :
Dear Maintainer,
> Source: xotcl
> Version: 1.6.8-1
> Tags: patch
There hasn't seem to be any update on this bug in 348 days, in which
time the Reproducible Builds effort has come on a long way. :)
Would you consider applying this patch and uploading?
Regards,
--
,''`.
: :' :
Hello Markus,
On 2016/08/12 21:59, Markus Unterwaditzer wrote:
>
> I see that you have added a few patches to your Debian package.
>
> > 0001-Do-not-require-setuptools-scm.patch
>
> I couldn't find how you're getting the sourcecode, but this should not be
> necessary if you're using the
reopen 834245
stop
Sorry my mistake, reopening.
Tyler Fenby wrote:
> I can confirm that the ZFS backend works as expected on Debian after
> recompiling libvirt with only a couple lines added to debian/rules to
> enable the configure flag.
thanks for looking into this.
I cloned libvirt from
Dear Maintainer,
> Source: socklog
> Version: 2.1.0-8
> Tags: patch
There hasn't seem to be any update on this bug in 553 days, in which
time the Reproducible Builds effort has come on a long way. :)
Would you consider applying this patch and uploading?
Regards,
--
,''`.
: :' :
Dear Maintainer,
> Source: tkrat
> Version: 1:2.2cvs20100105-true-dfsg-6ubuntu1
> Tags: patch
There hasn't seem to be any update on this bug in 546 days, in which
time the Reproducible Builds effort has come on a long way. :)
Would you consider applying this patch and uploading?
Regards,
--
Dear Maintainer,
> Source: beav
> Version: 1:1.40-18build1
> Tags: patch
There hasn't seem to be any update on this bug in 553 days, in which
time the Reproducible Builds effort has come on a long way. :)
Would you consider applying this patch and uploading?
Regards,
--
,''`.
:
Source: gr-radar
Version: 0.0.0.20160126-1
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build from source
User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Dear Maintainer,
gr-radar fails to build from source in
Dear Maintainer,
> Source: ftpcopy
> Version: 0.6.7-2
> Tags: patch
There hasn't seem to be any update on this bug in 553 days, in which
time the Reproducible Builds effort has come on a long way. :)
Would you consider applying this patch and uploading?
Regards,
--
,''`.
: :' :
Dear Maintainer,
> Source: udev-discover
> Version: 0.2.2-1
> Tags: patch
There hasn't seem to be any update on this bug in 537 days, in which
time the Reproducible Builds effort has come on a long way. :)
Would you consider applying this patch and uploading?
Regards,
--
,''`.
:
Dear Maintainer,
> Source: hylafax
> Version: 3:6.0.6-6
> Tags: patch
There hasn't seem to be any update on this bug in 412 days, in which
time the Reproducible Builds effort has come on a long way. :)
Would you consider applying this patch and uploading?
Regards,
--
,''`.
: :'
Dear Maintainer,
> Source: madlib
> Version: 1.3.0-2.1
> Tags: patch
There hasn't seem to be any update on this bug in 539 days, in which
time the Reproducible Builds effort has come on a long way. :)
Would you consider applying this patch and uploading?
Regards,
--
,''`.
: :' :
Dear Maintainer,
> Source: biff
> Version: 1:0.17.pre2412-5
> Tags: patch
There hasn't seem to be any update on this bug in 553 days, in which
time the Reproducible Builds effort has come on a long way. :)
Would you consider applying this patch and uploading?
Regards,
--
,''`.
Dear Maintainer,
> Source: gnarwl
> Version: 3.6.dfsg-6.2ubuntu1
> Tags: patch
There hasn't seem to be any update on this bug in 536 days, in which
time the Reproducible Builds effort has come on a long way. :)
Would you consider applying this patch and uploading?
Regards,
--
,''`.
Dear Maintainer,
> Source: khmerconverter
> Version: 1.4-1
> Tags: patch
There hasn't seem to be any update on this bug in 536 days, in which
time the Reproducible Builds effort has come on a long way. :)
Would you consider applying this patch and uploading?
Regards,
--
,''`.
:
Dear Maintainer,
> Source: uclibc
> Version: 0.9.32-1
> Tags: patch
There hasn't seem to be any update on this bug in 548 days, in which
time the Reproducible Builds effort has come on a long way. :)
Would you consider applying this patch and uploading?
Regards,
--
,''`.
: :' :
Dear Maintainer,
> Source: yocto-reader
> Version: 0.9.4
> Tags: patch
There hasn't seem to be any update on this bug in 553 days, in which
time the Reproducible Builds effort has come on a long way. :)
Would you consider applying this patch and uploading?
Regards,
--
,''`.
: :'
Dear Maintainer,
> Source: sgabios
> Version: 0.0~svn8-3
> Tags: patch
There hasn't seem to be any update on this bug in 536 days, in which
time the Reproducible Builds effort has come on a long way. :)
Would you consider applying this patch and uploading?
Regards,
--
,''`.
: :'
Dear Maintainer,
> Source: ssmtp
> Version: 2.64-8
> Tags: patch
There hasn't seem to be any update on this bug in 553 days, in which
time the Reproducible Builds effort has come on a long way. :)
Would you consider applying this patch and uploading?
Regards,
--
,''`.
: :' :
Dear Maintainer,
> Source: vmm
> Version: 0.6.2-1
> Tags: patch
There hasn't seem to be any update on this bug in 553 days, in which
time the Reproducible Builds effort has come on a long way. :)
Would you consider applying this patch and uploading?
Regards,
--
,''`.
: :' :
#Dear Maintainer,
> Source: uucpsend
> Version: 1.1-4
> Tags: patch
There hasn't seem to be any update on this bug in 557 days, in which
time the Reproducible Builds effort has come on a long way. :)
Would you consider applying this patch and uploading?
Regards,
--
,''`.
: :' :
Dear Maintainer,
> Source: ipsvd
> Version: 1.0.0-3
> Tags: patch
There hasn't seem to be any update on this bug in 553 days, in which
time the Reproducible Builds effort has come on a long way. :)
Would you consider applying this patch and uploading?
Regards,
--
,''`.
: :' :
Dear Maintainer,
> Source: daemontools
> Version: 1:0.76-6ubuntu1
> Tags: patch
There hasn't seem to be any update on this bug in 558 days, in which
time the Reproducible Builds effort has come on a long way. :)
Would you consider applying this patch and uploading?
Regards,
--
,''`.
Dear Maintainer,
> Source: aewm++-goodies
> Version: 1.0-9
> Tags: patch
There hasn't seem to be any update on this bug in 553 days, in which
time the Reproducible Builds effort has come on a long way. :)
Would you consider applying this patch and uploading?
Regards,
--
,''`.
:
Package: src:lv2-c++-tools
Version: 1.0.5-2
Severity: serious
Dear maintainer:
This package currently fails to build from source in stretch:
--
g++ programs/lv2peg/lv2peg.o -Llibraries/paq/ -lpaq
Dear Maintainer,
> Source: pixmap
> Version: 2.6pl4-18ubuntu1
> Tags: patch
There hasn't seem to be any update on this bug in 553 days, in which
time the Reproducible Builds effort has come on a long way. :)
Would you consider applying this patch and uploading?
Regards,
--
,''`.
Dear Maintainer,
> Source: fake
> Version: 1.1.11-1
> Tags: patch
There hasn't seem to be any update on this bug in 557 days, in which
time the Reproducible Builds effort has come on a long way. :)
Would you consider applying this patch and uploading?
Regards,
--
,''`.
: :' :
Dear Maintainer,
> Source: gpsmanshp
> Version: 1.2-5
> Tags: patch
There hasn't seem to be any update on this bug in 552 days, in which
time the Reproducible Builds effort has come on a long way. :)
Would you consider applying this patch and uploading?
Regards,
--
,''`.
: :' :
Dear Maintainer,
> Source: dh-kpatches
> Version: 0.99.36+nmu2
> Tags: patch
There hasn't seem to be any update on this bug in 557 days, in which
time the Reproducible Builds effort has come on a long way. :)
Would you consider applying this patch and uploading?
Regards,
--
,''`.
Dear Maintainer,
> Source: debian-builder
> Version: 1.8
> Tags: patch
There hasn't seem to be any update on this bug in 557 days, in which
time the Reproducible Builds effort has come on a long way. :)
Would you consider applying this patch and uploading?
Regards,
--
,''`.
: :'
Dear Maintainer,
> Source: leave
> Version: 1.12-2
> Tags: patch
There hasn't seem to be any update on this bug in 553 days, in which
time the Reproducible Builds effort has come on a long way. :)
Would you consider applying this patch and uploading?
Regards,
--
,''`.
: :' :
Dear Maintainer,
> Source: ccze
> Version: 0.2.1-2ubuntu1
> Tags: patch
There hasn't seem to be any update on this bug in 553 days, in which
time the Reproducible Builds effort has come on a long way. :)
Would you consider applying this patch and uploading?
Regards,
--
,''`.
: :'
Dear Maintainer,
> Source: ccze
> Version: 0.2.1-2ubuntu1
> Tags: patch
There hasn't seem to be any update on this bug in 553 days, in which
time the Reproducible Builds effort has come on a long way. :)
Would you consider applying this patch and uploading?
Regards,
--
,''`.
: :'
Hi Holger,
On 14.08.2016 12:28, Holger Levsen wrote:
> btw, looking at the recent commits I've seen that configuration files in
> /etc/voctomix are now also being considered, which is a feature I think would
> be worth a 0.3.2 release alone!
That's nothing new and already since 0.1 like this:
Hello Rene, *,
On Sun, Aug 14, 2016 at 12:01:15PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 13, 2016 at 02:34:32PM +0200, Thomas Hackert wrote:
> > > On Sat, Aug 13, 2016 at 12:19:44PM +0200, Thomas Hackert wrote:
> > > > while trying to get a backtrace for a crash with an installed
> > > >
On Thu, 11 Aug 2016 19:50:09 +, Chris Knadle wrote:
> > But I also started looking at deb-systemd-helper (in
> > init-system-helpers) and found an interesting example:
> >
> > https://sources.debian.net/src/isatapd/0.9.7-2/debian/postinst/?hl=12#L12
> >
> > Maybe this is the way to go?
> >
Dear TC,
I have now found enough brain-time to re-read this bug-log. It's a very
enlightening and interesting read, I must say.
Now onto moving forward; thanks go to Marga for, as Sam put it, "getting the
level of specificity that we need now". I agree that we have enough data to
decide at
Hey there, can you verify if this patch is still needed or the
underlying issue has been addressed in sphinx?
On Sat, Jun 27, 2015 at 8:21 PM, W. Martin Borgert wrote:
> On 2015-06-27 13:40, Sandro Tosi wrote:
>> Also, why dont you just patch sphinx instead of changing all
1 - 100 of 376 matches
Mail list logo