Bug#807428: [Debian-ha-maintainers] Bug#807428: Bug#807428: csync2: socket activation and running as system user

2016-10-16 Thread Christoph Berg 
Re: Valentin Vidic 2016-10-16 
<20161016081037.btwvht6ol4ro2...@gavran.carpriv.carnet.hr>
> On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 09:39:22AM +0200, Christoph Berg wrote:
> > Don't get me wrong, I would also like to see it handled via systemd,
> > but at the moment I think it would cause more trouble than it would
> > solve.
> 
> What if we move inetd to recommends and ship systemd service in disabled
> state?  It should not break the upgrade and still allow users to remove
> inetd if this is the only inet daemon they need to run.

That might work, I guess.

Christoph

Bug#807428: [Debian-ha-maintainers] Bug#807428: Bug#807428: csync2: socket activation and running as system user

2016-10-16 Thread Valentin Vidic 
On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 09:39:22AM +0200, Christoph Berg wrote:
> Don't get me wrong, I would also like to see it handled via systemd,
> but at the moment I think it would cause more trouble than it would
> solve.

What if we move inetd to recommends and ship systemd service in disabled
state?  It should not break the upgrade and still allow users to remove
inetd if this is the only inet daemon they need to run.

-- 
Valentin