Hi Sandro,
On 26.11.15 00:12, Sandro Tosi wrote:
>> Once I've cleaned things up, I'll gladly come back to you for help and
>> review! This is a big change, and I'd feel much more comfortable with
>> more eyes looking into this.
>
> absolutely, anytime! thanks!
It's been a while (even by Debian s
> Once I've cleaned things up, I'll gladly come back to you for help and
> review! This is a big change, and I'd feel much more comfortable with
> more eyes looking into this.
absolutely, anytime! thanks!
--
Sandro Tosi (aka morph, morpheus, matrixhasu)
My website: http://matrixhasu.altervista.o
On 2015-11-25 22:01, Sandro Tosi wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 8:20 PM, Christian Kastner wrote:
>>> I'm wondering if you plan on switching to '3.0 (quilt)' anytime soon,
>>> eventually
>>> resurrecting the work done for 79fc563.
>>
>> I started the conversion years ago (see the sf3 branch), b
On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 8:20 PM, Christian Kastner wrote:
> Hi Sandro,
>
> On 2015-11-25 16:04, Sandro Tosi wrote:
>> Hello,
>> I found myself in a situation where I need to patch cron, and it is a huge
>> pain
>> to handle that patch when the source package contains the debian changes
>> directl
Hi Sandro,
On 2015-11-25 16:04, Sandro Tosi wrote:
> Hello,
> I found myself in a situation where I need to patch cron, and it is a huge
> pain
> to handle that patch when the source package contains the debian changes
> directly applied to the upstream source code.
>
> Looking at the git repo h
Package: cron
Version: 3.0pl1-128
Severity: minor
Hello,
I found myself in a situation where I need to patch cron, and it is a huge pain
to handle that patch when the source package contains the debian changes
directly applied to the upstream source code.
Looking at the git repo history, it appea
6 matches
Mail list logo
