Hi Maximiliano,
please take a look at the last strace output of baloo_file to see, which files
get opened by baloo:
strace -e trace=open baloo_file_extractor
open("/usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/qt5/plugins/kf5/kfilemetadata/
kfilemetadata_taglibextractor.so", O_RDONLY|O_CLOEXEC) = 7
Package: spykeviewer
Version: 0.4.4-1
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
I prepared the new qtconsole and spyder package which are available in
experimental
When I try to start spydeviewer with these new versions, I get this
$ spykeviewer
/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/IPython/qt.py:13:
Hi Marcelo,
On Fri, 26 Aug 2016 10:30:51 -0400 "marcelomen...@gmail.com"
wrote:
> 2016-08-25 13:25 GMT-04:00 Andreas Metzler :
> > On 2016-08-24 "marcelomen...@gmail.com"
> > wrote:
> >> Package: libgnutls30
> >> Version:
control: owner -1 !
control: tags -1 moreinfo
(ccing people who expressed interest in this update)
> I am looking for a sponsor for the package "backbone"
here we are, but I have some questions/issues:
1) why did you drop so much build-dependencies?
2) missing copyrights/licenses:
*
On 08/28/2016 08:37 AM, Bart Schouten wrote:
> Sam Hartman schreef op 28-08-2016 1:37:
>> Similarly, if the community of people who care about sysvinit is
>> unwilling to spend the time keeping it working, eventually sysvinit
>> as a whole will be unmaintained and buggy.
>
> True, but I don't
Package: libip4tc-dev
Version: 1.6.0-3
Tags: patch
User: ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com
Usertags: origin-ubuntu ubuntu-patch yakkety
Hello,
the new libip[46]tc-dev do not depend on their corresponding library
packages libip[46]tc0. They only depend on libiptc0, which in Debian
depends on
Hello Adam Borowski.
On Sat, Aug 27, 2016 at 09:56:30PM +0200, Adam Borowski wrote:
> Package: util-linux
> Version: 2.28.1-1
> Severity: wishlist
>
>
> Hi!
> Please advise where to put the attached program. It fixes the problem when
> you connect to a serial console and your terminal size is
Package: htop
Version: 2.0.2-1
Severity: normal
--- Please enter the report below this line. ---
Starting from version 2 of htop, scroll using the mouse wheel should work:
I Quote /usr/share/doc/htop/changelog.gz
-(Cut)-
What's new in version 2.0.0
.
* Support for NCurses 6 ABI,
Christian Seiler schreef op 28-08-2016 10:07:
... warehouse of troubles that need a million hours of employment
each year to keep it going ...
- you will hate the day when you discover you've been scammed ...
Or, when other people constantly and irrationally bring up
libsystemd0 again and
Followup-For: Bug #835185
Package: mysql-workbench
Version: 6.3.4+dfsg-3+b5
Control: severity -1 serious
Control: usertags -1 + bittenby crash
On Tue, 23 Aug 2016 07:41:42 -0400 Richard Ayotte wrote:
> The application segfaults when a connection is clicked to be opened.
I have the same issue,
Gianfranco: Let me know if I should backport the openssl changes into
the 7.4 upstream branch.
Regards
Christian
Control: retitle -1 dcut: use existing defaults for GnuPG key
Control: severity -1 wishlist
On 27-Oct-2011, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
> dcut does not pick the correct gpg key.
As you point out, ‘dcut’ has an explicit command-line option to
specify the desired key ID. So I'm demoting this report
Package: src:d-shlibs
Version: 0.75
Severity: serious
Dear maintainer:
I tried to build this package in stretch with "dpkg-buildpackage -A"
(which is what the "Arch: all" autobuilder would do to build it)
but it failed:
control: forcemerge -1 835550
control: fixed -1 7.6.33+dfsg-1exp2
Hi Christian,
>Gianfranco: Let me know if I should backport the openssl changes into
>the 7.4 upstream branch.
not really needed, that branch is dead in Debian :)
(and the new openssl won't reach stable)
so, since experimental
Package: src:pdal
Version: 1.2.0-4
Severity: serious
Dear maintainer:
I tried to build this package in stretch with "dpkg-buildpackage -A"
(which is what the "Arch: all" autobuilder would do to build it)
but it failed:
Peter Keel, on Sat 27 Aug 2016 11:32:34 +0200, wrote:
> And they all crash with the same error:
> # SIGSEGV (0xb) at pc=0x7f129a520043, pid=27365, tid=0x7f12886b2700
> #
> # JRE version: OpenJDK Runtime Environment (8.0_102-b14) (build
> 1.8.0_102-8u102-b14.1-2-b14)
> # Java VM: OpenJDK
Package: src:wxsqlite3
Version: 3.4.0~dfsg1-1
Severity: serious
Dear maintainer:
I tried to build this package in stretch with "dpkg-buildpackage -A"
(which is what the "Arch: all" autobuilder would do to build it)
but it failed:
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-scie...@lists.debian.org
Note:
Please make this upload deferred, since some dependencies
are still in the queue.
Clarification on the source name:
This package is not named "meta-torch-core" because some
of torch core
Control tags 835649 moreinfo
On Sat, Aug 27, 2016 at 11:41:02PM +0100, Stephen Lyons wrote:
> I believe the version of this package for Debian 7 installations
> ("OldStable") is *critically* out of date and still has the CVEs that
> have been addressed by later versions 1:3.6.1 in "Stable" or
Seems to work just fine here on wheezy:
| # cat /etc/debian_version
| 7.11
| # update-flashplugin-nonfree --status
| Flash Player version installed on this system : 11.2.202.632
| Flash Player version available on upstream site: 11.2.202.632
| flash-mozilla.so - auto mode
|
Three years and two months later...
I am still doing hacky crap to get bcache installed on new systems.
package: prometheus
version: 1.0.1+ds-1
severity: serious
libjs-handlebars is missing source (see
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=830986 and
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=830978). I'm planning
to drop this package (other option is to keep in non-free) soon.
]] Bart Schouten
> > I agree on this too. To the extent it should be considered
> > time-limited, it should be «until N releases after sysvinit is
> > removed» or somesuch, if that happens.
>
> In legal terms, in law, it would be considered that the burden of
> proof lies with those who want
Sam Hartman schreef op 28-08-2016 1:37:
I'm nervous of going too far down the path of legalisms.
Asking those who need the scripts to prove (or even say) they still
need
them is not what we want.
However if someone is having difficulty maintaining the scripts or they
are broken, it is
Package: libreoffice
Version: 1:5.2.0-2
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
* What led up to the situation?
When I try to scroll or do a word search on a sizeable document of say 50 or
more pages, lines of text do not appear making the proper editing of the
document practically impossible.
Control: tags 817231 + patch
Control: tags 817231 + pending
Dear Maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for rabbitvcs (versioned as 0.16-1.1) fixing this
bug #817231 and have uploaded it to Debian Mentors:
https://mentors.debian.net/package/rabbitvcs
Regards.
Christopher Hoskin
diff -Nru
tag 835662 + moreinfo
thanks
Hi,
On Sun, Aug 28, 2016 at 04:43:02PM +1000, Vince Barwinski wrote:
> When I try to scroll or do a word search on a sizeable document of say 50 or
> more pages, lines of text do not appear making the proper editing of the
> document practically impossible. In
tags 834648 +pending
thanks
Hello Chris,
On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 09:24:32PM +0100, Chris Lamb wrote:
> I believe there is a typo in your debian/rules (override_dh_autoclean
> -> override_dh_auto_clean).
>
> Patch attached.
your are right, the override is clearly miss spelled. I applied your
On Sat, Jul 23, 2016 at 6:09 AM Jon Boden wrote:
> This patch fixes SIGPWR warning on kfreebsd (and avoids hardcoding 29 for
> a signal we don't have ;-))
>
Hi Jon,
I've applied that patch to the Debian git. I'll also put this into
upstream. I wonder how many times you saw
Hi David,
On 08/21/16 16:30, David Härdeman wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I can confirm that the UI is broken and that the patch which Michael
> Terry submitted fixes the issue (tested a self-built version of the
> package with the patch).
>
> Maintainer, could you please consider releasing a new version
Package: src:linux
Version: 3.16.7-ckt25-2
Severity: important
Tags: upstream
Hi,
This machine has two ethernet cards.
$ lspci -nn | grep Ether
02:00.0 Ethernet controller [0200]: Qualcomm Atheros AR8161 Gigabit Ethernet
[1969:1091] (rev 10)
03:05.0 Ethernet controller [0200]: Realtek
On Sat, 27 Aug 2016, Muammar El Khatib wrote:
>
> I have now updated README.Debian.
I see you added this:
Depends: ..., pavucontrol, pulseaudio-utils, pulseaudio
but pulseaudio-utils isn't needed, as it is on the pulseaudio
dependency list.
In README.md, it might be a good idea to
Le 27/08/2016 à 16:39, James Clarke a écrit :
> Source: llvm-toolchain-3.8
> Version: 1:3.8.1-9
> Severity: important
> Tags: patch
> Control: clone -1 -2
> Control: reassign -2 llvm-toolchain-3.9 1:3.9~+rc3-1~exp1
> I have attached an updated version of use-deb-json.diff which uses the
> system
Hi Dmitry!
Dmitry Smirnov wrote:
> I tried the patch: bmon compiled so I was able to install it however it did
> not show any network interfaces on kFreeBSD...
With the patch applied to latest upstream Git, It shows network
interfaces for me on kfreebsd-amd64 10.1 and 10.3...
What kernel did
Hello intrigeri!
Read your bug report (#835533) and spent a few seconds looking at
the gcc6 ftbfs (#811640). The current ftbfs looks trivial to resolve
bit apparently noone cares enough about the package.
> DasherAppSettings.cpp:398:14: error: cannot convert 'bool' to 'const gchar*
> {aka const
On Sun, Aug 28, 2016 at 11:30:04AM +0200, Cristian Ionescu-Idbohrn wrote:
> On Sat, 27 Aug 2016, Muammar El Khatib wrote:
> >
> > I have now updated README.Debian.
>
> I see you added this:
>
> Depends: ..., pavucontrol, pulseaudio-utils, pulseaudio
>
> but pulseaudio-utils isn't needed, as
Control: fixed -1 pdal/1.3.0~rc1-1~exp1
Control: tags -1 pending
On 08/28/16 10:56, Santiago Vila wrote:
In file included from
/<>/plugins/icebridge/io/IcebridgeReader.hpp:55:0,
from
/<>/plugins/icebridge/io/IcebridgeReader.cpp:35:
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "node-inline-source-map"
* Package name: node-inline-source-map
Version : 0.6.1-1
Upstream Author : Thorsten Lorenz (http://thlorenz.com)
* URL
In https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=679482:
> Try strongswan, it works on Debian kfreebsd and ordinary wheezyy.
> racoon is long in the tooth, and because of the sort of bitrot and
> security issues it has (runs as root) I think it might be better if this
> part of ipsec-tools
Package: xfce4-power-manager
Version: 1.4.4-4
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
I am using xfce4-power-manager in conjunction with xmonad, and therefore
have not installed xfce4-session.
That results in xfce4-power-manager offering the option to lock the
screen on various events, but without
Source: dacs
Version: 1.4.28b-3
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: timestamps
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi,
Whilst working on the Reproducible Builds effort [0], I noticed
that dacs could not be built
Source: macs
Version: 2.1.1.20160309-1
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20160828 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> x86
Source: seahorse-nautilus
Version: 3.11.92-1
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20160828 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: plasma-discover
Version: 5.7.3-1
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20160828 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> m
Source: ismrmrd
Version: 1.3.2-3
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20160828 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> /usr/bin
Source: yosys
Version: 0.6-6
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20160828 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[2]: Enter
Source: kde-baseapps
Version: 4:16.04.3-1
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20160828 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> m
Source: syncthing
Version: 0.14.4+dfsg1-1
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20160828 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> m
Source: mathgl
Version: 2.3.4-1
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20160828 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> cd /<
Source: python-socketpool
Version: 0.5.3-2
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20160828 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: remctl
Version: 3.12-1
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20160828 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Source: ros-image-common
Version: 1.11.10-5
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20160828 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: python-axolotl
Version: 0.1.7-1
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20160828 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: docker.io
Version: 1.11.2~ds1-6
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20160828 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Source: python-riemann-client
Version: 6.3.0-1
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20160828 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: golint
Version: 0.0+git20150623.7b7f436-1
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20160828 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: python-protobuf.socketrpc
Version: 1.3.2-3
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20160828 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: plasma-sdk
Version: 5.7.0-1
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20160828 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Source: d-shlibs
Version: 0.75
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20160828 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Source: yowsup
Version: 2.4.103-3
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20160828 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> deb
Source: android-platform-development
Version: 6.0.1+r16-1
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20160828 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part
Source: ros-actionlib
Version: 1.11.6-2
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20160828 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Source: tcpwatch-httpproxy
Version: 1.3.1-1
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20160828 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: python-oauth2client
Version: 3.0.0-1
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20160828 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: seahorse-nautilus
Version: 3.11.92-1
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build from source
User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Dear Maintainer,
seahorse-nautilus fails to build from source in
Source: ruby-oauth2
Version: 1.2.0-1
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20160828 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: libnb-platform18-java
Version: 8.1+dfsg1-3
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20160828 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: gcc-5-cross-ports
Version: 10
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20160828 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> deb
Source: netcdf
Version: 1:4.4.1-1
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20160828 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> cd /<
Source: llvm-toolchain-3.7
Version: 1:3.7.1-2
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20160828 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: evolution-data-server
Version: 3.20.5-1
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20160828 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: libconfig-identity-perl
Version: 0.0018-2
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20160828 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: nut
Version: 2.7.4-3
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20160828 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[3]: Enter
Source: umbrello
Version: 4:16.04.2-1
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20160828 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Source: plplot
Version: 5.10.0+dfsg2-0.3
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20160828 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> x
Source: node-ast-util
Version: 0.6.0-1
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20160828 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Source: fail2ban
Version: 0.9.5-1
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20160828 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: torus-trooper
Version: 0.22.dfsg1-10
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20160828 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: pdal
Version: 1.2.0-4
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20160828 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> cd /<
Source: mapnik-vector-tile
Version: 1.1.2+dfsg-1
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20160828 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: golang-github-spf13-pflag
Version: 0.0~git20160427.0.cb88ea7-1
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20160828 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64
Source: golang-github-docker-go
Version: 0.0~git20160303.0.d30aec9-1
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20160828 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64
Source: python-pgmagick
Version: 0.6.2-1
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20160828 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: monkeysphere
Version: 0.38-1
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20160828 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Source: kate
Version: 4:16.04.2-1
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20160828 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Source: python-netlib
Version: 0.15.1-2
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20160828 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: salmon
Version: 0.4.2+ds1-3
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20160828 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: sosi2osm
Version: 1.0.0-2
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20160828 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> g++ -g
Source: inkscape
Version: 0.91-9
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20160828 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: gcc-6-cross-ports
Version: 9
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20160828 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Source: ggcov
Version: 0.9-11
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20160828 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> ERROR: (test
Source: libdbix-class-perl
Version: 0.082840-1
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20160828 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: ii-esu
Version: 1.0a.dfsg1-7
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20160828 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> c
Source: mercurial
Version: 3.9-1
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20160828 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> Skipped t
Source: golang-google-cloud
Version: 0.0~git20160413-1
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20160828 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part
Source: ros-bond-core
Version: 1.7.17-2
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20160828 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: kdepim
Version: 4:16.04.3-1
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20160828 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Source: gcr
Version: 3.20.0-2
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20160828 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> # Gcr-DE
Source: libvirt-php
Version: 0.5.2~30-g64dca6f-1
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20160828 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: containerd
Version: 0.2.1~ds1-2
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20160828 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
1 - 100 of 413 matches
Mail list logo