On 24/12/09 at 19:56 -0500, Jeremy T. Bouse wrote:
Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
On 24/12/09 at 13:02 -0500, Jeremy T. Bouse wrote:
Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
On 24/12/09 at 12:04 -0500, Jeremy T. Bouse wrote:
I suggest there might be something wrong with the amd64 build box
you're using as the
Source: libgcgi
Version: 0.9.5.dfsg-5
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20091223 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
/usr/bin/fakeroot debian/rules clean
I suggest there might be something wrong with the amd64 build box
you're using as the buildd report [1] shows that 0.9.5.dfsg-5 was built
successfully Dec 12th. I've also re-downloaded the 0.9.5.dfsg-5 version
from the mirrors and rebuilt under a pbuilder chroot and it built
successfully
On 24/12/09 at 12:04 -0500, Jeremy T. Bouse wrote:
I suggest there might be something wrong with the amd64 build box
you're using as the buildd report [1] shows that 0.9.5.dfsg-5 was built
successfully Dec 12th. I've also re-downloaded the 0.9.5.dfsg-5 version
from the mirrors and
Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
On 24/12/09 at 12:04 -0500, Jeremy T. Bouse wrote:
I suggest there might be something wrong with the amd64 build box
you're using as the buildd report [1] shows that 0.9.5.dfsg-5 was built
successfully Dec 12th. I've also re-downloaded the 0.9.5.dfsg-5 version
from
On 24/12/09 at 13:02 -0500, Jeremy T. Bouse wrote:
Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
On 24/12/09 at 12:04 -0500, Jeremy T. Bouse wrote:
I suggest there might be something wrong with the amd64 build box
you're using as the buildd report [1] shows that 0.9.5.dfsg-5 was built
successfully Dec 12th.
Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
On 24/12/09 at 13:02 -0500, Jeremy T. Bouse wrote:
Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
On 24/12/09 at 12:04 -0500, Jeremy T. Bouse wrote:
I suggest there might be something wrong with the amd64 build box
you're using as the buildd report [1] shows that 0.9.5.dfsg-5 was built
7 matches
Mail list logo
