Bug#577853: usb-modeswitch-data: Unusual chars in filenames

2010-04-16 Thread Frank Lin PIAT
Hello Didier,

On Thu, 2010-04-15 at 10:24 +0200, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote:
 Le jeudi 15 avril 2010 09:47:22 Frank Lin PIAT, vous avez écrit :
  
  The package usb-modeswitch-data provide the file:
/etc/usb_modeswitch.d/16d8:6803:?
  
  The question-mark ? symbol is unusual on unix filesystem, and it is
  almost guaranteed that it is going to break various script (both
  provided by Debian and local admin ones).
  
  Also, I suggest to replace the column too.
 
 Although I recognise that : and ? symbols are somehow special on Unix 
 filesystems, I don't see this as a problem, because usb-modeswitch just 
 works 
 with those files. Thus downgrading severity to wishlist (I am of course open 
 to 
 discussion).

I was not concerned about usb-modeswitch not working, but I was worried
about third-party (bash) script, that may not be prepared to handle
unusual chars. I am especially thinking of script written by the local
system maintainer.
For instance, since the column is a standard delimiter for bash $PATH
variable, many script developer may assume that no single file contains
column.

 Furthermore, this is clearly an upstream issue which should be fixed there, 
 to 
 ensure cross-distribution compatibility, thus tagging as such. I will make 
 sure 
 upstream (CCed) is aware of the issue and eventually commenting on the 
 bugreport.
 
 Is such an action schedule (non-action schedule…) fine for you?

Fixing the bug upstream is probably the sensible thing to do.

Regards,

Franklin




--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#577853: usb-modeswitch-data: Unusual chars in filenames

2010-04-15 Thread Frank Lin PIAT
Package: usb-modeswitch-data
Version: 20100322-2
Severity: normal

Hello,

The package usb-modeswitch-data provide the file:
  /etc/usb_modeswitch.d/16d8:6803:?

The question-mark ? symbol is unusual on unix filesystem, and it is
almost guaranteed that it is going to break various script (both
provided by Debian and local admin ones).

Also, I suggest to replace the column too.

Thanks,

Franklin

-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing'), (101, 'unstable'), (10, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-4-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

Versions of packages usb-modeswitch-data depends on:
ii  udev  151-3  /dev/ and hotplug management daemo

Versions of packages usb-modeswitch-data recommends:
ii  usb-modeswitch1.1.1-1mode switching tool for controllin

usb-modeswitch-data suggests no packages.

-- no debconf information



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#577853: usb-modeswitch-data: Unusual chars in filenames

2010-04-15 Thread Didier 'OdyX' Raboud
package usb-modeswitch-data
tags 577853 +upstream
severity 577853 whishlist
thanks

Le jeudi 15 avril 2010 09:47:22 Frank Lin PIAT, vous avez écrit :
 Package: usb-modeswitch-data
 Version: 20100322-2
 Severity: normal
 
 Hello,
 
 The package usb-modeswitch-data provide the file:
   /etc/usb_modeswitch.d/16d8:6803:?
 
 The question-mark ? symbol is unusual on unix filesystem, and it is
 almost guaranteed that it is going to break various script (both
 provided by Debian and local admin ones).
 
 Also, I suggest to replace the column too.
 
 Thanks,
 
 Franklin

Hi Franklin, and thanks for your bugreport,

Although I recognise that : and ? symbols are somehow special on Unix 
filesystems, I don't see this as a problem, because usb-modeswitch just works 
with those files. Thus downgrading severity to wishlist (I am of course open to 
discussion).

Furthermore, this is clearly an upstream issue which should be fixed there, to 
ensure cross-distribution compatibility, thus tagging as such. I will make sure 
upstream (CCed) is aware of the issue and eventually commenting on the 
bugreport.

Is such an action schedule (non-action schedule…) fine for you?

Cheers, 

OdyX

-- 
Didier Raboud, proud Debian Maintainer (DM).
CH-1020 Renens
did...@raboud.com


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.