Bug#340173: bugs.debian.org: re bug#340713: another one found with #340381

2006-02-06 Thread Al Stone 
On Sun, 2006-02-05 at 10:51 +0100, Loïc Minier wrote:
 On Sat, Feb 04, 2006, Al Stone wrote:
  This same problem occurs with #340381 where the bug was fixed
  two uploads ago but is still being reported as outstanding.
 
  #340381 doesn't appear as outstanding right now, so I believe this was
  fixed yesterday when people addressed the space problem on spohr.

This does seem to have fixed it.  Thanks.

-- 
Ciao,
al
--
Al Stone  Alter Ego:
Open Source and Linux RD Debian Developer
Hewlett-Packard Company   http://www.debian.org
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED]
--

Bug#340173: bugs.debian.org: re bug#340713: another one found with #340381

2006-02-05 Thread Loïc Minier 
On Sat, Feb 04, 2006, Al Stone wrote:
 This same problem occurs with #340381 where the bug was fixed
 two uploads ago but is still being reported as outstanding.

 #340381 doesn't appear as outstanding right now, so I believe this was
 fixed yesterday when people addressed the space problem on spohr.

-- 
Loïc Minier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Current Earth status:   NOT DESTROYED

Bug#340173: bugs.debian.org: re bug#340713: another one found with #340381

2006-02-04 Thread Al Stone 
Package: bugs.debian.org
Followup-For: Bug #340173

This same problem occurs with #340381 where the bug was fixed
two uploads ago but is still being reported as outstanding.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.15-1-686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#340713: another one

2006-01-04 Thread Sam Clegg 
I also have a bug showing as outstanding that isn't: #338355
-- 
sam clegg
:: [EMAIL PROTECTED] :: http://superduper.net/ :: PGP : D91EE369
$superduper: .signature,v 1.14 2005/01/19 13:21:14 sam Exp $


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#340713: another one

2006-01-04 Thread Colin Watson 
On Wed, Jan 04, 2006 at 05:41:38PM +, Sam Clegg wrote:
 I also have a bug showing as outstanding that isn't: #338355

This is because 3.4-1 hasn't been built for all architectures yet; if
you look at the top of the page you'll find a clue to this:

  Debian Bug report logs: package proguard in unstable (versions 3.3.2-1, 3.4-1)

... and
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?pkg=proguarddist=unstablearch=i386
shows it in the right section.

Admittedly, it's only hurd-i386 that hasn't built it yet. Maybe we
should restrict the default architectures to all release architectures
or something, rather than all archive architectures.

Cheers,

-- 
Colin Watson   [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#340713: Another one: bug #314923

2005-12-13 Thread Manolo Díaz 
Hi,

The bug #314923 (merged with #334019) is taged fixed and archived but
still remains as outstanding at
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?pkg=grace6;dist=unstable


Regards,
Manolo Díaz