I think the PPD files in the latest version of foomatic-filters-ppds
are compatible with hpijs 2.x (at least for the printers where it
makes a difference), so it looks like we should actually make it
depend on the new hpijs rather than the old one.
Chris
--
Christopher N. Lawrence, Ph.D.
Visitin
On Wed, 19 Jan 2005 09:44:07 -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 18 Jan 2005, Chris Lawrence wrote:
> > I think the PPD files in the latest version of foomatic-filters-ppds
> > are compatible with hpijs 2.x (at least for the printers
es with the
same hardware. I'll investigate whether it's back in today's bundle.
Chris
--
Chris Lawrence - http://blog.lordsutch.com/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: wishlist
In sarge, cupsomatic-ppd is a transition package only, and should be
downgraded to "extra" priority. This also solves a priority imbalance
problem, as the package it depends on is of "extra" priority.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT pre
On Sat, 22 Jan 2005 08:04:25 +0100, Erwan David <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Le Fri 21/01/2005, Chris Lawrence disait
> > On Fri, 21 Jan 2005 23:36:49 +0100, Erwan David <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Package: foomatic-filters-ppds
> > > Versio
instead of function names).
Sounds like you hit a readline bug; reportbug is written in an
interpreted language, so it can't segfault on its own.
Chris
--
Chris Lawrence - http://blog.lordsutch.com/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
eportbug_3.2.tar.gz
> -rw-rw-r--1 1176 1176 107958 Nov 09 01:47 reportbug_3.2_all.deb
> -rw-rw-r--1 1176 1176 520 Jan 20 05:18 reportbug_3.6.dsc
> -rw-rw-r--1 1176 1176 128723 Jan 20 05:18 reportbug_3.6.tar.gz
> -rw-rw-r--1 1176 11
Package: python2.3
Version: 2.3.4-19
Followup-For: Bug #233305
Attached is a new version of this patch that should be more robust.
This is a often-reported issue against reportbug, so it should be
fixed. (See #234558 and the other bugs merged with it.)
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
I am confused as to why you have rated this bug as "important." As
you point out, there is no real way to make this determination in
software without breaking the automated sid->etch migration process;
the best that can be hoped for is an educated guess based on
apt-policy, but even that could be
ii psmisc 21.8-1 Utilities that use the proc
> filesy
> ii python 2.3.5-3 An interactive high-level
> object-o
> ii rsync2.6.6-1 fast remote file copy program
> (lik
> ii zlib1g [libz1] 1:1.2.3-8 compression library - runtime
>
> lsb-core recommends no packages.
>
> -- debconf information excluded
>
>
--
Chris Lawrence - http://blog.lordsutch.com/
Patches are, as always, welcome. But maintaining a separate etch
branch of the lsb package (or of base-files) is unrealistic, and
almost certainly would not be approved by the release managers.
More importantly, there is no real heuristic for figuring out whether
or not a system is "testing" or "
On 11/30/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You are right. Sorry for bothering you.
>
> Too bad the cheap (388k) and priority:standard package lpr must give
> way to the expensive (4156k) and priority:extra package lprng, or worse.
I suspect that it would be fairly easy to code a
ython2.3 2.3.5-9An interactive high-level
> object-o
>
> Versions of packages reportbug recommends:
> pn python2.3-cjkcodecs | python2 (no description available)
>
> -- no debconf information
>
> --
> see shy jo
>
>
> -
2.3.5-8An interactive high-level
> object-o
>
> Versions of packages reportbug recommends:
> pn python2.3-cjkcodecs | python2 (no description available)
>
> -- no debconf information
>
>
--
Chris Lawrence - http://blog.lordsutch.com/
>
> Here's more info
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> /home/linas %dpkg -s reportbug
> Package: reportbug
> Status: install ok installed
> Priority: standard
> Section: utils
> Installed-Size: 372
> Maintainer: Chris Lawrence <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
Ian - It appears that the individual packages that are generating
these messages are misusing the functions in /lib/lsb/init-functions;
the newlines are being produced by those scripts, not by the functions
themselves (which, if used properly, will give output
indistinguishable from the "old" loggi
t; [ "$VERBOSE" != no ] && log_end_msg $?
> fi
>
> Am I right that log_success_msg is the LSB function, which, according to
> you above, should _not_ be used?
Right, ideally the functions log_action_begin_msg and
log_action_end_msg should be used instead.
Chris
--
Chris Lawrence - http://blog.lordsutch.com/
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Chris Lawrence <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: r-cran-eco
Version : 2.2-1
Upstream Author : Kosuke Imai and Ying Lu
* URL : http://imai.princeton.edu/research/eco.html
* License : GPL
Description :
Pascal - Here are my proposed solutions, in no particular order:
- All of the hpijs PPDs are now removed from the binary package of
foomatic-filters-ppds.
This package now depends on hplip-ppds to ease the transition.
- All of the PPDs are now in /usr/share/ppd/foomatic-rip, which is
probably th
The logical resolution to this bug (Debian #335216,
/lib/lsb/init-functions uses getopt to parse arguments, requiring /usr
to be mounted) seems to be to move getopt into /bin.
Chris
--
Chris Lawrence <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - http://blog.lordsutch.com/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
5 modules for
> > MIME-compliant m
> > ii liburi-perl 1.35-1 Manipulates and accesses URI
> > strin
> > ii libwww-perl 5.803-4WWW client/server library for
> > Perl
> > ii perl 5.8.4-8Larry Wall's Practical
> > Extraction
> >
> > Versions of packages fetchyahoo recommends:
> > ii libterm-readkey-perl 2.21-1.3 A perl module for simple
> > terminal
> > ii procmail 3.22-11Versatile e-mail processor
> >
> > -- no debconf information
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
>
--
Chris Lawrence - http://blog.lordsutch.com/
> discarded.
>
> User configuration:
> editor: joe
> MTA: exim4 via smarthost
>
> sending mail via 'mail' works; smarthost is available.
>
>
--
Chris Lawrence - http://blog.lordsutch.com/
rinting.org printer support
>
> Versions of packages foomatic-filters-ppds recommends:
> ii cupsys 1.1.99.b1.r4841-1 Common UNIX Printing System(tm) -
> ii cupsys-drive 4.3.99+cvs20051122.dfsg.1-1 printer drivers for CUPS
> ii foo2zjs 20051113-1 Support for printing to
> ZjStream-b
> pn ppm2ppa(no description available)
>
> -- no debconf information
>
>
--
Chris Lawrence - http://blog.lordsutch.com/
e use of symlinks.
What happens if you call /usr/bin/editor directly from the command
line? I suspect you would get the same result, since argv[0] would be
"editor" - not "jmacs".
Chris
--
Chris Lawrence - http://blog.lordsutch.com/
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Chris Lawrence <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: r-cran-pscl
Version : 0.5
Upstream Author : Simon Jackman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://pscl.stanford.edu/
* License : GPL
Description : GNU R
out, this package should be removed. If you agree, please reassign
> this bug to ftp.debian.org.
>
> --
> Martin Michlmayr
> http://www.cyrius.com/
>
>
>
--
Chris Lawrence - http://blog.lordsutch.com/
You can already add X-Debbugs-CC or CC to the email in the editor; the
exact behavior you ask for isn't implemented (CC is not transformed to
X-Debbugs-CC), but I'm not sure that's desirable anyway.
Chris
--
Chris Lawrence - http://blog.lordsutch.com/
n we
can get on with our lives.
Chris
--
Chris Lawrence - http://blog.lordsutch.com/
ends is necessary, since base-files is
Essential and depends on awk. (Why lintian doesn't catch that too is
beyond me.) As long as AWK=/usr/bin/awk according to R, we're good to
go.
Chris
--
Chris Lawrence - http://blog.lordsutch.com/
Can you remove line 1326 of /usr/bin/reportbug and try again? I
accidentally left in some debugging code. I believe this will fix the
problem.
Chris
--
Chris Lawrence - http://blog.lordsutch.com/
I'm still not convinced this is really RC, by the way... any
non-seriously-broken system should have mawk installed.
Chris
--
Chris Lawrence - http://blog.lordsutch.com/
se for this issue (which affects exactly zero people) is rich.
Dirk: attached is a 3-line patch to r-base that should fix the issue globally.
Chris
--
Chris Lawrence - http://blog.lordsutch.com/
diff
Description: Binary data
unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
> Architecture: i386 (i686)
> Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
> Kernel: Linux 2.6.11-1-686
> Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ISO-8859-1) (ignored: LC_ALL set to en_US)
>
> Versions of packages reportbug depends on:
> ii python2.3 2.3.5-3An interactive high-level
> object-o
>
> -- no debconf information
>
>
>
--
Chris Lawrence - http://blog.lordsutch.com/
and encoding in the
> documentation and/or default /etc/reportbug.conf file.
If there are no 8-bit characters in the message, it will be sent with
a us-ascii body; this is not a bug (in fact, you would find that mutt
has the same behavior).
Chris
--
Chris Lawrence - http://blog.lordsutch.com/
useful so please
> request any info you would need.
This is rather mysterious... what does "python -c 'import foomatic'" say?
Chris
--
Chris Lawrence - http://blog.lordsutch.com/
On 4/26/05, Alfie Costa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ...but I don't understand what "Normal bugs - outstanding: 5 remain" means.
> There's more than 5 bugs remaining. So it's 5 of what?
5 appear on the next screenful.
Chris
--
Chris Lawrence - http://blog.lordsutch.com/
produce it here).
> That kind of bugs is what drives people to use Windows.
Thanks for the constructive comments; we really appreciate them.
Chris
--
Chris Lawrence - http://blog.lordsutch.com/
tags 305520 -unreproducible
severity 305520 critical
thanks
On 5/12/05, Lars Wirzenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> to, 2005-05-12 kello 13:26 -0500, Chris Lawrence kirjoitti:
> > tags 305520 +unreproducible sarge moreinfo
> > thanks
> >
> > Did you try the worka
D]"
> DEBFULLNAME="Peter S Galbraith"
>
> -- System Information:
> Debian Release: 3.1
> APT prefers unstable
> APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
> Architecture: i386 (i686)
> Kernel: Linux 2.4.27-1-k7
> Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=en_US.ISO-8859-1 (c
Package: tasksel
Version: 2.22
Severity: wishlist
Subject says it all, really. On the other hand, maybe printconf and
friends should be in a more desktop-oriented task. Regardless,
printing is something that probably needs to be taken care of in a
"batteries included" sense.
-- System Informati
SER?} \
> -s "iamerican: ${*?}" [EMAIL PROTECTED] < Package: iamerican
> Severity: wishlist
> These might be missing from ispell(1) and/or look(1):
>
> `echo $@|xargs -n 1`
> EOF
>
>
--
Chris Lawrence - http://blog.lordsutch.com/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
2.6.1-1Python bindings for the GNOME
> desk
> ii smbclient 3.0.10-1 a LanManager-like simple client
> fo
>
> -- no debconf information
>
>
--
Chris Lawrence - http://blog.lordsutch.com/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
e to the Foomatic
> p
> ii python-glade2 2.6.1-2GTK+ bindings: Glade support
> ii python-gnome2 2.6.1-1Python bindings for the GNOME
> desk
> ii python-gtk2 2.6.1-2Python bindings for the GTK+
> widge
> ii python2.3-gnome2 2.6.1-1Python bindings for the GNOME
> desk
>
> -- no debconf information
>
>
--
Chris Lawrence - http://blog.lordsutch.com/
What does /etc/foomatic/defaultspooler say?
Chris
--
Chris Lawrence - http://blog.lordsutch.com/
I think I've figured out the problem... foomatic-configure doesn't
figure out what spooler is being used if you don't have any printer
queues yet. I'll have a fix shortly.
Chris
--
Chris Lawrence - http://blog.lordsutch.com/
d not found
> make[1]: *** [world2.line] Error 127
>
> You should add a build dependency on gawk.
Chris
--
Chris Lawrence - http://blog.lordsutch.com/
se feel free to lower the severity of this bug.
I'd rather see it fixed for sarge ;-)
Chris
--
Chris Lawrence - http://blog.lordsutch.com/
On 5/5/05, Dirk Eddelbuettel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 5 May 2005 at 22:46, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> | On Thu, May 05, 2005 at 03:25:42PM -0500, Chris Lawrence wrote:
> | > Could be something in how r-base is built on amd64... Dirk, any ideas?
> | > I think it ha
nfigure, but that should
> amount to the same as calling for it in the Build-Depends.
No, because 'Build-Depends: mawk' would still make it possible for
gawk to be installed and found by configure (instead of mawk, which is
always installed on a Debian system).
Chris
--
Chris Lawrence - http://blog.lordsutch.com/
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Chris Lawrence <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: r-cran-bayesm
Version : 0.0-2
Upstream Authors: Peter Rossi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Rob McCulloch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
* URL: http://gsbwww.uchicago.e
ariety of other issues.
Chris
--
Chris Lawrence - http://blog.lordsutch.com/
t have had a billion other things to do).
No clue if it will make it into sarge.
CNL
--
Chris Lawrence - http://blog.lordsutch.com/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
sum, debsums
> exits with failure :(
>
> Please reassign this bug to debsums if that is a better choice.
Will do.
Chris
--
Chris Lawrence - http://blog.lordsutch.com/
not a
> foomatic guru.
>
> Chris, have you had any problems with the new gutenprint foomatic
> data, or with the gui?
I haven't tested it yet, but I'll take a look. It's possible the
gutenprint XML files are slightly different in a way that confuses the
XML parser in foomatic-gui/printconf.
Chris
--
Chris Lawrence - http://blog.lordsutch.com/
On 7/20/05, Chris Lawrence <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 7/20/05, Roger Leigh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Christoph Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > > Package: foomatic-db-gutenprint
> >
> > > after installing foomatic-db-gute
Package: mozilla-firefox
Version: 1.0.6-1
Followup-For: Bug #319364
This problem appears to affect pages that are stored in the cache, as
well as using refresh. Downgrading back to 1.0.5-1 seems to have
fixed the problem.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unst
d0 ***
So, it looks like a bug in foomatic-configure (part of
foomatic-db-engine), probably the C-based XML parsing code it uses.
Chris
--
Chris Lawrence - http://blog.lordsutch.com/
blem for GNOME reports, why not produce a
custom bugscript to do it? Especially considering reportbug is
feature-frozen for sarge...
Chris
--
Chris Lawrence - http://blog.lordsutch.com/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, 30 Mar 2005 22:36:44 +0200, Josselin Mouette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Le mercredi 30 mars 2005 à 14:17 -0600, Chris Lawrence a écrit :
> > > In the GNOME team, we are repeatedly receiving bugs from people who have
> > > locally installed versions of some lib
es reportbug depends on:
> ii python2.3 2.3.5-3An interactive high-level
> object-o
>
> -- no debconf information
--
Chris Lawrence - http://blog.lordsutch.com/
2.6.1-1Python bindings for the GNOME
> desk
>
> Versions of packages foomatic-gui recommends:
> pn netcat (no description available)
> pn nmap (no description available)
> pn pconf-detect (no description available)
> pn smbclient (no description available)
>
> -- no debconf information
>
>
>
--
Chris Lawrence - http://blog.lordsutch.com/
Package: r-cran-rgl
Version: 0.64.13-3
Severity: serious
Subject says it all, really... the upload of X.org to sid makes this
package not installable with the upgraded xutils and x-window-system-core.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (50
On 7/13/05, Dirk Eddelbuettel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 13, 2005 at 01:47:43PM -0500, Chris Lawrence wrote:
> > Package: r-cran-rgl
> > Version: 0.64.13-3
> > Severity: serious
> >
> > Subject says it all, really... the upload of X.org to sid
box in my office tomorrow (which I can't ssh to from
home).
Chris
--
Chris Lawrence - http://blog.lordsutch.com/
grity...
> There may be a problem with your installation of elinks;
> the following files appear to be missing or changed:
>
> Do you still want to file a report [y|N|q|?]?
>
>
> The list of "missing or changed" file is missing.
What does 'debsums elinks' say?
Chris
--
Chris Lawrence - http://blog.lordsutch.com/
On 10/21/05, s. keeling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Package: foomatic-db-engine
> Version: 3.0.2-20050720-1
> Followup-For: Bug #261662
>
> I did a dist-upgrade the other day and ever since printing has been
> broken. Running foomatic-configure to recover, I see:
>
> foomatic-configure -n lp -N
i libterm-readkey-perl 2.21-1.3 A perl module for simple terminal
> ii procmail 3.22-11Versatile e-mail processor
>
> -- no debconf information
>
>
>
--
Chris Lawrence - http://blog.lordsutch.com/
sification; it's just two different views of the BTS.
For example, if you report a bug on "lsb-base," it will appear under
the "lsb-base" binary package and the "lsb" source package... because
the lsb-base binary is built from the lsb source package.
Hope this helps!
Chris
--
Chris Lawrence - http://blog.lordsutch.com/
t's still open in the BTS
or not.
My recommended solution for now is to disable querying with
--no-query-bts (or no-query-bts in your .reportbugrc).
Chris
--
Chris Lawrence - http://blog.lordsutch.com/
; response time is so slow that it is unusable, and, in fact, the
> characters come out in reverse order (if I type sufficiently fast).
Strange... I'll have to look into this one.
Chris
--
Chris Lawrence - http://blog.lordsutch.com/
is one is either for bugs.debian.org or debbugs (not
reportbug), but I can never remember which one you're supposed to
assign stuff like this to...
Chris
--
Chris Lawrence - http://blog.lordsutch.com/
esting direct action
> from other developers.
The --gpg option doesn't work for you?
Chris
--
Chris Lawrence - http://blog.lordsutch.com/
eful on the m68k architecture (equivalent to lspci, etc.). If
someone wants to adopt it from me (I don't have an m68k box any more),
that's fine, but I don't think it should be removed.
Chris
--
Chris Lawrence - http://blog.lordsutch.com/
ted; they are probably bugs (i.e. I forgot to supply the
user-agent properly somewhere).
Chris
--
Chris Lawrence - http://blog.lordsutch.com/
On 8/19/05, Don Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 19 Aug 2005, Chris Lawrence wrote:
> > As indicated, the user-agent should be "reportbug/([0-9.]+)
> > (Debian)". I'm not sure where the python-urllib requests are coming
> > from that someon
d '
'when sending bug reports? [%s]' %
(options.email or def_email),options=[def_email],
force_prompt=True)
So, I'm not entirely sure what you're complaining about here... this
satisfies #2 amply.
Chris
--
Chris Lawrence - http://blog.lordsutch.com/
This report appears to be a dupe of 316608 (fixed in sid) anyway...
Chris
On 8/24/05, Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > "Debian" == Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Debian> Thank you for the additional information you have supplied
> Debian> regardin
(continuation) (completion)
I guess we also need log_set_parameter() -- two paragraphs up in
Policy 9.4.
Look for it all in the next release.
Chris
--
Chris Lawrence <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - http://blog.lordsutch.com/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsu
gt;
> -- no debconf information
>
> --
> Il messaggio e' stato analizzato alla ricerca di virus o
> contenuti pericolosi da MailScanner, ed e'
> risultato non infetto.
>
>
>
--
Chris Lawrence - http://blog.lordsutch.com/
map=ANSI_X3.4-1968) (ignored: LC_ALL set to C)
>
> Versions of packages reportbug depends on:
> ii python2.3 2.3.5-8An interactive high-level
> object-o
>
> Versions of packages reportbug recommends:
> ii python2.3-iconvcodec 1.1.2-1Python universal Unicode codec,
> us
>
> -- no debconf information
>
>
--
Chris Lawrence - http://blog.lordsutch.com/
In xpdf's case... the end user may not be sure if it's a bug in
xpdf-reader, xpdf-utils, etc.
querybts's default behavior is to query binary bugs because (a) that
was the original behavior of both and (b) querybts is generally headed
the way of the dodo, in favor of reportbug --query
>> P.S., do give examples of MAILREADER, sendmail? exim? mutt? emacs?
>
>
--
Chris Lawrence - http://blog.lordsutch.com/
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: minor
The lsb-release binary package (and lsb_release command) are now
built from the lsb source package; the lsb-release source package is
thus obsolete and can be removed immediately from unstable.
(NB - I adopted lsb-release from Joerg Jaspert a few weeks ago,
On 9/24/05, Marco d'Itri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Package: lsb-base
> Version: 3.0-8
> Severity: important
> Tags: patch
>
> In log_action_end_msg():
>
> - else:
> + else
Oops, too much Python coding! Will fix...
Chris
--
Chris Lawrence - http://blog.lordsutch.com/
ndmail option to reportbug.conf ?
> 139) #323374: reportbug: Automatically add security tag
> (124-139/163) Is the bug you found listed above [y|N|m|r|q|s|f|?]?
> Looking up dependencies of reportbug...
> Maintainer for reportbug is 'Chris Lawrence <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>'.
h that somehow unless we want yet more gratuitous Ubuntu patching).
Chris
--
Chris Lawrence - http://blog.lordsutch.com/
This looks like a bug in gcj on SPARC. None of the other buildds seem
to have tripped this problem; it may relate to the version drift in
libgcj6-dev on SPARC.
Chris
--
Chris Lawrence - http://blog.lordsutch.com/
o derived distros). My suggestion is to update
pcmcia-cs and other affected packages to use the new facility.
Chris
--
Chris Lawrence - http://blog.lordsutch.com/
ould be nice to have.
Chris
--
Chris Lawrence <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - http://blog.lordsutch.com/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
have a bug in an embedded system chances are
you're the sort of user who can fire up mailx and format the report
manually... it isn't that hard)
Chris
--
Chris Lawrence - http://blog.lordsutch.com/
merge 315139 322852
thanks
The reason for this message is that for some idiotic reason, vim gets
installed at a ridiculously high priority for the editor alternative,
and it seems to get pulled in by a fairly common task. Hence, lots of
newbies make (or made, before the vi nag) reports that they
Package: python2.3-ipy
Severity: important
This package is built as an architecture "any" package, but there is
no reason for it to be built that way: the only code is in Python,
which doesn't need to be recompiled for other architectures. So, this
package (and python2.4-ipy) should be Architectu
t;
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
>
> iD8DBQFC8NFoDecnbV4Fd/IRAv84AKDUm+65TNT9e2E/fyn5S08E4n98QgCg02vj
> EaqQAHobAjfWHogEy9CWvgM=
> =mgxe
> -END PGP SIGNATURE-
>
>
>
--
Chris Lawrence - http://blog.lordsutch.com/
gt; CUPS is not beeing installed.
Actually, no it doesn't.
> Please read the DIN EN ISO 9241 part 9 and following to learn the basic
> rules for human interace design. And maybe VDI 3850 if you can get that.
Go read them yourself. And before ranting again check to make sure
you're ranting about the right package (see ipp question above).
Chris
--
Chris Lawrence - http://blog.lordsutch.com/
.5.12 register and build utility for Pyt
Versions of packages reportbug recommends:
pn python-cjkcodecs | python-ico (no description available)
-- no debconf information
--
Chris Lawrence - http://blog.lordsutch.com/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 12/23/06, Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Something is very screwy about this report. In any event, reportbug
> only recommends iconvcodec... and there's a report on that (401870)
> already.
I think that the screwy thing is that you cloned a bug filed against
python-feedparser to repo
Package: texlive-pdfetex
Version: 2005.dfsg.2-2
Severity: wishlist
I'm still not sure I did this right to make everything within TeXLive
happy... I copied pdftexconfig.tex into /etc/texmf/tex/generic/config
then hacked it as follows, since none of the obvious approaches
(running texconfig in vario
On 11/10/06, Andre Wendt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Package: reportbug
Version: 3.30
Severity: normal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
whenever I try to send a signed bug report, after saying "You need a
passphrase ..." and selecting the key, I get a message saying
can't conn
On 12/8/06, Gary Koskenmaki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Package: reportbug
Version: 3.31
Severity: normal
Reportbug does not recognize Iceweasel as a valid package name
Works for me. Is your package list up to date?
Chris
--
Chris Lawrence - http://blog.lordsutch.com/
--
To UNSUB
On 11/3/06, Thomas Deutsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Package: lsb-release
Version: 3.1-15
The packege lsb-release of Etch has /etc/lsb-release included, but it
should.
Actually, the file is completely unnecessary; our lsb_release command
works fine without it.
Chris
--
Chris La
1 - 100 of 300 matches
Mail list logo
